Abstract
The 3 × 2 achievement goal model separates the mastery goal construct into task-based and self-based achievement goals. Using data primarily gathered from self-report questionnaires administered to a sample of Filipino college students from the Philippines, the present research investigated the structural validity of task-based goals and self-based goals and their association with previously examined antecedent and consequent variables of mastery goals (task value, self-efficacy, test hope, test anxiety, test performance). While results from the data analyses were mixed, the results provided some evidence on the structural and predictive validity of task-based and self-based achievement goals in the Philippine sample. Moreover, the present research did not only provide some support for the separation of task-based and self-based goals but also highlighted the benefits of both task-based goals and self-based goals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi:10.1037/0022–0663.84.3.261.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260.
Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706–722. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.706.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2004). Culturally-rooted beliefs and learning: Exploring the relationships among social axioms, achievement goals, and learning strategies of Filipino college students. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 79–100.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2008). Individual and social dimensions of Filipino students’ achievement goals. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 886–891. doi:10.1080/00207590701837834.
Bernardo, A. B. I., & Ismail, R. (2010). Social perceptions of achieving students and achievement goals of students in Malaysia and the Philippines. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 385–407. doi:10.1007/s11218-010-9118-y.
Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Newall, N. E (2009). A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 948–963. doi:10.1037/a0016096
David, A. P. (2012). Structural validation of the 3 x 2 achievement goal model. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 3, 50–59.
Dela Rosa,. (2010). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework and intrinsic motivation among Filipino students: A validation study. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 1, 48–58.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Elliot, A. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189. doi:10.1207/s153266985ep3403_3.
Elliot, A.J., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461.
Elliot, A.J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
Elliot, A.J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 x 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632–648. doi: 10.1037/a0023952
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139–156. doi:10.1023/A:1009057102306.
Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 3, 76–83.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
Lau, S., Liem, A. D., & Nie, Y. (2008). Task- and self-related pathways to deep learning: The mediating role of achievement goals, classroom attentiveness, and group participation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 639–662. doi:10.1348/000709907X270261.
Liem, A. D., & Nie, Y. (2008). Values, achievement goals, and individual-oriented and social-oriented achievement motivations among Chinese and Indonesian secondary school students. International Journal of Psychology, 43(5), 898–903. doi:10.1080/00207590701838097.
Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting cognitive engagement, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001.
Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.197.
Maehr, M. (1989). Thoughts about motivation. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 299–315). New York: Academic.
Magno, C., & Lajom, J. (2008). Self-regulation, self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement goals in high school and college adolescents. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 41, 1–23.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals. Good for what, good for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77– 86. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77
Murayama, K., Elliot, A., & Yamagata, S. (2011). Separation of performance-approach and performance-avoidance achievement goals: A broader analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 238–256. doi:10.1037/a0021948.
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583–597. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583.
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135. doi:10.1037/a0013383.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R.P. (2005). Academic Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). User’s Manual. Munich, Germany: Department of Psychology, University of Munich
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, A., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555. doi:10. I037//0022O663.92.3.544
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Muller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
Tao, V., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2000). A meaning system approach to Chinese students’ achievement goals. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 1, 13–38.
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
David, A.P. Analysis of the Separation of Task-Based and Self-Based Achievement Goals in a Philippine Sample. Psychol Stud 59, 365–373 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-014-0266-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-014-0266-6