Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Point-of-care lung and cardiac ultrasound (LUCAS) study in hip fracture patients: a prospective cohort study

Évaluation de l’échographie ciblée pulmonaire et cardiaque au chevet (LUCAS) chez des patient·es avec fracture de hanche : une étude de cohorte prospective

  • Reports of Original Investigations
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A clinical conflict often presented with hip fracture patients is whether to proceed with timely surgery or delay surgery until a formal echocardiogram is conducted. This study aimed to assess the impact of incorporating point-of-care lung and cardiac ultrasound (LUCAS) scans as part of the preoperative assessment for hip fracture patients.

Methods

We recruited 225 consecutive adult patients booked for urgent hip arthroplasty surgery. A LUCAS scan was performed for each patient. The anesthesiologists were asked to provide their anesthetic plans before and after acknowledging the results of the LUCAS scans. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of changes to the anesthetic plan. The secondary outcomes included anesthesiologists’ opinions of the LUCAS scans.

Results

One-hundred-ninety-eight patients were included. The majority of LUCAS findings were not severe. A common abnormal finding was hypovolemia (31%). One-hundred-and-six anesthetic management decisions were changed, with 59 of these changes being an escalation of the anesthetic plan, and 47 of these changes being a de-escalation. Eighty-three percent of anesthesiologists agreed that LUCAS affirmed their anesthetic plans and should be an integral part of the perioperative assessment.

Conclusion

This study found that LUCAS scans did not significantly alter the anesthetic plan for hip fracture patients. Nevertheless, LUCAS scans can rule out severe cardiopulmonary conditions and allow for both escalation and de-escalation of care. In the setting of early hip surgery, LUCAS presents a viable option in selected patients to address the unmet need to allow for both timely surgery and comprehensive patient evaluation.

Study registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03275129); registered 8 July 2018.

Résumé

Objectif

Une interrogation clinique qui existe souvent avec les patient·es se présentant avec une fracture de hanche est de savoir s’il faut procéder à une intervention chirurgicale rapidement ou retarder la chirurgie jusqu’à ce qu’un échocardiogramme formel soit réalisé. Cette étude visait à évaluer l’impact de l’intégration de l’échographie ciblée pulmonaire et cardiaque (LUCAS, Lung and Cardiac ultrasound) dans le cadre de l’évaluation préopératoire des personnes ayant subi une fracture de la hanche.

Méthode

Nous avons recruté 225 patient·es adultes consécutif·ves devant bénéficier d’une arthroplastie urgente de la hanche. Une échographie de type LUCAS a été réalisée pour chaque patient·e. On a demandé aux anesthésiologistes de fournir leurs plans anesthésiques avant et après avoir pris connaissance des résultats des échographies de type LUCAS. Le critère d’évaluation principal était un résultat composite des modifications apportées au plan anesthésique. Les critères d’évaluation secondaires comprenaient les opinions des anesthésiologistes sur les échographies de type LUCAS.

Résultats

Cent quatre-vingt-dix-huit patient·es ont été inclus·es. La majorité des résultats de l’échographie de type LUCAS n’étaient pas graves. Un résultat anormal courant était l’hypovolémie (31 %). Cent six décisions de prise en charge anesthésique ont été modifiées, 59 de ces changements étant une escalade du plan anesthésique et 47 de ces changements étant une réduction. Quatre-vingt-trois pour cent des anesthésiologistes ont convenu que l’échographie de type LUCAS confirmait leurs plans anesthésiques et devrait faire partie intégrante de l’évaluation périopératoire.

Conclusion

Cette étude a révélé que les échographies de type LUCAS ne modifiaient pas de manière significative le plan anesthésique pour les patient·es se présentant avec une fracture de hanche. Néanmoins, les échographies de type LUCAS peuvent exclure des affections cardiopulmonaires graves et permettre à la fois d’augmenter ou de réduire les soins périopératoires. Dans le cadre d’une chirurgie précoce de la hanche, l’échographie de type LUCAS présente une option viable chez une patientèle sélectionnée pour répondre à un besoin non satisfait afin de permettre à la fois une chirurgie rapide et une évaluation complète des patient·es.

Enregistrement de l’étude

www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03275129); enregistrée le 8 juillet 2018.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Groff H, Kheir MM, George J, Azboy I, Higuera CA, Parvizi J. Causes of in-hospital mortality after hip fractures in the elderly. Hip Int 2018; 30: 204–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700019835160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Ohe Y. Is operative delay associated with increased mortality of hip fracture patients? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Can J Anesth 2007; 55: 146–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03016088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pincus D, Ravi B, Wasserstein D, et al. Association between wait time and 30-day mortality in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. JAMA 2017; 318: 1994–2003. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.17606

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. HIP ATTACK Investigators. Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK): an international, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 395: 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30058-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Health Quality Ontario. Hip Fracture: care for people with fragility fractures. Available from URL: https://www.hqontario.ca/Evidence-to-Improve-Care/Quality-Standards/View-all-Quality-Standards/Hip-Fracture (accessed February 2023).

  6. Griffiths R, Babu S, Dixon P, et al. Guideline for the management of hip fractures 2020: Guideline by the Association of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 2021; 76: 225–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sobolev B, Guy P, Sheehan KJ, et al. Mortality effects of timing alternatives for hip fracture surgery. CMAJ 2018; 190: E923–32. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.171512

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheehan KJ, Sobolev B, Villán YFV, Guy P. Patient and system factors of time to surgery after hip fracture: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e016939. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016939

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Canty DJ, Royse CF. Audit of anaesthetist-performed echocardiography on perioperative management decisions for non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 352–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Canty DJ, Royse CF, Kilpatrick D, Williams DL, Royse AG. The impact of pre-operative focused transthoracic echocardiography in emergency non-cardiac surgery patients with known or risk of cardiac disease. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 714–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07118.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Canty DJ, Royse CF, Kilpatrick D, Bowyer A, Royse AG. The impact on cardiac diagnosis and mortality of focused transthoracic echocardiography in hip fracture surgery patients with increased risk of cardiac disease: a retrospective cohort study. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 1202–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07300.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cowie B. Three years’ experience of focused cardiovascular ultrasound in the peri‐operative period. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 268–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06622.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cowie B. Focused transthoracic echocardiography predicts perioperative cardiovascular morbidity. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26: 989–93. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2012.06.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heiberg J, El-Ansary D, Canty DJ, Royse AG, Royse CF. Focused echocardiography: a systematic review of diagnostic and clinical decision-making in anaesthesia and critical care. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 1091–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bøtker MT, Vang ML, Grøfte T, Sloth E, Frederiksen CA. Routine pre‐operative focused ultrasonography by anesthesiologists in patients undergoing urgent surgical procedures. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014; 58: 807–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Acosta CM, Maidana GA, Jacovitti D, et al. Accuracy of transthoracic lung ultrasound for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 1370–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000000231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hyacinthe AC, Broux C, Francony G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in the acute assessment of common thoracic lesions after trauma. Chest 2012; 141: 1177–83. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-0208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smallwood N, Miller A, Walden A, Hew M, Tay TR, Rahman NM. Should point-of-care ultrasonography replace stethoscopes in acute respiratory failure? BMJ 2019; 366: I5225. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest 2008; 134: 117–25. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-2800

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Pincus D, Wasserstein D, Ravi B, et al. Reporting and evaluating wait times for urgent hip fracture surgery in Ontario, Canada. CMAJ 2018; 190: E702–9. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chui J, Lavi R, Hegazy AF, et al. Identifying barriers to the use of ultrasound in the perioperative period: a survey of southwestern Ontario anesthesiologists. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4040-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Jason Chui contributed to study design, grant application, ethics application, patient recruitment, data collection, data analysis, and writing up of the first draft of the paper. Ahmed F. Hegazy, Mark German, and Camila Arango-Ferreira contributed to patient recruitment, data collection, and revision of the paper. Lee-Anne Fochesato contributed to grant application, ethics application, and revision of the paper. Ronit Lavi contributed to study design, grant application, and revision of the paper. Daniel Bainbridge contributed to study design, patient recruitment, data collection, and revision of the paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Innovation Fund of the Alternative Funding Plan of the Academic Health Sciences Centres of Ontario. We acknowledge Drs Ronit Lavi and Daniel Bainbridge, who contributed equally to this study.

Disclosures

The authors declare no competing interests.

Funding statement

This study was supported by the Innovation Fund of the Alternative Funding Plan of the Academic Health Sciences Centres of Ontario. The funding sources have no role in study design and conduct, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing and submission.

Prior conference presentations

An abstract was submitted to Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society Annual meeting (24–26 June 2022, Halifax, NS, Canada).

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Stephan K. W. Schwarz, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Chui MBChB, MSc.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 234 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chui, J., Hegazy, A.F., German, M. et al. Point-of-care lung and cardiac ultrasound (LUCAS) study in hip fracture patients: a prospective cohort study. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth 70, 1474–1485 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02511-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02511-5

Keywords

Navigation