pp 1–15 | Cite as

Parameter Optimization of Rotary Ultrasonic Machining on Quartz Glass Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

  • Dinesh SindhuEmail author
  • Lalit Thakur
  • Pankaj Chandna
Original Paper


In the current research, rotary ultrasonic machining was used to drill holes in quartz material. The effect of different RUM parameters namely tool feed rate, tool rotational speed and ultrasonic power on material removal rate and surface roughness has been studied experimentally. The response surface methodology with central composite design has been used to design the experiments. From the desirability approach, the optimum setting of the rotary ultrasonic machining parameters was found to be the tool rotational speed of 4968 rpm, feed rate of 0.55 mm/min, and ultrasonic power of 80% for achieving the maximum MRR of 0.2135 mm3/s and minimum SR of 0.3685 μm. Microstructure analysis of the machined surface was performed by using scanning electron microscopy in order to study the mechanisms of material removal under the different settings of RUM parameters. It was observed that at very low feed (0.08 mm/min) and high rpm (5681) the material is predominantly removed by plastic deformation whereas at high feed (0.92 mm/min) and low rpm (2318) the material is removed by brittle fracture.


Rotary ultrasonic machining Response surface methodology Scanning electron microscopy Surface roughness MRR Quartz glass 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The author would like to thank Director, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, Uttarakhand (India) for providing the SEM facility for microstructure analysis.


  1. 1.
    Rattan N, Mulik RS (2018) Experimental set up to improve machining performance of silicon dioxide ( quartz ) in magnetic field assisted TW-ECSM process. Silicon:1–9.
  2. 2.
    Ji L, Hu Y, Li J, Wang W, Jiang Y (2015) High-precision micro-through-hole array in quartz glass machined by infrared picosecond laser. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 121:1151–1157. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuo KY, Wu KL, Yang CK, Yan BH (2015) Effect of adding SiC powder on surface quality of quartz glass microslit machined by WECDM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:73–83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dubey AK, Yadava V (2008) Laser beam machining — a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(48):609–628. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jain VK, Adhikary S (2008) On the mechanism of material removal in electrochemical spark machining of quartz under different polarity conditions. J Mater Process Technol 200:460–470. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain VK, Chak SK (2000) Electrochemical spark trepanning of alumina and quartz. Mach Sci Technol 4:277–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuo KY, Wu KL, Yang CK, Yan BH (2013) Wire electrochemical discharge machining (WECDM) of quartz glass with titrated electrolyte flow. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 72:50–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guzzo PL, Raslan AA, De Mello JDB (2003) Ultrasonic abrasion of quartz crystals. Wear 255:67–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Antil P, Singh S, Manna A (2018) Electrochemical discharge drilling of SiC reinforced polymer matrix composite using Taguchi’s Grey relational analysis. Arab J Sci Eng 43:1257–1266. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rattan N, Mulik RS (2017) Experimental investigations and multi-response optimization of silicon dioxide (quartz) machining in magnetic field assisted TW-ECSM process. Silicon 9:663–673. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang J, Feng P, Zhang J (2016) Improving hole exit quality in rotary ultrasonic machining of ceramic matrix composites using a compound step-taper drill.
  12. 12.
    Zeng WM, Li ZC, Pei ZJ, Treadwell C (2005) Experimental observation of tool wear in rotary ultrasonic machining of advanced ceramics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1468–1473. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pei ZJ, Ferreira PM, Kapoor SG, Haselkorn M (1995) Rotary ultrasonic machining for face milling of ceramics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35:1033–1046. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar V, Singh H (2018) Rotary ultrasonic Drilling of Silica Glass BK-7: microstructural investigation and process optimization through TOPSIS. Silicon 1(15):471–485. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar J (2013) Ultrasonic machining-a comprehensive review, Ultrasonic Machining—A Comprehensive ReviewGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pei ZJ, Prabhakar D, Ferreira PM (1995) A mechanistic approach to the prediction of material removal rates in rotary ultrasonic machining. Trans ASME 117:142–151Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z.J. Pei, P.M. Ferreira MH (1995) Plastic flow in rotary ultrasonic machining of ceramics. J Mater Process Technol 48:771–777Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ya G, Qin HW, Yang SC, Xu YW (2002) Analysis of the rotary ultrasonic machining mechanism. J Mater Process Technol 129:182–185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pei ZJ, Ferreira PM (1998) Modeling of ductile-mode material removal in rotary ultrasonic machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38:1399–1418. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu P, Zhang JM, Pei ZJ, Treadwell C l (2002) Modeling of material removal rate in rotary ultrasonic machining: designed experiments. J Mater Process Technol 129:339–344. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li ZC, Jiao Y, Deines TW, Pei ZJ, Treadwell C (2005) Rotary ultrasonic machining of ceramic matrix composites: feasibility study and designed experiments. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1402–1411. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feng P, Wang J, Zhang J, Zheng J (2017) Drilling induced tearing defects in rotary ultrasonic machining of C/SiC composites. Ceram Int 43:791–799. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Churi NJ, Pei ZJ, Treadwell C (2007) Rotary ultrasonic machining of titanium alloy ( Ti-6Al-4V ): effects of tool variables. 1:Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gong H, Fang FZ, Hu XT (2010) Kinematic view of tool life in rotary ultrasonic side milling of hard and brittle materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:303–307. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu Jiaqing, Cong Weilong, Williams Robert PZP (2011) Dynamic Process Modeling for Rotary Ultrasonic Machining of Alumina. 133:.
  26. 26.
    Zhang C, Feng P, Pei Z, Cong W (2014) Rotary ultrasonic machining of sapphire : feasibility study and designed experiments 590:523–528.
  27. 27.
    Cong WL, Pei ZJ, Deines TW, Liu DF, Treadwell C (2013) Rotary ultrasonic machining of CFRP / Ti stacks using variable feedrate. Compos Part B 52:303–310. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang CL, Feng PF, Wu ZJ, Yu DW (2011) An experimental study on processing performance of rotary ultrasonic drilling of K9 glass. Adv Mater Res 230–232:221–225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Feng Q, Cong WL, Pei ZJ, CZR (2012) Rotary ultrasonic machining of carbon Fiber-reinforced polymer : feasibility study. Mach Sci Technol 16(3):380–398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thirumalai Kumaran S, Ko TJ, Li C, Yu Z, Uthayakumar M (2017) Rotary ultrasonic machining of woven CFRP composite in a cryogenic environment. J Alloys Compd 698:984–993. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang J, Zha H, Feng P, Zhang J (2016) On the mechanism of edge chipping reduction in rotary ultrasonic. Precis Eng 8(12):231–235. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang J, Wang J, Feng P, Zhang J (2016) Reduction of edge chipping in rotary ultrasonic machining by using step drill : a feasibility study.
  33. 33.
    Sindhu D, Thakur L, Chandna P (2018) Multi-objective optimization of rotary ultrasonic machining parameters for quartz glass using Taguchi-Grey relational analysis (GRA). Silicon.
  34. 34.
    Wang J, Feng P, Zhang J, Cai W, Shen H (2016) Investigations on the critical feed rate guaranteeing the effectiveness of rotary ultrasonic machining. Ultrasonics. 74:81–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cong WL, Pei ZJ, Treadwell C (2015) Vibration Amplitude in Rotary Ultrasonic Machining : A Novel Measurement Method and Effects of Process Variables 133:1–5.
  36. 36.
    Komaraiah M, Narasimha Reddy P (1991) Rotary ultrasonic machining— a new cutting process and its performance. Int J Prod Res 29:2177–2187. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu J, Zhang D, Qin L, Yan L (2012) Feasibility study of the rotary ultrasonic elliptical machining of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 53:141–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cong WL, Pei ZJ, Treadwell C (2014) Preliminary study on rotary ultrasonic machining of CFRP / Ti stacks. Ultrasonics 54:1594–1602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Singh RP, Singhal S (2016) Experimental study on rotary ultrasonic machining of alumina ceramic : microstructure analysis and multi-response optimization. J Mater Des Apllications 0:1–20. Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pei ZJ, Ferreira PM (1999) An experimental investigation of rotary ultrasonic face milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:1327–1344. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Singh RP, Singhal S (2017) Rotary ultrasonic machining of macor ceramic: an experimental investigation and microstructure analysis. Mater Manuf Process 32:927–939. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bifano TG, Dow T a, Scattergood RO (1991) Ductile-Regime Grinding: A New Technology for Machining Brittle Materials. J Eng Ind:113–184.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentN.I.T. KurukshetraHaryanaIndia

Personalised recommendations