pp 1–8 | Cite as

Investigations on Characterization and Properties of Al-MoO3 Composites Synthesized Using Powder Metallurgy Technique

  • B. Stalin
  • G. T. Sudha
  • M. Ravichandran
Original Paper


In this work, Powder Metallurgy (PM) technique was used to synthesize Aluminium based metal matrix composites with various weight percentages (0, 5, 10 & 15) of Molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) as reinforcement. The green cylindrical compacts were produced using a hydraulic press, sintered at 600 C for a period of 3 hours, furnace cooled and machined to obtain samples with aspect ratio of 0.5. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis was conducted to study the morphology of the sintered composites. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis was used to study the presence of MoO3 in Aluminium matrix. The cold upset tests were carried out in steps of 10 KN to study the strain hardening index and strength coefficient of the composites. The effect of MoO3 addition on the density, hardness, thermal conductivity and strength coefficient were analyzed and the results show that the increase in weight percentage of MoO3 content in the Al matrix increases the strength coefficient and hardness of the composite and decreases the strain hardening index and thermal conductivity.


Aluminium matrix composites Cold upsetting Powder metallurgy MoO3 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors thank the Department of Manufacturing Engineering, CEG Campus, Anna University, Chennai and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Anna University, Regional Campus Madurai for providing partial support for carrying out this research work.


  1. 1.
    Muratoğlu M, Aksoy M (2000) The effects of temperature on wear behaviours of Al–Cu alloy and Al–Cu:SiC composite. Mater Sci Eng A 282:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Slipenyuk A, Kuprin V, Yu M, Spowart JE, Miracle DB (2004) The effect of matrix to reinforcement particle size ratio (PSR) on the microstructure and mechanical properties of a P/M processed AlCuMn/SiCp MMC. Mater Sci Eng A 381:165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shao JC, Xiao BL, Wang QZ, Ma ZY, Liu Y, Yang K (2010) Constitutive flow behavior and hot workability of powder metallurgy processed 20 vol.% SiCP/2024Al composite. Mater Sci Eng A 527:7865–7872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tjong SC, Wu SQ, Zhu HG (1999) Wear behavior of in situ TiB2.Al2O3/Al and TiB2.Al2O3/Al±Cu composites. Compos Sci Technol 59:1341–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tesfay AW, Nath SK, Ray S (2009) Effect of transfer layer on dry sliding wear behavior of cast Al-based composites synthesized by addition of TiO2 and MoO3. Wear 266:1082–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maiti R, Chakraborty M (2008) Synthesis and characterization of molybdenum aluminide nanoparticles reinforced aluminium matrix composites. J Alloys Compd 458:450–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang F, Zhaon Y, Yang C, Fan N, Zhu J (2016) Effect of MoO3 on microstructure and mechanical properties of (Ti,Mo)Al/Al2O3 composites by in situ reactive hot pressing. Ceram Int 42:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoo SE, Seo M-K, Kim B-S, Park S-J (2015) Effect of MoO3 on mechanical interfacial behavior and anti-oxidation of carbon fibers-reinforced composites. J Indus Eng Chem 30:29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kang Q, He X, Ren S, Zhang L, Wu M, Guo C, Liu Q, Liu T, Qu X (2013) Effect of molybdenum carbide intermediate layers on thermal properties of copper–diamond composites. J Alloys Compd 576:380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cura ME, Liu XW, Kanerva U, Varjus S, Kivioja A, Soderberg O, Hannula SP (2015) Friction behavior of alumina/molybdenum composites and formation of MoO3-x phase at 400 C. Tribol Inter 87:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tang F, Anderson IE, Biner SB (2002) Solid state sintering and consolidation of Al powders and Al matrix composites. J Light Met 2:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martınez-Flores E, Negrete J, Torres-Villaseñor G (2003) Structure and properties of Zn–Al–Cu alloy reinforced with alumina particles. Mater Des 24:281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ravichandran M, Anandakrishnan V (2016) Hot upset studies on sintered (Al–TiO2–Gr) powder metallurgy hybrid composite. Strength Mater 48:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ogel B, Gurbuz R (2001) Microstructural characterization and tensile properties of hot pressed Al–SiC composites prepared from pure Al and Cu powders. Mater Sci Eng A 301:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ünlü BS (2008) Investigation of tribological and mechanical properties Al2O3–SiC reinforced Al composites manufactured by casting or P/M method. Mater Des 29:2002–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghita C, Popescu IN (2012) Experimental research and compaction behaviour modelling of aluminium based composites reinforced with silicon carbide particles. Comput Mater Sci 64:136–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moreno MF, González Oliver CJR (2011) Densification of Al powder and Al–Cu matrix composite (reinforced with 15% Saffil short fibres) during axial cold compaction. Powder Technol 206:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Corrochano J, Lieblich M, Ibáñez J (2011) The effect of ball milling on the microstructure of powder metallurgy aluminium matrix composites reinforced with MoSi2 intermetallic particles. Compos Part A 42:1093–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ravichandran M, Anandakrishnan V (2015) Optimization of P/M parameters to attain maximum strength in Al-10 wt.% MoO3 composite. J Mater Res 30:2380–2387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anilkumar Koppalkar R, Parveen A, Badiger GR, Ambika Prasad MVN (2009) Effect of molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) on the electrical conductivity of polyaniline. Physica B 404:1664–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ravichandran M, Naveen Sait A, Anandakrishnan V (2014) Al–TiO2–Gr powder metallurgy hybrid composites with cold upset forging. Rare Metals 33:686–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rahimian NP, Ehsani N (2010) Investigation of particle size and amount of alumina on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al matrix composite made by powder metallurgy. Mater Sci Eng A 527:1031–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tang F, Anderson Iver E, Gnaupel-Herold T, Prask H (2004) Pure Al matrix composites produced by vacuum hot pressing:tensile properties and strengthening mechanisms. Mater Sci Eng A 383:362–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knowles AJ, Jiang X, Galano M, Audebert F (2014) Microstructure and mechanical properties of 6061 Al alloy based composites with SiC nanoparticles. J Alloys Compds 615:S401–S405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scudino S, Liu G, Prashanth KG, Bartusch B, Surreddi KB, Murty BS, Eckert J (2009) Mechanical properties of Al-based metal matrix composites reinforced with Zr-based glassy particles produced by powder metallurgy. Acta Mater 57:2029–2039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Narayanasamy R, Anandakrishnan V, Pandey KS (2008) Effect of carbon content on instantaneous strain-hardening behavior of powder metallurgy steels. Mater Sci Eng A 497:505–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Narayanasamy R, Ramesh T, Pandey KS (2006) Some aspects on strain hardening behaviour in three dimensions of aluminium–iron powder metallurgy composite during cold upsetting. Mater Design 27:640–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tjong SC, Lau KC (1999) Properties and abrasive wear of TiB2/Al-4%Cu composites produced by hot isostatic pressing. Compos Sci Technol 59:2005–2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shalaby Essam AM, Yu CA, Besisa Dina HA, Daoud A, Abou El-khair MT (2017) A comparative study of thermal conductivity and tribological behavior of squeeze cast A359/AlN and A359/SiC composites. JMEPEG-ASM Inter.
  30. 30.
    Zhang P, Jie J, Gao Y, Li H, Cao Z, Wang T, Li T (2015) Preparation and properties of TiB2 particles reinforced Cu-Cr matrix composite. Mater Sci Eng A 642:398–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang Z, Sheng Y, Xu X, Li W (2015) Microstructural features and mechanical properties of in situ formed ZrB2/Cu composites. Adv Eng Mater 17:1338–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAnna UniversityMaduraiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringGovernment Polytechnic CollegeCoimbatoreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringChennai Institute of TechnologyChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations