Psychological Studies

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 19–24 | Cite as

A Glass Half Full Not Empty: Strength-Based Practice in Persons with Substance Use Disorders

Reflections
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

The strength-based practice highlights the inherent competencies, resources, and values of an individual. While acknowledging underlying problem behaviors, it moves toward identifying potential solutions and meanings an individual holds. It therefore presents an innovative method to working with clients with different mental health concerns, including substance use disorders (SUD) with a focus on building resources. Traditionally, psychosocial interventions in the field of SUD have focused on behavioral management, cognitive approaches and the 12-steps programs. Such approaches have a leaning toward the deficit model and identify underlying pathology seen in addiction. Moving toward a strengths perspective offers possibilities to view one’s self and others in a positive light. In the current report, we present an argument to incorporate strength-based practices such as Motivational Interviewing, Solution-focused family therapy, Family-Centered Practice, Community-Based Participatory Research interventions and Case Management in working with persons with SUD. Specifically, we recommend a therapeutic focus of individual, family and community interventions that intensify movement toward healing by examining variables that instill well-being, while destigmatizing addiction. Secondly, we look at relational research such as social support, social networks and family strengths. Finally, we review aspects of community support groups and access to help that are intertwined within a strengths model.

Keywords

Substance use disorders Strengths Motivational interviewing Family Community 

References

  1. Amrhein, P. C., Miller, W. R., Yahne, C. E., Palmer, M., & Fulcher, L. (2003). Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 862–878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anstiss, T. (2009). Motivational interviewing in primary care. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 16(1), 87–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baydala, L. T., Sewlal, B., Rasmussen, C., Alexis, K., Fletcher, F., Letendre, L., et al. (2009). A culturally adapted drug and alcohol abuse prevention program for Aboriginal children and youth. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 3(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, R. S., Daughtridge, R., & Sloane, P. D. (2002). Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 15(1), 25–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brody, G. H., Chen, Y. F., Kogan, S. M., Yu, T., Molgaard, V. K., DiClemente, R. J., et al. (2012). Family-centered program deters substance use, conduct problems, and depressive symptoms in black adolescents. Pediatrics, 129(1), 108–115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Chasteen, A. L., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2001). Implementation intentions and facilitation of prospective memory. Psychological Science, 12(6), 457–461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunst, C. J. (1997). Conceptual and empirical foundations of family-centered practice. In R. J. Illback, C. T. Cobb, & H. M. Joseph, Jr. (Eds.), Integrated services for children and families: Opportunities for psychological practice (pp. 75–91). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  8. Dunst, C. J. (2002). Family-centered practices: Birth through high school. The Journal of Special Education, 36(3), 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dupree, C. H., Magill, M., & Apodaca, T. R. (2015). The pros and cons of drinking: A qualitative analysis of young adult drinking discussions within motivational interviewing. Addiction Research & Theory24(1), 40–47.Google Scholar
  10. Epse-Sherwindt, M. A. R. I. L. Y. N. (2008). Family-centred practice: Collaboration, competency and evidence. Support for Learning, 23(3), 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ewing, S. W. F., Houck, J. M., Yezhuvath, U., Shokri-Kojori, E., Truitt, D., & Filbey, F. M. (2016). The impact of therapists’ words on the adolescent brain: In the context of addiction treatment. Behavioural Brain Research, 297, 359–369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.09.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanson, M., & Gutheil, I. A. (2004). Motivational strategies with alcohol-involved older adults: Implications for social work practice. Social Work, 49(3), 364–372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hawkins, J. D., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., & Abbott, R. D. (2008). Effects of social development intervention in childhood fifteen years later. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 162(12), 1133–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hecht, J., Borrelli, B., Breger, R. K., DeFrancesco, C., Ernst, D., & Resnicow, K. (2005). Motivational interviewing in community-based research: Experiences from the field. Annals of Behavioral Medicine29(2), 29–34.Google Scholar
  15. Heckman, C. J., Egleston, B. L., & Hofmann, M. T. (2010). Efficacy of motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tobacco Control, 19(5), 410–416.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Heyne, L. A., & Anderson, L. S. (2012). Theories that support strengths-based practice in therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 46(2), 106.Google Scholar
  17. Hiscock, H., Bayer, J. K., Price, A., Ukoumunne, O. C., Rogers, S., & Wake, M. (2008). Universal parenting programme to prevent early childhood behavioural problems. Cluster randomised trial. BMJ, 336(7639), 318–321.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Ialongo, N., Poduska, J., Werthamer, L., & Kellam, S. (2001). The distal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on conduct problems and disorder in early adolescence. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9(3), 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karen, S., & Ingersoll, C. C. (2002). Motivational groups for community substance abuse programs. Richmond, VA: Mid-Atlantic Addiction Technology.Google Scholar
  20. Lazarus, L., Shaw, A., LeBlanc, S., Martin, A., Marshall, Z., Weersink, K., et al. (2014). Establishing a community-based participatory research partnership among people who use drugs in Ottawa: The PROUD cohort study. Harm Reduction Journal, 11(26).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-11-26.
  21. Lowe, J., Liang, H., Riggs, C., Henson, J., & Elder, T. (2012). Community partnership to affect substance abuse among Native American adolescents. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 38(5), 450–455.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. McLellan, A. T., Hagan, T. A., Levine, M., Meyers, K., Gould, F., Bencivengo, M., et al. (1999). Does clinical case management improve outpatient addiction treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 55(1), 91–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller, W. R., Benefield, R. G., & Tonigan, J. S. (1993). Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: A controlled comparison of two therapist styles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 455–5461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). New York: The Gulliford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Miller-Heyl, J., MacPhee, D., & Fritz, J. J. (1998). Dare to be you: A family-support, early prevention program. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 18(3), 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (2006). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  27. Pantin, H., Schwartz, S. J., Sullivan, S., Coatsworth, J. D., & Szapocznik, J. (2003). Preventing substance abuse in Hispanic immigrant adolescents: An ecodevelopmental, parent-centered approach. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(4), 469–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pattoni, L (2012, May 1). Strengths-based approaches for working with individuals. Retrieved from https://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/insights/strengths-based-approaches-working-individuals.
  29. Radin, S. M., Kutz, S. H., La Marr, J., Vendiola, D., Vendiola, M., Wilbur, B., et al. (2015). Community perspectives on drug/alcohol use, concerns, needs, and resources in four Washington State Tribal communities. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 14(1), 29–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Rapp, R. C., Siegal, H. A., & Fisher, J. H. (1992). A strengths-based model of case management/advocacy: Adapting a mental health model to practice work with persons who have substance abuse problems. NIDA research monograph127, 79–91.Google Scholar
  31. Rogers, C. R. (1987). Rogers, Kohut and Erickson: A personal perspective on similarities and differences. In J. K. Zeig (Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy (pp. 179–187). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  32. Rogers, C. (2012). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  33. Saleebey, D. (2009). Introduction: Power to the people. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work (5th ed., pp. 1–23) Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  34. Sanchez-Way, R., & Johnson, S. (2000). Cultural practices in American Indian prevention programs. Juvenile Justice, 7(2), 20–30.Google Scholar
  35. Siegal, H. A., Rapp, R. C., Kelliher, C. W., Fisher, J. H., Wagner, J. H., & Cole, P. A. (1995). The strengths perspective of case management: A promising inpatient substance abuse treatment enhancement. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 27(1), 67–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Siegal, H. A., Rapp, R. C., Li, L., Saha, P., & Kirk, K. D. (1997). The role of case management in retaining clients in substance abuse treatment: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Drug Issues, 27(4), 821–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, D. C., Hall, J. A., Williams, J. K., An, H., & Gotman, N. (2006). Comparative efficacy of family and group treatment for adolescent substance abuse. The American Journal on Addictions, 15(s1), 131–136.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, D. C., & Hall, J. A. (2008). Strengths-oriented family therapy for adolescents with substance abuse problems. Social Work, 53(2), 185–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Darling, N., Mounts, N. S., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1994). Over-time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 65(3), 754–770.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Townsend, A. L., Biegel, D. E., Ishler, K. J., Wieder, B., & Rini, A. (2006). Families of persons with substance use and mental disorders: A literature review and conceptual framework. Family Relations, 55(4), 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. United Nations Office on Drug and Crime. (2016). World drug report (Sales No. E.16.XI.7). United Nations: United Nations Publication.Google Scholar
  42. Wagner, C. C., & Ingersoll, K. S. (2008). Beyond cognition: Broadening the emotional base of motivational interviewing. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 18(2), 191,206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Wallerstein, N., Duran, B. (2008). The theoretical, historical, and practice roots of CBPR. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (2nd ed., pp. 25–66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Williams, J. R. (1976). Effects of labeling the “Drug-Abuser”. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  45. World Health Organization. (2004). Global status report on alcohol 2004. Geneva: WHO Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Smith, D. C., Hall, J. A., Williams, J. K., An, H., & Gotman, N. (2006). Comparative efficacy of family and group treatment for adolescent substance abuse. The American Journal on Addictions, 15(s1).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Academy of Psychology (NAOP) India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Addiction MedicineNational Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS)BangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Clinical PsychologyNational Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS)BangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations