Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Capnography access and use in Kenya and Ethiopia

Accès à et utilisation de la capnographie au Kenya et en Éthiopie

  • Reports of Original Investigations
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Lack of access to safe and affordable anesthesia and monitoring equipment may contribute to higher rates of morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While capnography is standard in high-income countries, use in LMICs is not well studied. We evaluated the association of capnography use with patient and procedure-related characteristics, as well as the association of capnography use and mortality in a cohort of patients from Kenya and Ethiopia.

Methods

For this retrospective observational study, we used historical cohort data from Kenya and Ethiopia from 2014 to 2020. Logistic regression was used to study the association of capnography use (primary outcome) with patient/procedure factors, and the adjusted association of intraoperative, 24-hr, and seven-day mortality (secondary outcomes) with capnography use.

Results

A total of 61,792 anesthetic cases were included in this study. Tertiary or secondary hospital type (compared with primary) was strongly associated with use of capnography (odds ratio [OR], 6.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.67 to 6.93 and OR, 6.88; 95% CI, 6.40 to 7.40, respectively), as was general (vs regional) anesthesia (OR, 4.83; 95% CI, 4.41 to 5.28). Capnography use was significantly associated with lower odds of intraoperative mortality in patients who underwent general anesthesia (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.48). Nevertheless, fully-adjusted models for 24-hr and seven-day mortality showed no evidence of association with capnography.

Conclusion

Capnography use in LMICs is substantially lower compared with other standard anesthesia monitors. Capnography was used at higher rates in tertiary centres and with patients undergoing general anesthesia. While this study revealed decreased odds of intraoperative mortality with capnography use, further studies need to confirm these findings.

Résumé

Objectif

Le manque d’accès à des équipements d’anesthésie et de monitorage sécuritaires et abordables peut contribuer à des taux plus élevés de morbidité et de mortalité dans les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire (PRFI). Alors que la capnographie est une modalité standard dans les pays à revenu élevé, son utilisation dans les PRFI n’est pas bien étudiée. Nous avons évalué l’association de l’utilisation de la capnographie avec les caractéristiques des patient·es et des interventions, ainsi que l’association de l’utilisation de la capnographie et de la mortalité dans une cohorte de patient·es du Kenya et d’Éthiopie.

Méthode

Pour cette étude observationnelle rétrospective, nous avons utilisé des données de cohortes historiques du Kenya et de l’Éthiopie de 2014 à 2020. Une régression logistique a été utilisée pour étudier l’association entre l’utilisation de la capnographie (critère d’évaluation principal) et les facteurs patient·es/interventions, ainsi que pour étudier l’association ajustée entre la mortalité peropératoire, à 24 h et à sept jours (critères d’évaluation secondaires) et l’utilisation de la capnographie.

Résultats

Au total, 61 792 cas d’anesthésie ont été inclus dans cette étude. Le type d’hôpital tertiaire ou secondaire (par rapport à un établissement primaire) était fortement associé à l’utilisation de la capnographie (rapport de cotes [RC], 6,27; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 5,67 à 6,93 et RC, 6,88; IC 95 %, 6,40 à 7,40, respectivement), tout comme l’était l’anesthésie générale (vs régionale) (RC, 4,83; IC 95 %, 4,41 à 5,28). L’utilisation de la capnographie était significativement associée à une probabilité plus faible de mortalité peropératoire chez les patient·es ayant reçu une anesthésie générale (RC, 0,31; IC 95 %, 0,17 à 0,48). Néanmoins, les modèles entièrement ajustés pour la mortalité à 24 heures et à sept jours n’ont montré aucune donnée probante d’association avec la capnographie.

Conclusion

L’utilisation de la capnographie dans les PRFI est considérablement moins répandue que celle d’autres moniteurs d’anesthésie standard. La capnographie a été utilisée à des taux plus élevés dans les centres tertiaires et chez des patient·es sous anesthésie générale. Bien que cette étude ait révélé une diminution de la probabilité de mortalité peropératoire avec l’utilisation de la capnographie, d’autres études doivent confirmer ces résultats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Int J Obstet Anesth 2016; 25: 75–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.09.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bharati SJ, Chowdhury T, Gupta N, Schaller B, Cappellani RB, Maguire D. Anaesthesia in underdeveloped world: present scenario and future challenges. Niger Med J 2014; 55: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0300-1652.128146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Eichhorn JH. Review article: practical current issues in perioperative patient safety. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 111–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-012-9852-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for moderate procedural sedation and analgesia 2018: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Dental Association, American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists, and Society of Interventional Radiology. Anesthesiology 2018; 128: 437–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000002043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Long B, Koyfman A, Vivirito MA. Capnography in the emergency department: a review of uses, waveforms, and limitations. J Emerg Med 2017; 53: 829–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nassar BS, Schmidt GA. Capnography during critical illness. Chest 2016; 149: 576–85. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.15-1369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chrimes N, Higgs A, Hagberg CA, et al. Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a consensus guideline from the Project for Universal Management of Airways and international airway societies. Anaesthesia 2022; 77: 1395–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 617–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wollner E, Nourian MM, Booth W, et al. Impact of capnography on patient safety in high- and low-income settings: a scoping review. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125: e88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jooste R, Roberts F, Mndolo S, et al. Global Capnography Project (GCAP): implementation of capnography in Malawi—an international anaesthesia quality improvement project. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 158–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gelb AW, Morriss WW, Johnson W, Merry AF. World Health Organization-World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WHO-WFSA) international standards for a safe practice of anesthesia. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1111-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newton MW, Hurt SE, McEvoy MD, et al. Pediatric perioperative mortality in Kenya: a prospective cohort study from 24 hospitals. Anesthesiology 2020; 132: 452–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000003070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sileshi B, Newton MW, Kiptanui J, et al. Monitoring anesthesia care delivery and perioperative mortality in Kenya utilizing a provider-driven novel data collection tool. Anesthesiology 2017; 127: 250–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000001713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alshibli AK, Teklehaimanot MG, Seyoum R, et al. Changes in surgical volume and outcomes during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic at two tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. Anesth Analg 2022; 134: 1297–307. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrell FE Jr. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York: Springer; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Z. Multiple imputation with multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) package. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4: 30. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.12.63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 2011; 45: 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. VanderWeele TJ, Ding P. Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-value. Ann Intern Med 2017; 167: 268–74. https://doi.org/10.7326/m16-2607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. The R Foundation. R: the R Project for statistical computing. Available from URL: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed June 2023).

  21. Biccard BM, Madiba TE, Kluyts HL, et al. Perioperative patient outcomes in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet 2018; 391: 1589–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30001-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramlan AA, Lestari MI, Banadji Y, Arif SK. A national survey of capnography utilization among anaesthesiologists in Indonesia. Trends Anaesth Crit Care 2021; 40: 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2021.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baxter LS, Ravelojaona VA, Rakotoarison HN, et al. An observational assessment of anesthesia capacity in madagascar as a prerequisite to the development of a national surgical plan. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 2001–7. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nourian MM, Kolbay P, Hoehne S, et al. Investigating capnography innovation for better patient monitoring in the resource limited surgical setting. Surg Innov 2019; 26: 124–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350618813252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brouillette MA, Aidoo AJ, Hondras MA, et al. Anesthesia capacity in Ghana: a teaching hospital's resources, and the national workforce and education. Anesth Analg 2017; 125: 2063–71. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. PaedSurg Africa Research Collaboration. Paediatric surgical outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa: a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6: e004406. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004406

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kodali BS. Capnography in pediatrics. Available from URL: https://www.capnography.com/pediatrics (accessed June 2023).

  28. Lifebox Foundation. Smile Train and Lifebox launch request for proposals for capnography device. Available from URL: https://www.lifebox.org/news/capnography-device-rfp/ (accessed June 2023).

  29. Gelb AW, McDougall RJ, Gore-Booth J, Mainland PA, WFSA Ad Hoc Capnometry Workgroup. The World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists minimum capnometer specifications 2021—a guide for health care decision makers. Anesth Analg 2021; 133: 1132–7. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Funk LM, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. Global operating theatre distribution and pulse oximetry supply: an estimation from reported data. Lancet 2010; 376: 1055–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60392-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Albert V, Mndolo S, Harrison EM, O'Sullivan E, Wilson IH, Walker IA. Lifebox pulse oximeter implementation in Malawi: evaluation of educational outcomes and impact on oxygen desaturation episodes during anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 686–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lifebox Foundation. Our work. Available from URL: https://www.lifebox.org/our-work/ (accessed June 2023).

  33. Lifebox Founadtion. Smile Train—Lifebox safe surgery and anesthesia initiative. Available from URL: https://www.lifebox.org/smiletrain/ (accessed June 2023).

  34. Lipnick MS, Mavoungou P, Gelb AW. The global capnography gap: a call to action. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 147–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Enohumah KO, Imarengiaye CO. Factors associated with anaesthesia-related maternal mortality in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 206–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00945.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Glenshaw M, Madzimbamuto FD. Anaesthesia associated mortality in a district hospital in Zimbabwe: 1994 to 2001. Cent Afr J Med 2005; 51: 39–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Buck N, Devlin HB, Lunn JN. The Report of a Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths. London: The Nuffield Trust; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Walker I, Wilson I, Bogod D. Anaesthesia in developing countries. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05288.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Maziar M. Nourian and Bantayehu Sileshi contributed to all aspects of this manuscript, including study conception and design; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and drafting the article. Amany Alshibli contributed to analysis and interpretation of data and drafting of the article. John Kamau, Susan Nabulindo, Denis Amollo, Rahel Seyoum, Masresha G. Teklehaimanot, Gebrehiwot A. Tegu, and Haftom B. Desta contributed to data collection and analysis. Jennifer Connell contributed to data analysis and drafting the article. Svetlana Eden contributed to data analysis, data interpretation, and drafting the article. Mark Newton contributed to study conception and design and manuscript review. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Phillis Ngure, Mercy Kithengi, Wycliffe Odhiambo, and Aziz Munubi for their work as data managers. In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge KRNA students at Kijabe Hospital and nonphysician anesthesia students at Ayder Hospital, Felege Hiwot Hospital, and Tibebe Ghion Hospital for helping with data collection. Lastly, the authors would like to acknowledge Martha Tanner for her editorial support.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding statement

This work was supported by grants from the GE Foundation and ELMA Foundation.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Adrian Gelb, Guest Editor, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maziar M. Nourian MD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 154 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nourian, M.M., Alshibli, A., Kamau, J. et al. Capnography access and use in Kenya and Ethiopia. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth 71, 95–106 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02607-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02607-y

Keywords

Navigation