Advertisement

Silicon

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 2193–2199 | Cite as

Electrical Characterization of n-ZnO/c-Si 2D Heterojunction Solar Cell by Using TCAD Tools

  • N. Boukortt
  • S. Patanè
  • B. Hadri
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper investigates recent developments in Interdigitated Back Contact (IBC) solar cell physics and technology by using ATLAS Silvaco device simulator. The work has been focused on improvement of structural and electrical properties by using zinc oxide layer to passivate the front surface of a crystalline silicon (c-Si) substrate. In a silicon cells, the device performance crucially depends on the quality of the n-ZnO/c-Si heterojunction. Simulation results for various front dielectric material, emitter doping concentration, and semiconductor material for the front surface field (FSF) layer on the considered structure are reported and analyzed. These variations have a direct impact on the electrical device characteristics. We could determine the critical parameters of the cell and optimize its main parameters to obtain the highest performance for IBC solar cell. Therefore, we present our best results obtained recently and some guidelines to improve still more the efficiency of the devices. The optimization at 300 K led to the following results Jsc = 41.89 mA/cm2, Voc = 0.727 V, FF = 85.23 %, P\(_{\max }=\) 259.95 W/m-2, and η =25.99 % which are close with those found in different works. The structure simulation will simplify the manufacturing processes of solar cells; will thus reduce the costs while producing high outputs of photovoltaic conversion. Finally, we finish by a summary of the main advantages of this technology taking into account all the parameters described above.

Keywords

Solar cells IBC cells FSF layer ZnO Silvaco simulator 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Panasonic (2014) Panasonic HIT®; solar cell achieves world’s highest energy conversion efficiency of 25.6% at research level, [Press release] retrieved from http://news.panasonic.com/global/press/data/2014/04/en140410-4/en140410-4.html
  2. 2.
    Li Q et al (2016) Two dimensional simulation studies on amorphous silicon stack as front surface field for interdigitated back contact solar cells. Vacuum 125:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu W et al (2017) Multilayer MoOx/Ag/MoOx emitters in dopant-free silicon solar cells. Mater Lett 189:86–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ma C, Zhou Z et al (2011) Rapid large-scale preparation of ZnO nanowires for photocatalytic application. Nano Res Lett 6:536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou Z, Zhan C et al (2011) Rapid mass production of ZnO nanowires by a modified carbothermal reduction method. Mater Lett 65:832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kleider JP et al (2009) Electronic and structural properties of the amorphous/crystalline silicon interface. Thin Solid Films 517: 6386–6391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taguchi M et al (2014) 24.7% record efficiency HIT solar cell on thin silicon wafer. J Photovolt 4:96–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vasudevan R et al (2016) A thin-fi lm silicon/silicon hetero-junction hybrid solar cell for photoelectrochemical water-reduction applications. Sol Energ Mat Solar C 150:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma ZQ et al (2016) Realization of both high efficiency and quantum tunneling in QMSIS solar cells. Mater Today- Proc 3:454–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mat Desa MK et al (2016) Silicon back contact solar cell configuration: A pathway towards higher efficiency. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:1516–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rawat A et al (2014) Numerical simulations for high efficiency HIT solar cells using microcrystalline silicon as emitter and back surface field (BSF) layers. Solar Energy 110:691–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silvaco International (2016) Atlas user’s manual device simulation software. Silvaco International, Santa ClaraGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shaker A, Zekry A (2010) A New and Simple Model for Plasma- and Doping-Induced Band Gap Narrowing. J Electron Devices 8:293–299Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hernández Como N, Morales Acevedo A (2010) Simulation of heterojunction silicon solar cells with AMPS-1D. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 94:62–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Renewable Resource Data Center (2004) National Renewable Energy Laboratory http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/spectra/am1.5/
  16. 16.
    Yang G et al (2016) IBC c-Si solar cells based on ion-implanted poly-silicon passivating contacts. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 158:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Masuko K et al (2014) Achievement of more than 25% conversion efficiency with crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cell. IEEE J. Photovolt. 4:1433–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith DD et al (2016) Silicon solar cells with total area efficiency above 25%. In: 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Special Conference. IEEE, pp 3351–3355Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Belarbi M, Beghdad M, Mekemeche A (2016) Simulation and optimization of n-type interdigitated back contact silicon heterojunction (IBC-SiHJ) solar cell structure using Silvaco Tcad Atlas. Solar Energy 127:206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ide D (2008) Excellent power-generating properties by using the HIT structure, IEEE Conference Publications, Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, PVSC’08 33rd IEEEGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical Engineering DepartmentCollege of Engineering & Petroleum Kuwait UniversityKuwaitKuwait
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche e Informatiche, Scienze Fisiche e Scienze Della TerraUniversity of MessinaMessinaItaly
  3. 3.Electromagnetism and Guided Optic Laboratory, Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Abdelhamid Ibn BadisMostaganemAlgeria

Personalised recommendations