Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Generic customer segments and business models for smart grids

Empirical evidence from a cross-European country study

  • Special Issue: Value to the Customer
  • Published:
der markt

Abstract

The implementation of smart grids—one of the urgent goals to meet international policy expectations for energy efficiency and CO2 reduction targets—is not a technological issue alone, as it also requires social acceptance by various stakeholders (Wolsink, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2011). It is of particular interest that smart grid products and services provide value to the customer. On the one hand, customer value of smart grid technologies is crucial to customer acceptance. On the other hand, as customer value is a key driver for economic value creation and competitive advantage (DeSarbo et al., Strategic Manag J 22:845–857, 2001; Porter, Competitive advantage, 1985), it is also important for companies and investors and thus will affect market acceptance of smart grid technologies. In the literature, business models address the bridge between customers and company needs and serve as mediators between technology and economic success by providing a value proposition to customers and a revenue model for companies (Chesbrough and Rosenbloom, Ind Corp Chang 11:529–555, 2002). However, we know from the literature that a one-size-fits-all business model may not lead to the best results as it might fail to address heterogeneous customer value perceptions (DeSarbo et al., Strategic Manag J 22:845–857, 2001; Morris et al., J Bus Res 58:726–735, 2005; Ruiz et al., Serv Ind J 27:1087–1110, 2007; Wiedmann et al., Psychol Mark 26:625–651, 2009). Thus, different business models providing different customer value propositions need to be developed to fit the different market segments in an optimal way. On the basis of a cross-European country study, we explore three generic B2C customer segments for smart grid products and services based on different value perceptions (Supporters, Ambiguous and Skeptics). Based on the segmentation we conceptually derive four generic business model designs with different customer value propositions best suited for approaching those segments (Saver, Smart +, Trader, Smart Camouflage). Implications for energy policy, research and smart grid management are derived from the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There is no unique solution on how to allocate party preferences across national borders. In this study, parties were chosen that are similar to political groups in Switzerland and in the European Parliament.

  2. The remaining 6.4% did not provide information.

  3. The remaining 5.9% did not provide information regarding their gender.

References

  • Backhaus K, Erichson B, Wulff P, Weiber R (2003) Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Belz C, Bieger T (2006) Customer Value: Kundenvorteile schaffen Unternehmensvorteile. mi-Fachverlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Better Place (2011) http://www.betterplace.com/. Accessed 10 Sept 2011

  • Bogoslaw D (2010) Smart Grid’s $ 200 Billion Investement Lures Cisco, ABB.http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/sep2010/pi20100923_666771.htm. Accessed 22 Sept 2011

  • Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE (2007) Competing Through Business Models. Working Paper No. 713. IESE Business School. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1115201. Accessed 14 Oct 2010

  • Chesbrough H (2007a) Business model innovation: It’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy Leadersh 35(6):12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2007b) Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48(2):22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom RS (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Ind Corp Chang 11(3):529–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clastres C (2011) Smart grids: Another step towards competition, energy security and climate change objectives. Energy Policy 39:5399–5408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cometta C, Hannich F, Rauh M (2010) Smart Metering: Kein Thema für Schweizer Energieversorger?; Kommentierte Ergebnisse einer Studie der ZHAW/Verband Schweizerischer Elektrizitätsunternehmen (VSE) (Ed.)-: VSE, 1012s. (Bulletin SEV/VSE)

  • Daoud M, Fernando X (2011) On the communication requirements for the smart grid. Energy Power Eng 3:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo WS, Jedidi K, Sinha I (2001) Customer value analysis in a heterogeneous market. Strategic Manag J 22:845–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibb S, Stern P, Wensley R (2002) Marketing knowledge and the value of segmentation. Mark Intell Plan 20(2):113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DISTRES (2009) Promotion and Consolidation of all RTD Activities for Renewable distributed Generation Technologies in the Mediterranean Region, Task 2.2: Business Models and Market Entry Strategies. Copenhagen Business School/University of St. Gallen

  • ETP—European Technology Platform SmartGrids (2010) Strategic deployment document for Europe’s electricity networks of the future.http://www.smartgrids.eu/documents/SmartGrids_SDD_FINAL_APRIL2010.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2011

  • European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0016:0062:en:PDF. Accessed 20 Sept 2011

  • Faruqui A, Hledik R, Sergici S (2009) Piloting the Smart Grid. Electr J 22(7):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsa (ed.) Gesellschaft für Sozialforschung und statistische Analysen mbH (2010) Erfolgsfaktoren von Smart Metering aus Verbrauchersicht. http://www.vzbv.de/mediapics/smart_metering_studie_05_2010.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2011

  • Frantzis L, Graham S, Katofsky R, Sawyer H (2008) Photovoltaics business models. National renewable energy laboratory, Burlington. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/pdfs/42304.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2011

  • Hedman J, Kalling T (2003) The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. Eur J Inf Syst 12(1):49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook MB (Ed.) (1999) Consumer value. A framework for analysis and research. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IEA—International Energy Agency (2010a) Energy technology perspectives 2010- Executive summary.http://www.iea.org/techno/etp/etp10/English.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2011

  • IEA—International Energy Agency (2010b) Energy technology perspectives 2010- Key graphs.http://www.iea.org/techno/etp/etp10/key_figures.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2011

  • Johnson MW, Suskewicz J (2009). How to jump-start the clean tech economy. Harv Bus Rev 87(11):52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H (2008) Reinventing your business model. Harv Bus Rev 86(12):51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagermann H, Österle H (2006) Geschäftsmodelle 2010- Wie CEOs Unternehmen transformieren. Ecological Economics. Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann S (2010) Kundenpräferenzen für Smart Metering. MA Thesis, University of St Gallen

  • Kim H-W, Chan HC, Gupta S (2007) Value-based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation. Decis Support Syst 43:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P (1997) Marketing management: Analysis, planning and control, 9th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranz J, Gallenkamp J, Picot A (2010) Exploring the Role of Control—Smart Meter Acceptance of Residential Consumers. Proceedings of the 16th American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) Lima (August 12–15, 2010):1–9

  • Lastovicka JL, Gardner DM (1978) Low involvement versus high involvement cognitive structures. In: Hunt KH (ed) Advances in consumer research, vol 5. Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 87–92

  • Laurent G, Kapferer J-N (1985) Measuring consumer involvement profiles. J Mark Res 22(1):41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loock M (2011a) Going beyond best technology and lowest price: On renewable energy investors’ preference for service-driven business models. Energy Policy In Press, Corrected Proof

  • Loock M (2011b) How do business models impact financial performance of renewable energy firms? In: Wuebker R, Wüstenhagen R (eds) Handbook of research on energy entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing, Chettenham, pp 229–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Magretta J (2002) Why business models matter. Harv Bus Rev 80:86–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1986) Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis. Strategic Manag J 7(3):233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1996) Configurations revisited. Strategic Manag J 17(7):505–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris M, Schindehutte M, Allen J (2005) The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. J Bus Res 58:726–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A (1997) Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer value. J Acad Mark Sci 25(2):154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PikeResearch (2009) Smart Grid Investement to Total $ 200 Billion Worldwide by 2015.http://www.pikeresearch.com/newsroom/smart-grid-investment-to-total-200-billion-worldwide-by-2015. Accessed 20 Sept 2011

  • Porter M (1985) Competitive advantage. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz DM, Barrosso Castro C, Armario EM (2007) Explaining market heterogeneity in terms of value perceptions. Serv Ind J 27(8):1087–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust RT, Zeithaml VA, Lemon KN (2000) Driving customer equity. How customer lifetime value is reshaping corporate strategy. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoettl J-M, Lehmann-Ortega L (2011) Photovoltaic business models: Threat or opportunity for utilities? In: Wüstenhagen R, Wuebker R (eds) Handbook of research on energy entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing, Chettenham, pp 145–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer L (2005) Concept and evolution of business models. J Gen Manag 31(2):37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth JN, Newman BI, Gross BL (1991) Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. J Bus Res 22:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater S (1997) Developing a customer value-based theory of the firm. J Acad Mark Sci 25(2):162–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strategier J, Hauttekeete L, De Marez L (2010) Introducing Smart grids in residential contexts: Consumers perception of smart household appliances. Proceedings of Innovative Technologies for an Efficient and Reliable Electricity Supply (CITRES), 2010 IEEE Conference, Waltham, MA (September 27–29, 2010):135–142

  • Treacy M, Wiersema F (1995) The discipline of market leaders, vol 9. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turel O, Serenko A, Bontis N (2010) User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: A theory of consumption values perspective. Inf Manag 47:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill P, Malone T, D’Urso V, Herman G, Woerner S (2005) Do Some Business Models Perform Better than Others? A Study of the 1000 Largest US Firms. Working Paper No 226. MIT Sloan School of Management, MIT Center for Coordination Science.http://ccs.mit.edu/papers/pdf/wp226.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2009

  • Wiedmann K-P, Hennigs N, Siebels A (2009) Value-Based segmentation of luxury consumption behavior. Psychol Mark 26(7):625–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink M (2011) The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006

  • Woodruff R (1997) Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. J Acad Mark Sci 25(2):139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen R, Boehnke J (2008) Business models for sustainable energy. In: Tukker A, Charter M, Vezzoli C, Sto E, Andersen MM (eds) system innovation for sustainability 1. perspectives on radical changes to Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP). Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp 85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer M-J (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35:2683–2691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mar 52(3):2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott C, Amit R (2007) Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Org Sci 18(2):181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott C, Amit R (2008) The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Manag J 29(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott C, Amit R (2010) Designing your future business model: An activity system perspective. Long Range Plan Special 43:216–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Economy and the Environment (IWÖ-HSG), University of St. Gallen, Tigerbergstr. 2, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Hans C. Curtius, Karoline Künzel & Moritz Loock

Authors
  1. Hans C. Curtius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karoline Künzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Moritz Loock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moritz Loock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curtius, H., Künzel, K. & Loock, M. Generic customer segments and business models for smart grids. markt 51, 63–74 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12642-012-0076-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12642-012-0076-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation