Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Schaumsklerosierung

Anwendung und Indikation in der Dermatologie und Phlebologie

  • cme fortbildung
  • Published:
ästhetische dermatologie & kosmetologie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die Schaumsklerosierung ist eine wenig invasive, effektive Technik zur Behandlung von Varizen bis hin zu venösen Malformationen. Die Methode zeigt sich in der praktischen Anwendung als gut durchführbar und nebenwirkungsarm und ist eine Alternative zu den invasiveren Verfahren wie Venenstripping, endoluminale Laser-Therapie oder endoluminale Radiofrequenzablation ohne die Notwendigkeit einer Anästhesie. Die Behandlung kann ambulant durchgeführt werden, und die Patienten können unmittelbar in das alltägliche Leben zurückkehren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Hach W, Hach-Wunderle H (1994) Die Rezirkulationskreise der primären Varikose — pathophysiologische Grundlagen zur chirurgischen Therapie. Springer, Berlin, S 27–53

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Junger M, Hafner HM (2003) Interface pressure under a ready made compression stocking developed for the treatment of venous ulcers over a period of six weeks. Vasa 32:87–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Junger M, Wollina U, Kohnen R et al (2004) Efficacy and tolerability of an ulcer compression stocking for therapy of chronic venous ulcer compared with a below-knee compression bandage: results from a prospective, randomized, multicentre trial. Curr Med Res Opin 20:1613–1623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Neumann H (2011) Skin, veins and legs. Phlebologie 40:344–355

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bruning G, Altmann B (2011) Modern varicose vein surgery. Hautarzt 62:347–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perala J, Rautio T, Biancari F et al (2005) Radiofrequency endovenous obliteration versus stripping of the long saphenous vein in the management of primary varicose veins: 3-year outcome of a randomized study. Ann Vasc Surg 19:669–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pannier F, Rabe E, Maurins U (2009) First results with a new 1470-nm diode laser for endovenous ablation of incompetent saphenous veins. Phlebology 24:26–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Proebstle TM, Vago B, Alm J et al (2008) Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: first clinical experience. J Vasc Surg 47:151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spreafico G, Kabnick L, Berland TL et al (2011) Laser saphenous ablations in more than 1,000 limbs with long-term duplex examination follow-up. Ann Vasc Surg 25:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Proebstle TM, Alm J, Gockeritz O et al (2011) Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities. J Vasc Surg 54:146–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Helmy Elkaffas K, Elkashef O, Elbaz W (2010) Great saphenous vein radiofrequency ablation versus standard stripping in the management of primary varicose veins-a randomized clinical trial. Angiology 62:49–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goode SD, Chowdhury A, Crockett M et al (2010) Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:246–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Doganci S, Demirkilic U (2010) Comparison of 980 nm laser and bare-tip fibre with 1470 nm laser and radial fibre in the treatment of great saphenous vein varicosities: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:254–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Luebke T, Gawenda M, Heckenkamp J et al (2008) Meta-analysis of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of the great saphenous vein in primary varicosis. J Endovasc Ther 15:213–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabe E, Pannier F, Gerlach H (2008) Leitlinie: Sklerosierungsbehandlung der Varikose. Phlebologie 37:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kluessa HG, Noppeneya T, Breu FX et al (2010) Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie der Krampfadererkrankung. Phlebologie

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baccaglini U, Spreafico G, Castoro C et al (1996) Sclerotherapy of varicose veins of the lower limbs. Consensus paper. North American Society of Phlebology. Dermatol Surg 22:883–889

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thibault (2007) Sclerotherapy and ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy. In: Bergan J (Hrsg) The vein book. Elsevier, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pannier F, Rabe E (2006) Sclerotherapy for varicosities. Hautarzt 57:19–20, 22–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Breu F, Guggenbichler S, Wollmann JC (2008) 2nd European Consensus Meeting on Foam Sclerotherapy 2006, Tegernsee, Germany. Vasa 37(Suppl 71):1–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Monfreux A (1997) Traitement sclérosant des troncs saphèniens et leurs collatèrales de gros calibre par la méthode mus. Phlébologie 50:351–353

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cavezzi A, Tessari L (2009) Foam sclerotherapy techniques: different gases and methods of preparation, catheter versus direct injection. Phlebology 24(6):247–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tessari L, Cavezzi A, Frullini A (2001) Preliminary experience with a new sclerosing foam in the treatment of varicose veins. Dermatol Surg 27:58–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Barrett JM, Allen B, Ockelford A et al (2004) Microfoam ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of varicose veins in 100 legs. Dermatol Surg 30:6–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rabe E, Pannier-Fischer F, Gerlach H et al (2004) Guidelines for sclerotherapy of varicose veins (ICD 10: I83.0, I83.1, I83.2, and I83.9). Dermatol Surg 30:687–693, discussion 693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Blaise S, Bosson JL, Diamand JM (2010) Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein with 1% vs. 3% polidocanol foam: a multicentre double-blind randomised trial with 3-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39:779–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldman MP, Sadick NS, Weiss RA (1995) Cutaneous necrosis, telangiectatic matting, and hyperpigmentation following sclerotherapy. Etiology, prevention, and treatment. Dermatol Surg 21:19–29 quiz 31-12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guex JJ (2010) Complications of sclerotherapy: an update. Dermatol Surg 36(Suppl 2):1056–1063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Zumaeta-Garcia M et al (2011) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatments of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 53:49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stucker M, Kobus S, Altmeyer P et al (2010) Review of published information on foam sclerotherapy. Dermatol Surg 36(Suppl 2):983–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Erklärung zu Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heck, M., Schneider, S.W. Schaumsklerosierung. ästhet dermatol kosmetol 4, 29–38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12634-012-0310-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12634-012-0310-2

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation