Abstract
Attractant sex pheromone (ASP) 2,6-dichloro phenol was used in the current study to evaluate the percentage attraction and the behavioural responses of the five ixodid tick species namely Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Rhipicephalus microplus (Boophilus microplus), Haemaphysalis bispinosa, Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides and Hyalomma marginatum using petridish bioassay. Two concentrations of 2,6-DCP (0.1 M and 0.05 M) was used for the larval stages of all five ixodid tick species of which 0.1 M concentration was found to have maximum attraction. Trials with 0.1 M ASP revealed highest per cent of attraction in R. sanguineus larvae (71 %) followed by H. bispinosa (55 %) and R. microplus (55 %). With 0.1 M ASP R. haemaphysaloides and H. marginatum showed least attraction (39 % each). However the per cent of attraction of R. haemaphysaloides was higher (46 %) with 0.05 M ASP. Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference in per cent of attraction between the different tick larvae using 0.05 and 0.1 M ASP. The larvae also exhibited behavioural responses such as feeding, probing, resting and questing posture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borges LMF, Eiras AE, Ferri PH, Lobo ACC (2002) The role of 2,6-dichlorophenol as sex pheromone of the tropical horse tick Anocentor nitens (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp Appl Acarol 27:223–230
Dipeolu OO, Ndungu JN (1991) Acaricidal activity of “kupetaba” a ground mixture of natural products against Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Vet Parasitol 38:327–338
Ghosh S, Azhahianambi P, Yadav MP (2007) Upcoming and future strategies of tick control: a review. J Vector Borne Dis 44:79–89
Haggart DA, Davis EE (1981) Neurons sensitive to 2,6-dichlorophenol on the tarsi of the tick, Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 18:187–193
Jabbar A, Alp H, Aksin M, Seitzer U (2007) Current status of ticks in Asia. Parasitol Res 101(2):S159–S162
Norval RAI, Peter T, Yunker CE, Sonenshine DE, Burridge MJ (1991) Response of the ticks Amblyomma hebraeum and A. variegatum to known or potential components of the aggregation–attachment pheromone. I. Long range attraction. Exp Appl Acarol 13:11–18
Sonenshine DE (1991) Biology of ticks, vol 1. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 225–227
Sonenshine DE (1993) Biology of ticks, vol 2. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 447–456
Sonenshine DE (2003) Chemical composition of some components of the arrestment pheromone of the black-legged tick, Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) and their use in tick control. J Med Entomol 40(6):849–859
Sonenshine DE (2004) Pheromones and other semiochemicals of tick and their use in tick control. Parasitology 129:S405–S425
Sonenshine DE (2006) Tick pheromones and their use in their control. Annu Rev Entomol 51:557–580
Sonenshine DE, Taylor D, Corrigan G (1985) Studies to evaluate the effectiveness of sex pheromone-impregnated formulations for control of populations of the American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Say) (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp Appl Acarol 1:23–34
Yoder JA, Stevens BW (2000) Attraction of immature stages of the American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis) to 2,6-dichlorophenol. Exp Appl Acarol 24:159–164
Yoder JA, Atwood AD, Stevens BN (1998) Attraction to squalene by ticks (Acari: Ixodidae): first demonstration of a host derived attractant. Int J Acarol 24:159–164
Yoder JA, Hanson PE, Pizzuli JL, Sanders CI, Domingus JL (2002) Sex Pheromone production and its relationship to water conservation: studies on a trichlorophenol in the American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae). Int J Acarol 28:379–385
Ziv M, Sonenshine DE, Silverstein RM, West JR, Gingher KH (1981) Use of Sex Pheromone, 2,6-dichlorophenol, to disrupt mating by American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Say). J Chem Ecol 7:829–840
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ranju, R.S., Latha, B.R., Leela, V. et al. Effect of attractant sex pheromone on immature larval stages of ixodid tick species. J Parasit Dis 36, 155–158 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-012-0140-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-012-0140-1