Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the Separation of Task-Based and Self-Based Achievement Goals in a Philippine Sample

  • Research in Progress
  • Published:
Psychological Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 3 × 2 achievement goal model separates the mastery goal construct into task-based and self-based achievement goals. Using data primarily gathered from self-report questionnaires administered to a sample of Filipino college students from the Philippines, the present research investigated the structural validity of task-based goals and self-based goals and their association with previously examined antecedent and consequent variables of mastery goals (task value, self-efficacy, test hope, test anxiety, test performance). While results from the data analyses were mixed, the results provided some evidence on the structural and predictive validity of task-based and self-based achievement goals in the Philippine sample. Moreover, the present research did not only provide some support for the separation of task-based and self-based goals but also highlighted the benefits of both task-based goals and self-based goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi:10.1037/0022–0663.84.3.261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706–722. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, A. B. I. (2004). Culturally-rooted beliefs and learning: Exploring the relationships among social axioms, achievement goals, and learning strategies of Filipino college students. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, A. B. I. (2008). Individual and social dimensions of Filipino students’ achievement goals. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 886–891. doi:10.1080/00207590701837834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, A. B. I., & Ismail, R. (2010). Social perceptions of achieving students and achievement goals of students in Malaysia and the Philippines. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 385–407. doi:10.1007/s11218-010-9118-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Newall, N. E (2009). A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 948–963. doi:10.1037/a0016096

  • David, A. P. (2012). Structural validation of the 3 x 2 achievement goal model. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 3, 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dela Rosa,. (2010). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework and intrinsic motivation among Filipino students: A validation study. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 1, 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189. doi:10.1207/s153266985ep3403_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A.J., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218

  • Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A.J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501

  • Elliot, A.J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 x 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632648. doi: 10.1037/a0023952

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139–156. doi:10.1023/A:1009057102306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 3, 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S., Liem, A. D., & Nie, Y. (2008). Task- and self-related pathways to deep learning: The mediating role of achievement goals, classroom attentiveness, and group participation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 639–662. doi:10.1348/000709907X270261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liem, A. D., & Nie, Y. (2008). Values, achievement goals, and individual-oriented and social-oriented achievement motivations among Chinese and Indonesian secondary school students. International Journal of Psychology, 43(5), 898–903. doi:10.1080/00207590701838097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting cognitive engagement, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maehr, M. (1989). Thoughts about motivation. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 299–315). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magno, C., & Lajom, J. (2008). Self-regulation, self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement goals in high school and college adolescents. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 41, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals. Good for what, good for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77– 86. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77

  • Murayama, K., Elliot, A., & Yamagata, S. (2011). Separation of performance-approach and performance-avoidance achievement goals: A broader analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 238–256. doi:10.1037/a0021948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583–597. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135. doi:10.1037/a0013383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R.P. (2005). Academic Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). User’s Manual. Munich, Germany: Department of Psychology, University of Munich

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, A., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555. doi:10. I037//0022O663.92.3.544

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Muller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, V., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2000). A meaning system approach to Chinese students’ achievement goals. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 1, 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310.

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adonis P. David.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

David, A.P. Analysis of the Separation of Task-Based and Self-Based Achievement Goals in a Philippine Sample. Psychol Stud 59, 365–373 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-014-0266-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-014-0266-6

Keywords

Navigation