Abstract
The bone, being an essential tissue in the human body, not only protects the organs inside the body but also provides mechanical support, haematopoiesis, mineral storage and mobility. Although bone may regenerate and heal itself, significant bone defects caused by severe trauma, tumour removal, malignancy, or congenital diseases can only be corrected via bone grafting. Bone biomaterials, also known as bone graft alternatives, have seen an increase in demand in recent years. Over 2 million procedures are performed in the United States each year to restore damaged/fractured bones by grafting. The number of patients in China with reduced limb function owing to bone abnormalities has risen to 10 million. Traditional bone defect repair materials include autogenous bone, allogeneic bone, xenogeneic bone, decalcified bone matrix, bioceramics, and metal materials, which are easily available and processed. Calcium silicate (Ca-Si) ceramic is among the most promising bioceramics for these purposes due to their amazing characteristics such as bioactivity, biocompatibility and osteoinductivity. Unfortunately, its high biodegradation rate along with its poor strength represents major limitations that limit its use in clinical applications significantly. In light of the above, this article briefly discussed the different types of bone substitute materials, the properties of Ca-Si ceramic, the advantages, limitations and potential solutions to overcome these drawbacks and its biomedical applications such as orthopedic, dental, wound healing and drug delivery.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Data Availability
The data and materials are available of this article.
References
Dimitriou R, Jones E, McGonagle D, Giannoudis P (2011) Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. BMC Med 91:66
Cacchioli A, Spaggiari B, Ravanetti F, Martini FM, Borghetti P, Gabbi C (2006) The critical bone defect: morphological study of bone healing, Annali della facolta di medicina veterinaria. Univ di Parma 26:97–110
Goulet J, Senunas L, DeSilva G, Greenfield M (1997) Autogenous iliac crest bone graft: complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 339:76–81
Seiler JG, Johnson J (2000) Iliac crest autogenous bone grafting: donor site complications. J South Orthop Assoc 92:91–97
Greenwald A, Boden S, Goldberg V, Khan Y, Laurencin C, Rosier R (2001) Bone-graft substitutes: facts, fictions, and applications. J Bone Jt Surg 83:98–103
Williams DF (1999) The Williams dictionary of biomaterials, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool. https://doi.org/10.5949/UPO9781846314438
Bandhyopadhya A, Bose S (2013) Characterization of biomaterials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–9
Barua E, Deoghare A, Deb P, Lala S (2018) Naturally derived biomaterials for development of composite bone scaffold: a review, IOP Conf. Ser Mater Sci Eng 377:012013
Ismail H, Mohamad H (2021) Bioactivity and biocompatibility properties of sustainable wollastonite bioceramics from rice husk ash/rice straw ash: a Review. Materials 14(18):5193
Lapidot S, Meirovitch S, Sharon S, Heyman A, Kaplan D, Shoseyov O (2012) Clues for biomimetics from natural composite materials. Nanomed J 7(9):1409–1423
Sarkar K, Xue Y, Sant S (2017) Host response to synthetic versus natural biomaterials. In: Corradetti B (ed) The immune response of implanted materials and devices. Springer, pp 81–105
Parida P, Behera A, Mishra SC (2012) Classification of biomaterials used in medicine. Int J Advances Appl Sci 1:31–35
Hench L, Splinter R, Allen W, Greenlee T (1971) Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res 5(6):117–141
Hench L, Polak J (2002) Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 295:1014–1017
Ribas R, Schatkoski V, Montanheiro T, de Menezes B, Stegemann C, Leite D et al (2019) Current advances in bone tissue engineering concerning ceramic and bioglass scaffolds: a review. Ceram Int 45(17):21051–21061
Ravaglioli A, Krawjesky R (1992) Bioceramics. Springer, Dordrecht. ISBN 978-94-010-5032-6
Du X, Fu S, Zhu Y (2018) 3D printing of ceramic-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: an overview. J Mater Chem B 6(27):4397–4412
Eliaz N, Metoki N (2017) Calcium phosphate bioceramics: a review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials 10(4):334
Bee S, Hamid Z (2019) Characterization of chicken bone waste-derived hydroxyapatite and its functionality on chitosan membrane for guided bone regeneration. Compos B Eng 163:562–573
Gao C, Feng P, Peng S, Shuai C (2017) Carbon nanotube, graphene and boron nitride nanotube reinforced bioactive ceramics for bone repair. Acta Biomater 61:1–20
Prakash J, Prema D, Venkataprasanna KS, Balagangadharan K, Selvamurugan N, Venkatasubbu GD (2020) Nanocomposite chitosan film containing graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite/gold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 154:62–71
Kang Z, Yu B, Fu S, Li D, Zhang X, Qian Z et al (2019) Three-dimensional printing of CaTiO3 incorporated porous β-Ca2SiO4 composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Appl Mater Today 16:132–140
Soundarya SP, Menon AH, Chandran SV, Selvamurugan N (2018) Bone tissue engineering: scaffold preparation using chitosan and other biomaterials with different design and fabrication techniques. Int J Biol Macromol 119:1228–1239
Volkov AV, Muraev AA, Zharkova II, Voinova VV, Akoulina EA, Zhuikov VA et al (2020) Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/hydroxyapatite/alginate scaffolds seeded with mesenchymal stem cells enhance the regeneration of critical-sized bone defect. Mater Sci Eng C 114:110991
Nikita E (2017) The human skeleton, Osteoarchaeol, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804021-8.00001-2
Boskey AL Osteoporosis and osteopetrosis, Handbook of Biomineralization, 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527619443.ch49
Boskey AL, Robey PG (2013) The composition of bone, primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism, pp 49–58
Saito M, Marumo K (2015) Effects of collagen crosslinking on bone material properties in health and disease, Calcif. Tissue Int 97:242–261
Varma S, Orgel JPRO, Schieber JD (2016) Nanomechanics of type I collagen. Biophys J 111:50–56
Garnero P (2015) The role of collagen organization on the properties of Bone, Calcif. Tissue Int 97:229–240
Sims NA, Gooi JH (2008) Bone remodelling: multiple cellular interactions required for coupling of bone formation and resorption, Semin. Cell Dev Biol 19:444–451
Matsuo K, Irie N (2008) Osteoclast-osteoblast communication. Arch Biochem Biophys 473(2):201–209
Florencio-Silva R, Sasso GR, Sasso-Cerri E, Simões MJ, Cerri PS (2015) Biology of bone tissue: structure, function, and factors that influence bone cells. Biomed Res Int 2015:1–17
Prideaux M, Bonewald LF, Dallas SL (2013) The osteocyte: an endocrine cell and more. Endocr Rev 34(5):658–690
Lea FM (2019) Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete, 5th edn. In: Hewlett PC, Liska M (eds). Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Toraya H, Yamazaki S (2002) Simulated annealing structure solution of a new phase of dicalcium silicate Ca2SiO4 and the mechanism of structural changes from α-dicalcium silicate hydrate to αl′-dicalcium silicate via the new phase. Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci 58:613–621
Mohammadi H, Hafezi M, Nezafati N, Heasarki S (2014) Bioinorganics in bioactive calcium silicate ceramics for bone tissue repair: bioactivity and biological properties. J Ceram Sci Technol 5:1–12
Golafshan N, Alehosseini M, Ahmadi T, Talebi A, Fathi M, Kharaziha M et al (2021) Combinatorial fluorapatite-based scaffolds substituted with strontium, magnesium and silicon ions for mending bone defects. Mater Sci Eng C 120:111611
Shie MY, Ding SJ (2013) Integrin binding and MAPK signal pathways in primary cell responses to surface chemistry of calcium silicate cements. Biomaterials 34:6589–6606
Shie MY, Chiang WH, Chen IWP, Liu WY, Chen YW (2017) Synergistic acceleration in the osteogenic and angiogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by calcium silicate–graphene composites. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 73:726–735
Su T-R, Huang T-H, Kao C-T, Ng HY, Chiu Y-C, Hsu T-T (2020) The calcium channel affect osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on strontium-substituted calcium silicate/poly-ε-Caprolactone scaffold. Processes 8:198
Emadi R, Labbaf S, Sadeghzade S (2016) Formation mechanism of nano-hardystonite powder prepared by mechanochemical synthesis. Adv Powder Technol 27:2238–2244
Ghorbani F, Li D, Ni S, Zhou Y, Yu B (2020) 3D printing of acellular scaffolds for bone defect regeneration: a review. Mater Today Commun 22:100979
Lin M-C, Chen C-C, Wu I-T, Ding S-J (2020) Enhanced antibacterial activity of calcium silicate-based hybrid cements for bone repair. Mater Sci Eng C 110:110727
Srinath P, Abdul Azeem P, Venugopal K, Reddy (2020) Review on calcium silicate-based bioceramics in bone tissue engineering. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 17:2450–2464
Taha MA, Youness RA, Zawrah MF (2020) Phase composition, sinterability and bioactivity of amorphous nano-CaO-SiO2-CuO powder synthesized by sol-gel technique. Ceram Int 46:24462–24471
AbuShanab WS, Moustafa EB, Taha MA, Youness RA (2020) Synthesis and structural properties characterization of titania/zirconia/calcium silicate nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Appl Phys A 126:787
Kamali M, Ghahremaninezhad A (2018) A study of calcium-silicate-hydrate/polymer nanocomposites fabricated using the layer-by-layer method. Materials 11:527
Hughes E, Yanni T, Jamshidi P, Grover LM (2014) Inorganic cements for biomedical application: calcium phosphate, calcium sulphate and calcium silicate. Adv Appl Ceram 114:65–76
Wu C, Chang J (2007) Degradation, bioactivity, and cytocompatibility of diopside, akermanite, and bredigite ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 83B:153–160
Nakajima S, Harada Y, Kurihara Y, Wakatsuki T, Noma H (1989) Physicochemical characteristics of new reinforcement ceramic implant. Shikwa Gakuho 89:1709–1717
Wu C, Ramaswamy Y, Zreiqat H (2010) Porous diopside (CaMgSi2O6) scaffold: a promising bioactive material for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 6:2237–2245
Wu C, Ramaswamy Y, Boughton P, Zreiqat H (2008) Improvement of mechanical and biological properties of porous CaSiO3 scaffolds by poly(D,L-lactic acid) modification. Acta Biomater 4:343–353
Wu C, Chang J, Zhai W, Ni S, Wang J (2006) Porous akermanite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: preparation, characterization, and in vitro studies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 78B:47–55
Zadehnajar P, Mirmusavi MH, Soleymani Eil S, Bakhtiari HR, Bakhsheshi-Rad S, Karbasi S, RamaKrishna et al (2021) Recent advances on Akermanite calcium‐silicate ceramic for biomedical applications. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 18:1901–1920
Tavangarian F, Zolko CA, Davami K (2021) Synthesis, characterization and formation mechanisms of nanocrystalline akermanite powder. J Mater Res Technol 11:792–800
Hou X, Yin G, Chen X, Liao X, Yao Y, Huang Z (2011) Effect of akermanite morphology on precipitation of bone-like apatite. Appl Surf Sci 257:3417–3422
Liu W, Wang T, Zhao X, Dan X, Lu WW, Pan H (2016) Akermanite used as an alkaline biodegradable implants for the treatment of osteoporotic bone defect. Bioact Mater 1:151–159
Jadidi A, Salahinejad E (2020) Mechanical strength and biocompatibility of bredigite (CA7MGSI4O16) tissue-engineering scaffolds modified by aliphatic polyester coatings. Ceram Int 46:16439–16446
Galla JH (2000) Metabolic alkalosis. JASN 11:369–375
Zhai W, Lu H, Wu C, Chen L, Lin X, Naoki K et al (2013) Stimulatory effects of the ionic products from Ca–Mg–Si bioceramics on both osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vitro. Acta Biomater 9:8004–8014
Koppala S, Souza RMD, Sivanandam P, Tammina SK, Xu L, Li K et al (2020) Sol gel combustion derived monticellite bioceramic powders for apatite formation ability evaluation. Mater Res Express 6:125431
Ou J, Kang Y, Huang Z, Chen X, Wu J, Xiao R et al (2008) Preparation and in vitro bioactivity of novel merwinite ceramic. Biomed Mater 3:015015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/3/1/015015
Hafezi M, Reza Talebi A, Mohsen Miresmaeili S, Sadeghian F, Fesahat F (2013) Histological analysis of bone repair in rat femur via nanostructured merwinite granules. Ceram Int 39:4575–4580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.054
Grice JD, Belley PM, Fayek M (2014) Serendibite, a complex borosilicate mineral from Pontiac, Quebec: Description, chemical composition, and crystallographic data. Can Mineral 52:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.52.1.1
Verding G, Pertsev NN, Schreyer W (1990) Synthesis and phase relations of serendibite. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 315:1454–1457
Di Giuseppe D, Perchiazzi N, Brunelli D, Giovanardi T, Nodari L, Della Ventura G et al (2021) Occurrence and characterization of tremolite asbestos from the Mid Atlantic Ridge. Sci Rep 11:6285. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85576-w
Dachs E, Metz P (1988) The mechanism of the reaction 1 tremolite + 3 calcite + 2 quartz = 5 diopside + 3 CO2 + 1 H2O: Results of powder experiments. Contrib Mineral Petrol 100:542–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00371382
Chang J, Zhai W, Wu C (2005) A novel hardystonite bioceramic: preparation and characteristics. Ceram Int 31(1):27–31
Romero-Sánchez LB, Borrego-González S, Díaz-Cuenca A (2017) High surface area biopolymeric-ceramic scaffolds for hard tissue engineering. Biomed Phys Eng Express 3:035012
Xiong K, Shi H, Liu J, Shen Z, Li H, Ye J (2013) Control of the dissolution of Ca and Si ions from CaSiO3 bioceramic via tailoring its surface structure and chemical composition. J Amer Ceram Soc 96:691–696
Zreiqat H, Ramaswamy Y, Wu C, Paschalidis A, Lu ZF, James B et al (2010) The incorporation of strontium and zinc into a calcium–silicon ceramic for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31:3175–3184
Youness RA, Ibrahim MA, Taha MA (2022) Evaluation of the electrical and dielectric behavior of the apatite layer formed on the surface of hydroxyapatite/hardystonite/copper oxide hybrid nanocomposites for bone repair applications. Ceram Int 48:19837–19850
Hamvar M, Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Omidi M, Ismail AF, Aziz M, Berto F et al (2020) Biocompatibility and bioactivity of hardystonite-based nanocomposite scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Biomed Phys Eng Express 6:035011
Jaiswal AK, Chhabra H, Kadam SS, Londhe K, Soni VP, Bellare JR (2013) Hardystonite improves biocompatibility and strength of electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers over hydroxyapatite: a comparative study. Mater Sci Eng C 33:2926–2936
Piconi C, Maccauro G (1999) Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 20:1–25
Kohorst P, Borchers L, Strempel J, Stiesch M, Hassel T, Bach F-W et al (2012) Low-temperature degradation of different zirconia ceramics for dental applications. Acta Biomater 8:1213–1220
Roohani-Esfahani SI, Dunstan CR, Davies B, Pearce S, Williams R, Zreiqat H (2012) Repairing a critical-sized bone defect with highly porous modified and unmodified baghdadite scaffolds. Acta Biomater 8:4162–4172
Arefpour A, Kasiri-Asgarani M, Monshi A, Karbasi S, Doostmohammadi A (2019) baghdadite/polycaprolactone nanocomposite scaffolds: Preparation, characterisation, and in vitro biological responses of human osteoblast-like cells (Saos-2 cell line). Mater Technol 35:421–432
Lu ZF, Wang GC, Roohani-Esfahani I, Dunstan CR, Zreiqat H (2014) Baghdadite ceramics modulate the cross talk between human adipose stem cells and osteoblasts for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng A 20:992–1002
Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T (1990) Solutions able to reproducein vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W3. J Biomed Mater Res 24:721–734
Youness RA, Amer MS, Taha MA (2022) Tribo-mechanical measurements and in vivo performance of zirconia-containing biphasic calcium phosphate material implanted in a rat model for bone replacement applications. Mater Chem Phys 285:126085
Abushanab WS, Moustafa EB, Youness RA (2022) Evaluation of the dynamic behavior, elastic properties, and in vitro bioactivity of some borophosphosilicate glasses for orthopedic applications. J Non Cryst Solids 586:12153
Alturki AM, Abuyazied DE, Taha MA, Abomostafa HM, Youness RA (2022) A study to evaluate the bioactivity behavior and electrical properties of hydroxyapatite/Ag2O-borosilicate glass nanocomposites for biomedical applications. J Inorg Organomet Polym 32:169–179
Youness RA, Taha MA, Ibrahim MA (2021) The influence of various zirconia contents on crystallite sizes, shrinkage, and physical and mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite-based nanobiocomposites. Egypt J Chem 64:1347–1352
Abulyazied DE, Alturki AM, Youness RA, Abomostafa HM (2021) Synthesis, structural and biomedical characterization of hydroxyapatite/borosilicate bioactive glass nanocomposites. J Inorg Organomet Polym 31:4077–4092
Alatawi AS, Alturki AM, Soliman GM, Abulyazied DE, Taha MA, Youness RA (2021) Improved toughness, electrical conductivity and optical properties of bioactive borosilicate glasses for orthopedic applications. Appl Phys A 127:971
Rhee SH, Lee YK, Lim BS (2005) Evaluation of a chitosan nano-hybrid material containing silanol group and calcium salt as a bioactive bone graft, Key Eng Mater 17:765–768
Bonfield W, Grynpas MD, Tully AE, Bowman J, Abram J (1981) Hydroxyapatite reinforced polyethylene—a mechanically compatible implant material for bone replacement. Biomaterials 2:185–186
Hench LL (2005) Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 81:1705–1728
Lee J-C, Cho SB, Lee SJ, Rhee S-H (2009) Nucleation and growth mechanism of apatite on a bioactive and degradable ceramic/polymer composite with a thick polymer layer. J Mater Sci 44:4531–4538
Rhee S-H, Choi J-Y, Kim H-M (2002) Preparation of a bioactive and degradable poly(ε-caprolactone)/silica hybrid through a sol–gel method. Biomaterials 23:4915–4921
Rhee SH (2003) Effect of molecular weight of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) on interpenetrating network structure, apatite-forming ability, and degradability of poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/silica nano-hybrid materials. Biomaterials 24(10):1721–1727
Rhee SH (2003) Effect of calcium salt content in the poly(epsilon caprolactone)/silica nanocomposite on the nucleation and growth behavior of apatite layer. J Biomed Mater Res A 67(4):1131–1138
Rhee SH (2004) Bone-like apatite-forming ability and mechanical properties of poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/silica hybrid as a function of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) content. Biomaterials 25:1167–1175
Yoo JJ, Rhee S-H (2004) Evaluations of bioactivity and mechanical properties of poly (epsilon-caprolactone)/silica nanocomposite following heat treatment. J Biomed Mater Res A 68:401–410
Rhee S-H, Choi J-Y (2004) Preparation of a bioactive poly(methyl methacrylate)/silica nanocomposite. J Am Ceram Soc 85:1318–1320
Rhee S-H, Hwang M-H, Si H-J, Choi J-Y (2003) Biological activities of osteoblasts on poly(methyl methacrylate)/silica hybrid containing calcium salt. Biomaterials 24:901–906
Tsuru K, Hayakawa S, Ohtsuki C, Osaka A (1997) Bioactivity and structure of organically modified silicate synthesized by the sol-gel method. Bioceramics 10:33–36
Chen Q, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (1999) Apatite Formation on PDMS-modified CaO–SiO2–TiO2 hybrids prepared by sol–gel process. Biomaterials 20:1127–1132
Chen Q, Miyata N, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (2000) Bioactivity and mechanical properties of PDMS-modified CaO-SiO2-TiO2 hybrids prepared by sol-gel process. J Biomed Mater Res 51:605–611
Miyata N, Chen Q, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (1999) Mechanical behavior of bioactive PDMS-modified CaO-SiO2-TiO2 hybrid materials: Effects of heat treatments and TiO2 content. Bioceramics 12:441–444
Miyata N, -ichi Fuke K, Chen Q, Kawashita M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (2002) Apatite-forming ability and mechanical properties of PTMO-modified CaO–SiO2 hybrids prepared by sol–gel processing: Effect of CaO and PTMO contents. Biomaterials 23:3033–3040
Kamitakahara M, Kawashita M, Miyata N, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (2003) Apatite-forming ability and mechanical properties of CaO-free poly(tetramethylene oxide) (PTMO)–TiO2 hybrids treated with hot water. Biomaterials 24:1357–1363
Miyata N, -ichi Fuke K, Chen Q, Kawashita M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (2004) Apatite-forming ability and mechanical properties of PTMO-modified CaO–SiO2–TiO2 hybrids derived from sol–gel processing. Biomaterials 25:1–7
Kim H-W, Lee H-H, Chun G-S (2008) Bioactivity and osteoblast responses of novel biomedical nanocomposites of bioactive glass nanofiber filled poly(lactic acid). J Biomed Mater Res A 85A:651–663
Chen LJ, Wang M (2002) Production and evaluation of biodegradable composites based on PHB–PHV copolymer. Biomaterials 23:2631–2639
Li H, Chang J (2005) In vitro degradation of porous degradable and bioactive PHBV/wollastonite composite scaffolds. Polym Degrad Stab 87:301–307
Shirazi FS, Moghaddam E, Mehrali M, Oshkour AA, Metselaar HS, Kadri NA et al (2014) In vitro characterization and mechanical properties of β-calcium silicate/POC composite as a bone fixation device. J Biomed Mater Res A 102:3973–3985
Cabal B, Alou L, Couceiro R, Cafni F, Couceiro R, Tejeda LE, Guitian F, Torrecillas R, Maya JS (2014) A new biocompatible and antibacterial free glass-ceramic for medical applications. Sci Rep 5440(4):1–9
Yadav S, Shreyasi majumdar A, Ali S, Krishnamurthy P, Singh R, Pyare (2021) In-vitro analysis of bioactivity, hemolysis, and mechanical properties of Zn substituted calcium zirconium silicate (baghdadite). Ceram Int 47:16037–16053
Aydin Sevinç B, Hanley L (2010) Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 94(1):22–31
Srinath P, Abdul Azeem P, Venugopal KR (2019) In vitro evaluation of silver doped wollastonite synthesized from natural waste for biomedical applications. Ceram Int 45:25044–25051
Yasuyuki M, Kunihiro K, Kurissery S, Kanavillil N, Sato Y, Kikuchi Y (2010) Antibacterial properties of nine pure metals: a laboratory study using Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Biofouling 26:851–858
Santo CE, Lam EW, Elowsky CG, Quaranta D, Domaille DW, Chang CJ, Grass G (2011) Bacterial killing by dry metallic copper surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:794–802
Azeena S, Subhapradha N, Selvamurugan N, Narayan S, Srinivasan N, Murugesan R et al (2017) Antibacterial activity of agricultural waste derived wollastonite doped with copper for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 71:1156–1165
Srinath P, Abdul Azeem P, Reddy KV (2020) Review on calcium silicate-based bioceramics in bone tissue engineering. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 17:2450–2464
Siriphannon P, Kameshima Y, Yasumori A, Okada K, Hayashi S (2000) Influence of preparation conditions on the microstructure and bioactivity of α-CaSiO3 ceramics: formation of hydroxyapatite in simulated body fluid. J Biomed Mater Res 52:30–39
De Aza PN, Luklinska ZB, Martinez A, Anseau MR, Guitian F (2000) De Aza, Morphological and structural study of pseudowollastonite implants in bone. J Microsc 197:60–67
Xue W, Liu X, Zheng XB, Ding C (2005) In vivo evaluation of plasma-sprayed wollastonite coating. Biomaterials 26:3455–3460
Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, Chang J, Wang L, Lu J et al (2008) Reconstruction of calvarial defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 29:2588–2596
Venkatraman SK, Swamiappan S (2020) Review on calcium- and magnesium‐based silicates for bone tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 108:1546–1562
Diba M, Goudouri O-M, Tapia F, Boccaccini AR (2014) Magnesium-containing bioactive polycrystalline silicate-based ceramics and glass-ceramics for biomedical applications. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 18:147–167
Wang S, Huang G, Dong Y (2020) Directional migration and odontogenic differentiation of bone marrow stem cells induced by dentin coated with nanobioactive glass. J Endod 46(2):216–223
Lee AK, Lin YH, Huang TH, Ho CC, Shie MY, Tu MG (2020) Caffeic acid-coated nanolayer on mineral trioxide aggregate potentiates the host immune responses, angiogenesis, and odontogenesis. J Endod 46(10):1455–1464
Laino L, D’Amico C, Russo D, Nucci L, Amoroso G, Gorassini F, Tepedino M, Terranova A, Gambino D, Mastroieni R, Tözüm MD, Fiorillo L, Cervino G (2020) Mineral trioxide aggregate applications in endodontics: a review. Eur J Dent 14(4):683–691
Chen Y, Gao Y, Tao Y, Lin D, An S (2019) Identification of a calcium-sensing receptor in human dental pulp cells that regulates mineral trioxide aggregate–induced mineralization. J Endod 45:907–916
Kao C-T, Chen Y-J, Huang T-H, Lin Y-H, Hsu T-T, Ho C-C (2020) Assessment of the release profile of fibroblast growth factor-2-load mesoporous calcium silicate/poly-ε-caprolactone 3D scaffold for regulate bone regeneration. Processes 8:1249
Parirokh M, Torabinejad M (2010) Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—part III: clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod 36:400–413
Nair PN, Duncan HF, Pitt Ford TR, Luder HU (2008) Histological, Ultrastructural and quantitative investigations on the response of healthy human pulps to experimental capping with mineral trioxide aggregate: a randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J 41:128–150
Seo M-S, Hwang K-G, Lee J, Kim H, Baek S-H (2013) The effect of mineral trioxide aggregate on odontogenic differentiation in dental pulp stem cells. J Endod 39:242–248
Roberts HW, Toth JM, Berzins DW, Charlton DG (2008) Mineral trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 24(2):149–164
Gaudin A, Tolar M, Peters OA (2020) Cytokine production and cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-based sealers in 2- and 3-dimensional cell culture models. J Endod 46(6):818–826
Rathinam E, Govindarajan S, Rajasekharan S, Declercq H, Elewaut D, De Coster P et al (2021) The calcium dynamics of human dental pulp stem cells stimulated with tricalcium silicate-based cements determine their differentiation and mineralization outcome. Sci Rep 11:645
Lansdown ABG, Mirastschijski U, Stubbs N et al (2007) Zinc in wound healing: theoretical, experimental, and clinical aspects. Wound Repair Regen 15(1):2–16
Wu C, Chang J, Zhou Y (2019) Bioceramics to regulate stem cells and their microenvironment for tissue regeneration. Mater Today 24:41–56
Chang J, Wu C, Yu Q (2019) Silicate bioceramics: from soft tissue regeneration to tumor therapy. J Mater Chem 7:5449–5460
Yan X, Huang X, Yu C (2006) The in-vitro bioactivity of mesoporous bioactive glasses. Biomaterials 27:3396–3403
Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S, Xue W (2009) Mesoporous calcium silicate for controlled release of bovine serum albumin protein. Acta Biomater 5:1686–1696
Eltohamy M, Kundu B, Moon J, Lee H-Y (2018) Anti-bacterial zinc-doped calcium silicate cements: bone filler. Ceram Int 44:13031–13038
Lin Q, Lan X, Li Y et al (2011) Preparation and in vitro bioactivity of zinc incorporating tricalium silicate. Mater Sci Eng C 31:629–636
Gottschalck TE, McEwen GN, Cosmetic Toiletry and Fragrance Association (2005) International cosmetic ingredient dictionary and handbook, 11th edn. Cosmetic Toiletry and Fragrance Association
(2003) Final report on the safety assessment of aluminum silicate, calcium silicate, magnesium aluminum silicate, magnesium silicate, magnesium trisilicate, sodium magnesium silicate, zirconium silicate, attapulgite, bentonite, Fuller’s Earth, hectorite, kaolin, lithium magnesium silicate, lithium magnesium sodium silicate, montmorillonite, pyrophyllite, and zeolite. Int J Toxicol 22:37–102
Reddy PM, Lakshmi R, Dass FP, Sasikumar S (2016) Synthesis, characterization and formulation of sodium calcium silicate bioceramic for drug delivery applications. Sci Eng Compos 23:375–380
Zhu Y-J, Guo X-X, Sham T-K (2016) Calcium silicate-based drug delivery systems, Expert Opin. Drug Deliv 14:215–228
Funding
Funding Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The manuscript was written by the contributions of all authors. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. Rasha A. Youness- Presenting the idea of research and contributing to writing and reviewing the manuscript. Doha M. Tag El-deen- Collecting scientific materials and contributing to writing the manuscript. Mohammed A. Taha- Contributing to writing and reviewing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Consent to Participate
Consent for Publication
The authors agree to publish this article in its current form.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Youness, R.A., Tag El-deen, D.M. & Taha, M.A. A Review on Calcium Silicate Ceramics: Properties, Limitations, and Solutions for Their Use in Biomedical Applications. Silicon 15, 2493–2505 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02207-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02207-3