pp 1–10 | Cite as

Numerical Simulation of Shot Peening Process on Equal Channel Angular Pressed Magnesium Alloy

  • Praveen T. R.
  • Gopi K. R.
  • H. Shivananda Nayaka
Original Paper


This paper presents the numerical simulation of inducing residual stresses on equal channel angular pressed (ECAP) magnesium alloy by shot peening process. Mg-Al-Mn (AM) series magnesium alloy was ECAP processed up to 4 passes using route BC. Microstructures were analysed and grain size reduced from 100 µm for the as-received sample to 3 µm for ECAP 4 pass sample. Tensile test was carried out and maximum tensile strength was found in ECAP 2 pass sample and decreased with higher ECAP passes. Grain refinement was characterized by optical microscopy, electron backscatter diffraction analysis (EBSD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Material (tensile) behaviour of 2 pass sample was implemented for finite element modelling. A finite element method was used to estimate the intensity of residual stresses developed due to shot peening in ECAP processed AM80 alloy. Simulation was done with different boundary condition such as impact velocity, geometry of shot-peen media, angle of impact and multiple impacts. The results are presented and the relationship between process parameters and the intensity of residual stresses are discussed. Increase in velocity of shot peening media showed an increase in the magnitude of residual stresses. Change in geometry of shot media altered the contact area between target and shot media during impact which influenced the magnitude of residual stresses and coverage area. The magnitude of residual stresses varied with the angle of impact and the multiple repeated impacts showed that the effective depth of residual stresses increased with the number of impacts.


Shot peening Numerical simulation AM80 ECAP EBSD XRD Residual stress Impact analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors would like to acknowledge CSIR-NAL, Bangalore for extending their numerical simulation facility to carry out simulations. Also, we would like to thank Dr. Udaya Bhat, Associate professor, NITK, India for his support in providing the laboratory facility.


  1. 1.
    Mordike BL, Ebert T (2001) Magnesium properties - application - potential. Mater Sci Eng A 302:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kainer K (2000) Magnesium Alloys and Their Applications. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbhGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsuchiya T, Watanabe K, Matsuda K, Kawabata T, Sakakibara K, Yamaguchi T, Saikawa S, Ikenu S (2011) Effect of Al and Mn Contents on Microstructure in AM-series Magnesium Alloys. Adv Mater Res 409:379–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    StJohn DH, Qian M, Easton MA, Cao P, Hildebrand Z (2005) Grain refinement of magnesium alloys. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 36:1669–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Valiev RZ, Langdon TG (2006) Principles of equal-channel angular pressing as a processing tool for grain refinement. Prog Mater Sci 51:881–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Figueiredo RB, Langdon TG (2010) Grain refinement and mechanical behavior of a magnesium alloy processed by ECAP. J Mater Sci 45:4827–4836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Akbaripanah F, Fereshteh-Saniee F, Mahmudi R, Kim HK (2013) Microstructural homogeneity, texture, tensile and shear behavior of AM60 magnesium alloy produced by extrusion and equal channel angular pressing. Mater Des 43:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hosaka T, Yoshihara S, Amanina I, Macdonald BJ (2017) Influence of grain refinement and residual stress on corrosion behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy processed by ECAP in RPMI- 1640 medium. Procedia Eng 184:432–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jorge AM, Prokofiev E, Triques MRM, Roche V, Botta WJ, Kiminami CS, Raab GI, Valiev RZ, Langdon TJ (2017) Effect of cold rolling on the structure and hydrogen properties of AZ91 and AM60d magnesium alloys processed by ECAP. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:21822–21831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kobayashi M, Matsui T, Murakami Y (1998) Mechanism of creation of compressive residual stress by shot peening. Int J Fatigue 20:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herzog R, Zinn W, Scholtes B, Wohlfahrt H (1996) The significance of Almen intensity for the generation of shot peening residual stresses. In: International conference of Shot Peening, pp 270–281Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang P, Lindemann J, Leyens C (2010) Shot peening on the high-strength wrought magnesium alloy AZ80-effect of peening media. J Mater Process Technol 210:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pour-Ali S, Kiani-Rashid AR, Babakhani A (2017) Surface nanocrystallization and gradient microstructural evolutions in the surface layers of 321 stainless steel alloy treated via severe shot peening. Vacuum 144:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Novelli M, Fundenberger JJ, Bocher P, Grosdidier T (2016) On the effectiveness of surface severe plastic deformation by shot peening at cryogenic temperature. Appl Surf Sci 389:1169–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wohlfahrt H (1984) The influence of peening conditions on the resulting distribution of residual stress. 2nd Int Conf Shot PeenGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al-Obaid YF (1995) Shot peening mechanics: experimental and theoretical analysis. Mech Mater 19:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wagner L (1999) Mechanical surface treatments on titanium, aluminum and magnesium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 263:210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abaqus (2011) Abaqus theory manual. NotesGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meguid SA, Shagal G, Stranart JC (1999) Finite element modelling of shot-peening residual stresses. J Mater Process Technol 92–93:401–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hong T, Ooi JY, Shaw B (2008) A numerical simulation to relate the shot peening parameters to the induced residual stresses. Eng Fail Anal 15:1097–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mylonas GI, Labeas G (2011) Numerical modelling of shot peening process and corresponding products: Residual stress, surface roughness and cold work prediction. Surf Coatings Technol 205:4480–4494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hu D, Gao Y, Meng F, Song J, Wang Y, Ren M, Wang R (2017) A unifying approach in simulating the shot peening process using a 3D random representative volume finite element model. Chinese J Aeronaut 30:1592–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Muralidhar A, Narendranath S, Shivananda Nayaka H (2013) Effect of equal channel angular pressing on AZ31 wrought magnesium alloys. J Magnes Alloy 1:336–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ASTM (2010) E112: Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain SizeGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    ASTM (2009) Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials 1Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, Levesque M (2010) An analytical approach to relate shot peening parameters to Almen intensity. Surf Coatings Technol 205:2055–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    OSK-Kiefer-GMBH Shot Peening Media and reconditioning Manual: 88–92, Malsch, Baden-Wurttemberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Akbaripanah F, Fereshteh-Saniee F, Mahmudi R, Kim HK (2013) The influences of extrusion and equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) processes on the fatigue behavior of AM60 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 565:308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jahadi R, Sedighi M, Jahed H (2014) ECAP Effect on the micro-structure and mechanical properties of AM30 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 593:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Christian JW, Mahajan S (1995) Deformation twinning. Prog Mater Sci 39:1–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Koike J (2005) Enhanced deformation mechanisms by anisotropic plasticity in polycrystalline Mg alloys at room temperature. Metall Mater Trans A 36:1689–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Seipp S, Wagner MF-X, Hockauf K, Schneider I, Meyer LW, Hockauf M (2012) Microstructure, crystallographic texture and mechanical properties of the magnesium alloy AZ31b after different routes of thermo-mechanical processing. Int J Plast 35:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kim WJ, Hong SI, Kim YS, Min SH, Jeong HT, Lee JD (2003) Texture development and its effect on mechanical properties of an AZ61 Mg alloy fabricated by equal channel angular pressing. Acta Mater 51:3293–3307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nan XL, Wang HY, Wu ZQ, Xue ES, Lei Zhang, Jiang QC (2013) Effect of c/a axial ratio on Schmid factors in hexagonal close-packed metals. Scr Mater 68:530–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nieh TG, Wadsworth J (1991) Hall-Petch relation in nanocrystalline solids. Scr Met Mater 25:955–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Majzoobi GH, Azizi R, Alavi Nia A (2005) A three-dimensional simulation of shot peening process using multiple shot impacts. J Mater Process Technol 164–165:1226–1234Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Praveen T. R.
    • 1
  • Gopi K. R.
    • 2
  • H. Shivananda Nayaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology KarnatakaSurathkalIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringRajeev Institute of TechnologyHassanIndia

Personalised recommendations