Body Contouring ohne Skalpell umfasst neue Behandlungsformen in der Ästhetischen Medizin, die sich hoher Nachfrage erfreuen. Insbesondere Patienten mit Bedenken gegenüber operativen plastisch-chirurgischen Verfahren oder Kontraindikationen zum operativen Eingriff wählen nicht operative Methoden. Neben den bisher etablierten Verfahren existiert eine ganze Reihe neuer Optionen, mit denen die Körperformung oder besser gesagt die Fettreduktion, die dann eine Körperformung vornimmt, gelingt. Hier sollen verschiedene nicht invasive Methoden beschrieben und gegeneinander abgewogen werden.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Rzepecki AK et al. Update on noninvasive body contouring techniques. Cutis. 2018; 101: 285–8
Decorato JW et al. Subcutaneous adipose tissue response to a non-invasive hyperthermic treatment using a 1,060 nm laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2017; 49: 480–9
Schilling L et al. 1060 nm Diode Hyperthermic Laser Lipolysis:The Latest in Non-Invasive Body Contouring. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017; 16: 48–52
Bass LS, Doherty ST. Safety and Efficacy of a Non-Invasive 1060 nm Diode Laser for Fat Reduction of the Abdomen. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018; 17: 106–12
Sweeney DL et al. Combined Hyperthermic 1060nm Diode Laser Lipolysis With Topical Skin Tightening Treatment: Case Series. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018; 17: 780–5
Jackson RF et al. Low-level laser therapy as a non-invasive approach for body contouring: a randomized, controlled study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009; 41: 799–809
Jankowski M et al. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not reduce subcutaneous adipose tissue by local adipocyte injury but rather by modulation of systemic lipid metabolism. Lasers Med Sci. 2017; 32: 475–9
Avci P et al. Low-level laser therapy for fat layer reduction: a comprehensive review. Lasers Surg Med. 2013; 45: 349–57
Zelickson BD et al. Cryolipolysis for safe and effective inner thigh fat reduction. Lasers Surg Med. 2015; 47: 120–7
Bernstein EF, Bloom JD. Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Submental Cryolipolysis With Quantified 3-Dimensional Imaging of Fat Reduction and Skin Tightening. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017; 19: 350–7
Kilmer SL et al. Safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for non-invasive reduction of submental fat. Lasers Surg Med. 2016; 48: 3–13
Ho D, Jagdeo J. A Systematic Review of Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia (PAH) Post-Cryolipolysis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017; 16: 62–7
Kilmer SL. Prototype CoolCup cryolipolysis applicator with over 40 % reduced treatment time demonstrates equivalent safety and efficacy with greater patient preference. Lasers Surg Med. 2017; 49: 63–8
Klein KB et al. Multiple same day cryolipolysis treatments for the reduction of subcutaneous fat are safe and do not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests. Lasers Surg Med. 2017; 49: 640–4
Ingargiola MJ et al. Cryolipolysis for fat reduction and body contouring: safety and efficacy of current treatment paradigms. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135: 1581–90
Downie J, Kaspar M. Contactless Abdominal Fat Reduction With Selective RF Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Case Study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016; 15: 491–5
Gold MH et al. A randomized, controlled multicenter study evaluating focused ultrasound treatment for fat reduction in the flanks. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018; 13: 1–5
Guth F et al. Immediate effect and safety of HIFU single treatment for male subcutaneous fat reduction. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018; 17: 385–9
Kinney BM, Lozanova P. High intensity focused electromagnetic therapy evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging: Safety and efficacy study of a dual tissue effect based non-invasive abdominal body shaping. Lasers Surg Med. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23024
Jacob CI, Paskova K. Safety and efficacy of a novel high-intensity focused electromagnetic technology device for noninvasive abdominal body shaping. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018; 17: 783–7
Ascher B et al. Efficacy, patient-reported outcomes and safety profile of ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid), an injectable drug for the reduction of unwanted submental fat: results from a phase III, randomized, placebocontrolled study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014; 28: 1707–15
Rzany B et al. Reduction of unwanted submental fat with ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid), an adipocytolytic injectable treatment: results from a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Br J Dermatol. 2014; 170: 445–53
Ascher B et al. ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid injection) for reduction of submental fat. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016; 9: 1131–43
Dover JS et al. Management of Patient Experience With ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid Injection) for Reduction of Submental Fat. Dermatol Surg. 2016; 42 Suppl 1: S288–99
Wollina U, Goldman A. ATX-101 for reduction of submental fat. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015; 16: 755–62
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quist, J., Quist, S.R. Nicht invasive Verfahren zur Lipolyse. ästhet dermatol kosmetol 10, 22–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12634-018-5704-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12634-018-5704-3