Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Life Cycle Assessment of Crystalline Silicon Wafers for Photovoltaic Power Generation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A life cycle assessment(LCA) was conducted over the modified Siemens method polycrystalline silicon(S-P-Si) wafer, the modified Siemens method single crystal silicon(S-S-Si) wafer, the metallurgical route polycrystalline silicon(M-P-Si) wafer and the metallurgical route single crystal silicon(M-S-Si) wafer from quartzite mining to wafer slicing in China. A large amount of data was investigated from relevant literature and factories in this study. Based on the contribution analysis and sensitivity analysis, the key points for improvement were found. The result included primary energy demand (PED), chemical oxygen demand (COD), SO2, NH3-N, NOX, CO2, and industrial water use (IWU). The above seven indexes were weighted and then added to get China’s thirteenth five-year plan for energy conservation and emission reduction total environmental impact indexes(ECER-135) of S-P-Si wafer, S-S-Si wafer, M-P-Si wafer and M-S-Si wafer were 1.47 × 10−9, 2.12 × 10−9, 3.30 × 10−10 and 1.22 × 10−9 respectively. The ECER-135 of silicon wafers purified with modified Siemens method was higher than that purified with metallurgical route by 3.1 times on average; the ECER-135 of single crystal silicon wafers production was larger than that of polysilicon wafers production by 2.3 times on average. When the four kinds of silicon wafers were used to generate the same amount of electricity for photovoltaic modules, the ECER-135 of S-P-Si wafer, S-S-Si wafer and M-S-Si wafer were 3.3, 4.5 and 2.8 times of that of M-P-Si wafer respectively. During the whole production process, the electricity consumption was of the highest sensitivity for ECER-135. PED had the highest contribution to the ECER-135 for four kinds of silicon wafers, mainly due to the use of thermal power. If hydropower were used instead of thermal power, the ECER-135 could be reduced by 46% to 62%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Polaris power network news center (2019) China energy big data report (2019), China, Available from: http://news.bjx.com.cn/html/20190516/980721-3.shtml

  2. Qi LQ, Zhang YJ (2017) Effects of solar photovoltaic technology on the environment in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:22133–22142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ray P (2019) Renewable energy and sustainability. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21:1517–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gustav R, Anne H, Thomas F, Christian P, Felipe T, Reinhard H (2008) Potentials and prospects for renewable energies at global scale. Energy Policy 36:4048–4056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu JQ, Wang K, Wu HW (2015) Experimental investigation on the energy and exergy performance of a coiled tube solar receive. Appl Energy 156:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao RR, Shi G, Chen HY, Ren AF, Finlow D (2011) Present status and prospects of photovoltaic market in China. Energy Policy 39:2204–2207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grau T, Huo M, Neuhoff K (2012) Survey of photovoltaic industry and policy in Germany and China. Energy Policy 51:20–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang S, Philip A, Zhao XL, He YX (2013) Interactions between renewable energy policy and renewable energy industrial policy: a critical analysis of china's policy approach to renewable energies. Energy Policy 62:342–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang SF, Philip A, Ji MY (2014) The erratic path of the low-carbon transition in China: evolution of solar PV policy. Energy Policy 67:903–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu L, Xu Y, Pan Y J (2019) Enabled comparative advantage strategy in China's solar PV development Energy Policy 133:

  11. Alexander HS, Daniel SC, Jacopo B, Charles F, Thomas M, Jean-Christophe N, Costas NP, Amin G, Corey JN, Stefano P, Folkers R, Alexander M (2011) Concentrated solar power on demand. Sol Energy 85:1519–1529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Irene R, Emilio M, Rafael E, Gustavo N, Juan DLC (2019) Analysis of the performance of various PV module Technologies in Peru. Energies 12:186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alaaeddin MH, Sapuan SM, Zuhri MYM, Zainudin ES, Oqla FMAL (2019) Photovoltaic applications: status and manufacturing prospects. Renew Sust Energ Rev 102:318–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yue DJ, You FQ, Seth BD (2014) Domestic and overseas manufacturing scenarios of silicon-based photovoltaics: life cycle energy and environmental comparative analysis. Sol Energy 105:669–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen W, Hong JG, Yuan XL, Liu JR (2016) Environmental impact assessment of monocrystalline silicon solar photovoltaic cell production: a case study in China. J Clean Prod 112:1025–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Crago CL, Koegler E (2018) Drivers of growth in commercial-scale solar PV capacity. Energy Policy 120:481–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. NEA (2015) 2014 photovoltaic power generation statistics. China, Available from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2015-03/09/c_134049519.htm

  18. NEA (2016) Relevant statistics of photovoltaic power generation in 2015. China, Available from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2016-02/05/c_135076636.htm

  19. NEA (2017) Statistics of photovoltaic power generation in 2016. China, Available from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2017-02/04/c_136030860.htm

  20. NEA (2018) National energy administration press conference introduces relevant energy situation in 2017. China, Available from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2018-01/24/c_136921015.htm

  21. NEA (2019) Statistics of photovoltaic power generation in 2018. China. Available from: http://www.nea.gov.cn/2019-03/19/c_137907428.htm

  22. Shuai J, Chen C, Cheng JH, Leng ZH, Wang ZH (2018) Are China's solar PV products competitive in the context of the belt and road initiative? Energy Policy 120:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jacques DA, Guan D, Geng Y, Xue B, Wang XG (2013) Inter-provincial clean development mechanism in China: a case study of the solar PV sector. Energy Policy 57:454–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Luis H, Sara G, Víctor A (2019) A review of photovoltaic systems: design, operation and maintenance. Sol Energy 188:426–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kouji Y, Toru H. Okabe (2010) Solar-grade silicon production by metallothermic reduction. J Miner Met Mater Soc 62: 94–101

  26. Zhang X (2015) Progress of polysilicon production technology by improved Siemens method. Chin Sci Technol Expo 41:326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hou Y Q, Fang W B, Zhou Y M, Tian L, Du P, Wang C L, Yu C, L Y, Xie G (2018) Research progress of heat transfer in Siemens reduction furnace . J Kunming Univ Technol (NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION) 43: 1–8

  28. Luo DW, Zhang GL, Zhang J, Li J, Li TJ (2008) Principle and research progress of solar grade silicon prepared by metallurgical method. Foundry Technol 12:1721–1726

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shi J (2011) Technological progress and Prospect of solar grade polysilicon industry by metallurgical process. New Mater Indust 3:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  30. He YQ (2009) Production of solar grade polysilicon by metallurgical method. Fine Spec Chem 2:19–21

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marina ML, Alvarez-Gaitan JP, Nathan IC, Richard C (2018) Life cycle assessment on PERC solar modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 187:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brandon K, Antonino M, Miguel FA, Wesley WI, Satterfield MB, David PE, Christophy K, Tomás N, Ben A, Lise L (2018) LCA capability roadmap—product system model description and revision. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1685–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ye H L (2008) Life cycle assessment of industrial silicon production process. Kunming University of technology

  34. Ban H, Zou ZY, Zhang WF (2005) Energy consumption and energy saving analysis of industrial silicon production. Light Metal 48:42–43

    Google Scholar 

  35. He Y (2013) Life cycle assessment of solar grade polysilicon. Southwest Jiaotong University

  36. Xie MH, Ruan JL, Bai L, Qiao Q, Liu XQ, Yang DR, Yang LF (2015) Life cycle environmental impact assessment of solar grade polysilicon. Environ Sci Res 2:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  37. M.J. de Wild-Scholten, R. Gløckner, J.-O. Odden, G. Halvorsen, R. Tronstad (2008) LCA COMPARISON OF THE ELKEM SOLAR METALLURGICAL ROUTE AND CONVENTIONAL GAS ROUTES TO SOLAR SILICON. European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference 23rd

  38. Yu ZQ, Ma WH, Zheng DM, Wei KX, Xi FS (2016) Life cycle assessment of solar grade polysilicon prepared by metallurgical method. J Kunming Univ sci Technol (NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION) 41:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ma L, Yu ZQ, Ma WH, Qing S, Wu JJ (2019) Assessment and study on the impact on environment by multi-crystalline silicon preparation by metallurgical route. Silicon 11:1383–1391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Yuan Y, Yuan C, Eric M (2014) A hybrid life-cycle inventory for multi-crystalline silicon PV module manufacturing in China. Environ Res Lett 9

  41. Xu L, Zhang SF, Yang MS, Li WL, Xu J (2018) Environmental effects of China's solar photovoltaic industry during 2011–2016: a life cycle assessment approach. J Clean Prod 170:310–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Letitia P, Davide B, Gianluca V, Ana-Maria C, Calin-Cristian C (2017) Life cycle assessment for supercritical pulverized coal power plants with post-combustion carbon capture and storage. J Clean Prod 157:10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Huang BJ, Zhao J, Chai JY, Xue B, Zhao F, Wang XY (2017) Environmental influence assessment of China’s multi-crystalline silicon (multi-Si) photovoltaic modules considering recycling process. Sol Energy 143:132–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Diao ZW, Shi L (2011) Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic cell modules in China. Environ Sci Res 5:571–579

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nakajima Y (2018) Silicon crystal growth of solar cell. University, Shanghai Jiaotong

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang W, Zhao L, Wang C (2012) The current situation of polysilicon production by changing Siemens method and metallurgical method in China. Guang zhou Chem Ind 40:21–22

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hou GF, Sun HH, Jiang ZY, Pan ZQ, Wang YB, Zhang XD, Zhao Y, Yao Q (2016) Life cycle assessment of grid-connected photovoltaic power generation from crystalline silicon solar modules in China. Appl Energy 164:882–890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ministry of industry and information technology of the people's Republic of China (2018) Specifications and conditions for photovoltaic manufacturing industry (2018 version)

  49. Fu YY (2013) Life cycle assessment of polysilicon photovoltaic system in China. Nanjing University

  50. Yu Z Q (2017) Life cycle assessment of metallurgical polysilicon and its photovoltaic system. Kunming University of science and technology

  51. Nian YB, Chen XS, He SF (2011) Research progress in the principle and production process of solar grade polysilicon prepared by metallurgy. Mineral resources. 3: 8-13

  52. Li J (2017) Tribochemical wear of silicon materials with different crystal structures. Southwest Jiaotong University

  53. Shimizu T, Fujikawa T, Tonsho M, Inagaki M (2001) Effect of batch feeding of limestone on NOx and SO2 emissions during petroleum coke combustion in a bubbling fluidized bed combustor. Energy Fuel 15:1220–1224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Eduardo F, Bruno C, Laura M, Alejandro S, Antonio PV, Timur V, Joaquin D (2019) Mass production test of solar cells and modules made of 100% umg silicon. 20.76% record efficiency. Energies 12:1–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support of Kunming University of Science and Technology talent introduction research start-up fund project in 2018 (provincial) (KKSY201852006) and National college students innovation and entrepreneurship training program in 2019 (201910674002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiqiang Yu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, M., Yu, Z., Ma, W. et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Crystalline Silicon Wafers for Photovoltaic Power Generation. Silicon 13, 3177–3189 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00670-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00670-4

Keywords

Navigation