Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘Bridging’ and ‘Exit’ as Metaphors of Multilingual Education: A Constructionist Analysis

  • Research in Progress
  • Published:
Psychological Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using social constructionist perspective this paper critically examines the multilingual education (MLE) discourse and practices in the Indian states of Odisha and Andhra Pradesh. The choice of MLE model is influenced by the construction of the problem of tribal children’s learning as ‘poor’ or ‘inadequate’ bridging between the language and concepts used in everyday life and school. ‘Bridging’ and ‘exit’, therefore, became key metaphors of MLE programmes. The discursive embedding of these metaphors in the policy documents indicates that they are political and serve to fulfill the mandates of the constitution of India and policy frameworks for early education in mother tongue without subverting the language hierarchy or the majority-centric school education. The current MLE programmes lack pedagogy of critique and limit the scope for reflexive deliberations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, N. (1999). An African renaissance without African languages. Social Dynamics, 25(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1982). Education and power. London: Routledge, Kagan & Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodern education: Politics, culture and social criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamgbose, A. (2000). Language and exclusion: The consequences of language policies in Africa. London: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lenham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, L. E., & Apple, M. W. (Eds.). (1988). The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. London: Routledge Kagan & Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Bruner, J. S. (1971). Cultural differences and inferences about psychological process. American Psychologist, 26, 867–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., Gay, J., & Glick, J. (1968). Reversal and nonreversal shifts among Liberian tribal people. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 323–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (2009). Fundamental psychological and sociological principles underlying educational success for linguistic minority students. In A. Mohanty, M. Panda, R. Phillipson, & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local (pp. 21–35). New Delhi: Orient Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friere, P. (1978). The pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2001). Social construction in context. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2003). Social construction: A reader. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugh, K., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2010). Multilingual education works: From the periphery to the centre. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, R. C., Sinha, D., & Berry, J. W. (1996). Ecology, acculturation and psychological adaptation: A study of adivasis in Bihar. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, A. K. (1994). Bilingualism in a multilingual society. Psychosocial and pedagogical implications. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, A. K. (2010a). Languages, inequality and marginalization: implications of the double divide in Indian multilingualism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 205, 131–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, A. K. (2010b). Language policy and practice in education: Negotiating the double divide in multilingual societies. In K. Heugh & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual education works (pp. 164–175). New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, A. K. (2011). Multilingual education in India. Swara, 1(5), 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, A. K., Mishra, M. K., Reddy, N. U., & Ramesh, G. (2009). Overcoming the language barrier for tribal children: MLE in Andhra Pradesh and Orissa, India. In A. Mohanty, M. Panda, R. Phillipson, & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local (pp. 278–291). New Delhi: Orient Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Knowledge Commission. (2009). National Knowledge Commission Report to the Nation 2006–2009. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCERT. (2005). National Curriculum Framework 2005. New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCERT. (2006). Position Paper on the Teaching of Indian Languages. New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, M. (1996). Social and personal identity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.

  • Panda, M. (2004). Culture and mathematics: A case study of Saoras. In K. Chanana (Ed.), Transformative links between higher education and basic education: Mapping the field (pp. 119–132). New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, M. (2007). Saora culture, as-if discourse and mathematics learning. In G. Zheng, K. Leung, & J. Adair (Eds.), Perspectives and progress in contemporary cross-cultural psychology (pp. 359–369). Beijing: China Light Industry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, M. (2009). Discriminating against mother tongue. Combat Law, May–August, 120–122.

  • Panda, M. (2011a). Editorial. Swara, 1(4), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, M. (2011b). Editorial. Swara, 1(6–7), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, M. (2012). Report of the Task force on “Issues in education of tribal children” (12th Five-year plan). New Delhi: Planning Commission of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, M., & Cole, M. (2007). As-if discourse, intersubjectivity and mathematics learning in schools: Swapping between two discourses. 2nd Socio-cultural Theory in Educational Research and Practice Conference, University of Manchester, UK. http://www.education.manchester.ac.uk/research/centres/lta/LTAResearch/SocioculturalTheoryInterestGroupScTiG.

  • Panda, M., & Mohanty, A. (2009). Language matters, so does culture: Beyond the rhetoric of culture in multilingual education. In A. Mohanty, M. Panda, R. Phillipson, & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local(pp (pp. 295–312). New Delhi: Orient Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2011). From mother tongue to other tongue: Multilingual education of tribal children in India. New Delhi: ZHCES-BvLF Project Report, Jawaharlal Nehru University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda, M., Mohanty, A. K., Nag, S., & Biswabandan, B. (2011). Does MLE work in Andhra Pradesh and Odisha? A longitudinal study. Swara, 1(6–7), 2–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, T. (1998). Language and politics in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

  • Shohamy, E. (2010). Cases of language policy resistance in Israel’s centralized educational system. In K. Menken & O. Garcia (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policy makers (pp. 182–197). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Mohanty, A. K. (2009). Policy and strategy for MLE in Nepal, report by Tove Skutnabb-Kangas and Ajit Mohanty Consultancy visit 4–14 March 2009. Sanothimi, Bhaktapur, Nepal: MLE Program, Ministry of Education.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minati Panda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panda, M. ‘Bridging’ and ‘Exit’ as Metaphors of Multilingual Education: A Constructionist Analysis. Psychol Stud 57, 240–250 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-012-0149-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-012-0149-7

Keywords

Navigation