Advertisement

Silicon

pp 1–7 | Cite as

High-Magnification SEM Micrograph of Siloxanes

  • Arzu Erol
Original Paper

Abstract

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) is a powerful and efficient microscopy for the analysis of nanomaterials. Although this imaging technique is common and several standard methods exist for chemical analysis, questions remain about the optimal magnification and voltage to be used. The chemical molecules are relatively sensitive to the electron beam. HMDS is as often as possible utilized for surface treatment at the covering of the photosensitive material on the wafer, and trimethyl silanol is created, together with alkali, by hydrolysis of HMDS. This study specifically represents the best imaging condition to HMDS and reaction products of organosilicons. The greatest challenges of working with organosilicons molecules is imaging and characterizing features on such a small scale by SEM. The results support the conclusion that, contrary to what is usually recommended, it is best to determine the structure of organosilicons molecules without spectroscopy. It has been a convenient method for the emergence of the structure of HMDS and reaction products.

Keywords

SEM Imaging HMDS Siloxanes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted under the supervision of a Prof. M. Hannig at Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Saarland.

References

  1. 1.
    Neves BRA et al (1999) Comparitive study of field emissionscanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy to access self-assembled monolayer coverage on any type of substrate. Microsc Microanal 5:413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castle JE, Zhdan PA (1997) Characterization of surface topography by SEM and SFM: problems and solutions. J Phys D: Appl Phys 30:722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crompton TR (2012) Comprehensive organometallic analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takei T, Kato K, Meguro A, Chikazawa M (1999) Infrared spectra of geminal and novel triple hydroxyl groups on silica surface. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 150:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vansant EF, Van Der Voort P, Vrancken KC (1995), Characterization and chemical modification of the silica surface. Elsevier ScienceGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Protasova LV, Grinberg EE, Bessarabov AM, Makarov VV, Polyanskii MA (1991) The mechanism and kinetics of the synthesis of hexamethyldisiloxane. Russ J Phys Chem 65(2):283–28Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gronheid R, Lithography Department IMEC, Al-Horr R, Dionex Corporation (2005) In-line monitoring of acid and base contaminants at low ppt-levels for 193 nm lithography. SPIEGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dallas AJ, Ding L, Exley J, Joriman J, Zastera D, Corporate Technology, Donaldson Company Inc., Joang B, Parsons J, Seguin K (2005) High Purity Products, Donaldson Company Inc., Removal of low concentrations of acid gases: issues and solutions. SPIEGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sonnenfeld A, Tun TM, Zajickova L, Kozlov KV, Wagner H-E, Behnke JF, Hippler R (2002) Deposition process based on organosilicon precursors in di-electric barrier discharges at atmospheric pressure—a comparison. Plasmas Polym 6(4):237–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reuter R, Rügner K, Ellerweg D, de los Arcos T, von Keudell A, Benedikt J (2011) The role of oxygen and surface reactions in the deposition of silicon oxide like films from HMDSO at atmospheric pressure, submitted to Plasma Processes and PolymersGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hegemann D, Schütz U, Fischer A (2005) Macroscopic plasma-chemical approach to plasma polymerization of HMDSO and CH4. Surf Coat Technol 200(1–4):458–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Theirich D, Soll C, Leu F, Engemann J (2003) Intermediate gas phase precursors during plasma CVD of HMDSO. Vacuum 71(3):349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhuravlev LT (2000) The surface chemistry of amorphous silica. Colloids Surf 173:1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nam NS, Tuan LQ, Son LT (2015) Synthesis and characterization of organically modified silica nanoparticles by epoxy resin. J Chem Appl 1(29):71–74Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jal PK, Patel S, Mishra BK (2004) Chemical modification of silica surface by immobilization of functional groups for extractive concentration of metal ions. Talanta 62:1005–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hannig C, Hannig M (2009) The oral cavity-a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clin Oral Invest 13:123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nam NS, Khang DN, Tuan LQ, Son LT (2016) Surface modification of silica nanoparticles by hexamethyldisilazane and n-butanol. Int J Env Tech Sci 2:31–37Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Butts M, Cella JA, Wood CD, Gillette G, Kerboua R, Leman J et al (2002) Silicones. In: Mark HF, Kroschwitz JI (eds) Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, pp 765–841 https://doi.org/10.1002/0471440264.pst338
  19. 19.
    Mojsiewicz-Pieńkowska K, Jamrógiewicz M, Szymkowska K, Krenczkowska D (2016) Direct human contact with siloxanes (silicones)—safety or risk part 1. Characteristics of siloxanes (silicones). Front Pharmacol 30(7):132Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mojsiewicz-Pieńkowska K, Szymkowska K, Glamowska D, Cal K, Jankowski Z, Jamrógiewicz M et al (2015) Consequences of overcoming the skin barrier by low molecular cyclic and linear methyl siloxanes (silicones). 5th international conference on clinical & experimental dermatology, New Orleans, USA, July 13–15. J Clin Exp Dermatol Res 6:60Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kurian P, Kasibhatla B, Daum J, Burns CA, Moosa A, Rosenthal KS et al (2003) Synthesis, permeability and biocompatibility of tricomponent membranes containing polyethylene glycol, polydimethylsiloxanes and polypentamethylcyclopentasiloxane domains. Biomaterials 24:3493–3503.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00189-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clarson SJ (2003) Synthesis and properties of silicones and silicone-modified materials. In: Clarson SJ, Fitzgerald JJ, Owen MJ, Smith SD, Van Dyke ME (eds) Silicones and silicone-modified materials: a concise overview, chap 1. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2003-0838
  23. 23.
    Genualdi S, Harner T, Cheng Y, Macleod M, Hansen KM, van Egmond R et al (2011) Global distribution of linear and cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes in air. Environ Sci Technol 8:3349–3354.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es200301j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kierkegaard A, McLachlan MS (2013) Determination of linear and cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes in air at a regional background site in Sweden. Atmos Environ 80:322–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yessi J, Siew CN, Noor AAO (2014) Investigation of CPD and HMDS sample preparation techniques for cervical cells in developing computer-aided screening system based on FE-SEM/EDX. ScientificWorldJournal 289817Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Biology and Genetic, Faculty of ScienceBulent Ecevit UniversityZonguldakTurkey

Personalised recommendations