Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of Material Removal Rate and Tool Wear Rate in Spark Erosion Machining of Al-Fe-Si Alloy Composite Using Taguchi Coupled TOPSIS Approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An Electrical discharge machining (EDM) process is most essential in the machining of hard and complex geometrical material which is difficult to machine by conventional machining technique. The EDM process parameters namely electrode material, pulse current, pulse-on time and pulse-off time are significantly influence the machining performance characteristics, such as material removal rate (MRR) and tool wear rate (TWR). Hence, in the present study, the influence of EDM parameters on the MRR and TWR are examined during machining of Al-Fe-Si alloy (AA8011) filled with 15 wt.% ZrO2 composite fabricated through stir casting route. The experimental work was performed according to the L27 (34) orthogonal array using Taguchi design of experiments (DOE). A Taguchi method and Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS) has been used to investigate the multiple performance characteristics with an objective to maximize the MRR and minimize the TWR. Moreover, analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been employed to bring out the influence of the EDM parameters associated with each performance characteristics. Main effect plot shows that, the maximum MRR with minimum TWR are obtained by the optimum level of parameters are electrode material of EN-8, pulse current at 15amps, pulse-on time at 900 μs and pulse-off time at 60 μs. From ANOVA analysis, electrode material and pulse current are the most influencing parameters on the MRR and TWR. Finally, the confirmation experiment was conducted to verify the prediction of the results attained by the optimum EDM parameters combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalaiselvan K, Murugan N, Parameswaran S (2011) Production and characterization of AA6061–B4C stir cast composite. Mater Des 32:4004–4009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alagarsamy SV, Ravichandran M (2019) Synthesis, microstructure and properties of TiO2 reinforced AA7075 matrix composites via stir casting route. Mater Res Express 6:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saravanan S, Senthilkumar P, Ravichandran M (2017) Mechanical, electrical and corrosion behavior of AA6063/TiC composites synthesized via stir casting route. J Mater Res 32:606–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho KH, Newman ST (2003) State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:1287–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Selvarajan L, SathiyaNarayanan C, Jeyapaul R (2015) Optimization of EDM hole drilling parameters in machining of MoSi2-SiC intermetallic/composites for improving geometrical tolerances. J Adv Manuf Syst 14:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar H, Paulo Davim J (2011) Role of powder in the machining of Al-10%SiCp metal matrix composites by powder mixed electric discharge machining. J Comps Mater 45:133–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Senthilkumar V, Omprakash BU (2011) Effect of titanium carbide particle addition in the aluminium composite on EDM process parameters. J Manuf Process 13:60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin Y-C, Cheng C-H, Bo-Lin S (2006) Machining characteristics and optimization of machining parameters of SKH 57 high-speed steel using electrical-discharge machining based on Taguchi method. Mater Manuf Process 21:922–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nadda R, Gangil B, Kumar R, Singh T, Chauhan R, Patnaik A, Gangil B (2018) Experimental investigation and optimization of cobalt bonded tungsten carbide composite by hybrid AHP-TOPSIS approach. Alex Eng J 57:3419–3428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamiloli N, Venkatesan J, Murali G, Kodali SP, Sampath Kumar T (2019) Optimization of end milling on Al-SiC-fly ash metal matrix composite using TOPSIS and fuzzy logic. SN Appl Sci 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1191-z

  11. Gopalakannan S, Senthilvelan T (2013) Application of response surface method on machining of Al–SiC nano-composites. Measurement 46:2705–2715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhanabalan S, Sivakumar K, Sathiya Narayanan C (2015) Experimental investigation on electrical discharge machining of titanium alloy using copper, brass and aluminium electrodes. J Eng Sci Technol 10:72–80

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh B, Kumar J, Kumar S (2015) Optimization and surface modification in electrical discharge machining of AA 6061/SiC composite using cu–W electrode. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Material: Design and Applications 231:332–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420715596544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shyha I, Rudd M (2016) Electro-discharge machining of metal matrix composite materials. Adv Mater Proc Technol 2:235–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068x.2016.1164525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan AA (2008) Electrode wear and material removal rate during EDM of aluminium and mild steel copper and brass electrode. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:482–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar S, Dhingra AK, Kumar S (2017) Parametric optimization of powder mixed electrical discharge machining for nickel based super alloy inconel-800 using response surface methodology. Mech Adv Mater Moder Proc 3:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pradeep Kumar G, Thanigaivelan R, Arunachalam RM, Paramasivam P (2014) Experimental investigation of EDM processing parameters on machining Al6063-12% SiC-5% gr using response surface methodology. High Temp Mater Processes 18:27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar P, Parkash R (2016) Experimental investigation and optimization of EDM process parameters for machining of aluminum boron carbide (Al–B4C) composite. Mach Sci Technol 20:330–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh B, Kumar J, Kumar S (2014) Experimental investigation on surface characteristics in powder-mixed electro discharge machining of AA6061/10%SiC composite. Mater Manuf Process 9:287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Senthil P, Vinodh S, Singh AK (2014) Parametric optimisation of EDM on Al-cu/TiB2 in-situ metal matrix composites using TOPSIS method. Int J Machining Machinability Mater 16:80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fayomi J, Popoola API, Oladijo OP, Popoola OM, Fayomi OSI (2019) Experimental study of ZrB2-Si3N4 on the microstructure, mechanical and electrical properties of high grade AA8011 metal matrix composites. J Alloys Compd 790:610–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dey A, Debnath S, Pandey KM (2017) Optimization of electrical discharge machining process parameters for Al6061/cenosphere composite using grey-based hybrid approach. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 27:998–1010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mathan Kumar N, Senthil Kumaran S, Kumaraswamidhas LA (2015) An investigation of mechanical properties and material removal rate, tool wear rate in EDM machining process of AL2618 reinforced with Si3N4, AIN and ZrB2 composites. J. Alloys Compd 650:318–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alagarsamy SV, Ravichandran M (2019) Investigations on tribological behaviour of AA7075-TiO2 composites under dry sliding conditions. Ind Lubr Tribol 71:1064–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dinesh Kumar S, Ravichandran M (2018) Synthesis, characterization and wire electric erosion behaviour of AA7178-10wt.% ZrB2 composite. Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9802-7

  26. Marichamy S, Saravanan M, Ravichandran M, Veerappan G (2016) Parametric optimization of EDM process on α–β brass using Taguchi approach. Russ J Non Ferr Met 57:586–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Balasubramaniyan S, Selvaraj T (2017) Application of integrated Taguchi and TOPSIS method for optimization of process parameters for dimensional accuracy in turning of EN25 steel. J Chin Inst Eng 40:267–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2017.1308233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rengasamy NV, Rajkumar M, Senthil Kumaran S (2016) An analysis of mechanical properties and optimization of EDM process parameters of Al 4032 alloy reinforced with ZrB2 and TiB2 in-situ composites. J Alloys Compd 662:325–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Narender Singh P, Raghukandanand K, Pai BC (2004) Optimization by grey relational analysis of EDM parameters on machining al 10%SiC composites. J Mater Process Technol 155:1658–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gopalakannam S, Senthilvelan T, Ranganathan S (2013) Statistical optimization of EDM parameters on machining of aluminium hybrid metal matrix composites by applying Taguchi based Grey analysis. J Sci Ind Res 72:358–365

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Alagarsamy.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alagarsamy, S.V., Raveendran, P. & Ravichandran, M. Investigation of Material Removal Rate and Tool Wear Rate in Spark Erosion Machining of Al-Fe-Si Alloy Composite Using Taguchi Coupled TOPSIS Approach. Silicon 13, 2529–2543 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00596-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00596-x

Keywords

Navigation