Abstract
Ethnic assertion dominates contemporary social and political discourses among the Khasi—a matrilineal tribe in the north-eastern state of Meghalaya, India. The matrilineal system in Khasi society provides the context for understanding ethnic identity and gender relations. This paper utilizes the theoretical framework of identity process theory (IPT) to understand and explain ethnic identification of the Khasi. Newspaper discourses on Khasi society and identity are subjected to critical discourse analysis. The corpus for the present study comprises articles from newspapers—regional, national and overseas that informs about Khasi people and their collective life. The paper not only examines the representation of the Khasi in newspaper discourses, but motivational principles of identity, twin processes of assimilation–accommodation and evaluation postulated in IPT are discussed in the light of their identity. Finally, the adequacy of IPT to explain identity threat among the Khasi is also looked at.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baruah, A. K. (2004). Ethnic conflicts and traditional self-governing institutions: A study of Laitumkhrah dorbar. Crisis States Program Working Papers Series No. 39, Development Research Centre, DESTIN, London.
Bhushan, C. (2004). Terrorism and separatism in North-East India. New Delhi: Kalpaz.
Bouissou, J. (2011). Where women of India rule the roost and men demand gender equality. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com.
Breakwell, G. M. (1986). Coping with threatened identities. London: Methuen.
Breakwell, G. M. (1992). Processes of self-valuation: efficacy and estrangement. In G. M. Breakwell (Ed.), Social psychology of identity and the self concept (pp. 35–55). London: Academic Press/Surrey University Press.
Breakwell, G. M. (1993). Social representations and social identity. Papers on Social Representations, 2(3), 198–217.
Breakwell, G. M. (1996). Identity processes and social changes. In G. M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European identities: Socio-psychological analyses of social change (pp. 13–30). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Breakwell, G. M. (2001). Social representational constraints upon identity processes. In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 271–284). Oxford: Blackwell.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93.
Chacko, P. M. (1998). Matrilineal system: Some structural implications. In P. M. Chacko (Ed.), Matriliny in Meghalaya: Tradition and change (pp. 10–15). Regency: New Delhi.
Dhillon, A. (2013). Tribe faces push for men’s rights. The Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.thesydneymorningherald.com.
Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 699–724.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1999). Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.
Ghosh, P. (2015). Are women really equal in the matrilineal society of Meghalaya? Hindustan Times. http://www.hindustantimes.com.
Gopal, K. (2004). Islamic fundamentalism in Bangladesh and its role in the North-East insurgency. In D. Sengupta & S. K. Singh (Eds.), Insurgency in North-East India (pp. 171–198). Delhi: Authors Press/Spandan.
Hazarika, S. (1995). Strangers in the mist: Tales of war and peace from India’s Northeast. New Delhi: Penguin.
Jaspal, R., & Cinnirella, M. (2010). Coping with potentially incompatible identities: accounts of religious, ethnic and sexual identities from British Pakistani men who identify as Muslim and gay. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 849–870.
Jaspal, R., & Cinnirella, M. (2012). The construction of ethnic identity: Insights from identity process theory. Ethnicities, 12(5), 503–530.
Jaspal, R., & Coyle, A. (2009). Reconciling social psychology and sociolinguistics can have some benefits: Language and identity among second generation British Asians. Social Psychological Review, 11(2), 3–14.
Jaswal, I. J. S. (1982). The Seng Khasi. In K. S. Singh (Ed.), Tribal movements in India (Vol. 1). New Delhi: Manohar.
Krishna, S. (2004). Gender, tribe and political participation: Control of natural resources in North-eastern India. In S. Krishna (Ed.), Livelihood and gender: Equity in community resource management. New Delhi: Sage.
LeVine, R. A., & Campell, C. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism. New York: Wiley.
Lyngdoh, F. (2015). Whither the Khasi hills? The Shillong Times. http://www.theshillongtimes.com.
Lyons, E. (1996). Coping with social change: processes of social memory in their construction of identities. In G. M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European identities: Socio-psychological analyses of social change (pp. 31–40). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Marwein, O. B. (2016). Heads they win, tails we lose. The Shillong Times. http://www.theshillongtimes.com.
McDuie-Ra, D. (2007). Anti-development or identity crisis? Misreading civil society in Meghalaya, India. Asian Ethnicity, 8(1), 43–45.
Men cry discrimination in Indian tribe where women run the show. (2013). The Japan Times. Retrieved from http://www.thejapantimes.com.
Milton, N. (2014). Momma’s girls. The Tribune. http://www.thetribune.com.
Mohrmen, H. H. (2013). Indian by choice and the Khasi cultural awakening. The Shillong Times. http://www.theshillongtimes.com.
Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250.
Moscovici, S., & Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanations: From the “naive” to the “amateur” scientist. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory: Social and functional extensions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mukhim, P. (2014). The women’s world. The Pioneer. http://www.thepioneer.com.
Nongbri, T. (2003). Development, ethnicity and gender. Jaipur/New Delhi: Rawat.
Nongkynrih, A. K. (2002). Khasi society of Meghalaya: A sociological understanding. New Delhi: Indus.
Pereira, C., Vala, J., & Costa-Lopes, R. (2010). From prejudice to discrimination: The legitimizing role of perceived threat in discrimination against migrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1231–1250.
Sen Gupta, S. (2005). Regionalism in Meghalaya. New Delhi: South Asian.
Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Singh, B. P. (1987). The problem of change: A study of North-East India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Stephan, W. G., & Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 191–207). New York: Psychology Press.
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Tse, L. (1998). Ethnic identity formation and its implications for heritage language development. In S. D. Krashen, L. Tse, & J. McQuillan (Eds.), heritage language development. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Episodic models in discourse processing. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language. New York: Academic Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schaffner & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (pp. 17–33). Dartmouth: Aldershot.
Vignoles, V. L., Regalia, C., Manzi, C., Golledge, J., & Scabini, E. (2006). Beyond self-esteem: Influence of multiple motives on identity construction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 308–333.
War, J. (1998). Panchayati raj and traditional Khasi institutions: A comparison. In M. N. Karna, L. S. Gassah, & C. J. Thomas (Eds.), Power to people in Meghalaya (pp. 69–82). Regency: New Delhi.
Wodak, R., & Ludwig, C. (Eds.). (1999). Challenges in a changing world: Issues in critical discourse analysis. Vienna: Passagenverlag.
Wodak, R., Nowak, P., Pelikan, J., Gruber, H., de Cillia, R., & Mitten, R. (1990). Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter. Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus [We are all innocent perpetrators. Discourse Historic Studies in Postwar Antisemitism]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kharshiing, K.D. Explicating Ethnic Identity of the Khasi in North-East India through the Lens of the Identity Process Theory. Psychol Stud 61, 197–210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0363-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0363-9