Skip to main content

Accuracy of blood glucose measurements using the NOVA StatStrip® glucometer during cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study

Précision des mesures de la glycémie prises avec le glucomètre StatStrip® de NOVA pendant une chirurgie cardiaque : une étude observationnelle prospective



The Nova StatStrip® Glucose Hospital Meter System (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA) is United States Food and Drug Administration approved for point-of-care use in critically ill patients, but its use during cardiac surgery has not been evaluated. In this study, we compare glucose values obtained during cardiac surgery by StatStrip® with values obtained by a blood gas analyzer.


Blood glucose concentrations were analyzed in 121 patients by the StatStrip point- of-care test (POCT) glucose monitor and the GEM® Premier™ 3000 blood gas analyzer (Instrumentation Laboratory Company, Bedford MA, USA). Arterial blood samples were taken at baseline (before surgery), before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), during early and late CPB, and 30 min after CPB. Accuracy of the StatStrip glucometer was analyzed using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) POCT12-A3 criteria (criterion 1; 95% of samples should be ± 0.66 mMol·L−1 of reference glucose values < 5.5 mMol·L−1 and ± 12.5% for reference glucose values > 5.5 mMol·L−1, criterion 2; 98% of samples should be ± 0.83 mMol·L−1 of reference glucose values < 4.1 mMol·L−1 or 20% of the reference glucose for values > 4.1 mMol·L−1).


The accuracy of StatStrip glucose measurements at baseline (99%, 100%) and before CPB (95%, 98%), but not during (early: 84%, 97%; late: 83%, 96%) and after (92%, 100%) CPB, satisfied the CLSI POCT12-A3 criteria.


Arterial blood glucose measurement by StatStrip was accurate before CPB, but lacked accuracy during and after CPB. Glucose values should be interpreted with caution when intensive glucose control protocols are being used during cardiac surgery.

Trial registration (NCT02729064); registered 5 April, 2016.



Le glucomètre hospitalier StatStrip® de Nova (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, É.-U.) est approuvé par la FDA (Food and Drug Administration) américaine pour une utilisation au chevet chez les patients en état critique, mais son utilisation n’a pas été évaluée en chirurgie cardiaque. Dans cette étude, nous avons comparé les valeurs glycémiques obtenues par le lecteur StatStrip® et les valeurs obtenues par un analyseur des gaz du sang pendant une chirurgie cardiaque.


Les concentrations glycémiques de 121 patients ont été analysées en utilisant le moniteur glycémique StatStrip et l’analyseur de gaz sanguins GEM® Premier™ 3000 (Instrumentation Laboratory Company, Bedford, MA, É.-U.). Des échantillons de sang artériel ont été prélevés avant la chirurgie, avant la circulation extracorporelle (CEC), au début et à la fin de la CEC et 30 min après la CEC. La précision du glucomètre StatStrip a été analysée à l’aide des critères de l’Institut des normes cliniques et de laboratoire (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)) POCT12-A3 (1er critère; 95 % des échantillons doivent être à l’intérieur de ± 0,66 mMol·L−1 des valeurs glycémiques de référence < 5,5 mMol·L−1 et ± 12,5 % pour les valeurs glycémiques de référence > 5,5 mMol·L−1, 2ème critère; 98 % des échantillons doivent être à l’intérieur de ± 0,83 mMol·L−1 des valeurs glycémiques de référence < 4,1 mMol·L−1 ou 20 % du taux glycémique de référence pour les valeurs > 4,1 mMol·L−1).


La précision des mesures glycémiques prises par le StatStrip avant l’opération (99 %, 100 %) et avant la CEC (95 %, 98 %), mais non durant (début : 84 %, 97 %; fin : 83 %, 96 %) et après (92 %,100 %) la CEC, respectait les critères POCT12-A3 du CLSI. <0}


La mesure de la glycémie artérielle réalisée avec le StatStrip était précise avant la CEC mais a manqué de précision pendant et après la CEC. Les valeurs glycémiques devraient donc être interprétées avec prudence lorsque des protocoles intensifs de contrôle glycémique sont utilisés pendant une chirurgie cardiaque.

Enregistrement de l’étude (NCT02729064); enregistrée le 5 avril 2016.

It is well recognized that acute changes in glycemic control (i.e., increased or decreased circulating glucose concentrations) are associated with poor outcome after surgery.1 Accurate, precise, and timely measurement of blood glucose is therefore an important element of modern perioperative care.

Glucose values can be assessed using laboratory serum and plasma glucose analysis, as well as by whole blood and capillary glucose measurement using blood gas analyzers (BGA) or other glucometers. Glucose analysis in the laboratory (i.e., the gold standard)2 may not provide results fast enough to promptly and effectively treat hypo- or hyperglycemic episodes in the operating room. Hence, perioperatively, glycemia is routinely assessed by point-of-care test (POCT) devices such as glucometers and BGA.

In 2014, the StatStrip® Glucose Hospital Meter System (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA), the predominantly used POCT glucometer in North America (70% of POCT glucometer sales in 2018), received United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for POCT in the critically ill.3 While its accuracy in the intensive care unit appears to be well documented, its use during major surgery has not been evaluated.

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the Nova StatStrip device in testing glucose levels in patients undergoing open-heart surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We hypothesized that arterial whole blood samples analyzed with this glucometer would meet the accuracy criteria as defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) POCT12-A3 guideline4 and/or the consensus-based Parkes error grid5 of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO15197:2013), which was originally developed for patients with type-1 diabetes mellitus requiring subcutaneous insulin therapy.6


This study was a post hoc exploratory study of blood samples that were obtained and analyzed from participants in a prospective randomized-controlled trial of intranasal insulin in surgical patients ( NCT02729064; registered on 5 April, 2016). The primary aim of the original trial was to study the effect of two intranasal doses of insulin (40 IU and 80 IU) on glycemic control during cardiac surgery requiring CPB.7 This sub-study was conducted at the Royal Victoria Hospital (McGill University Health Center MUHC, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) between 21 September 2016 and 14 March 2018.


All patients gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by our institutional ethics review board on 1 September, 2016. We enrolled patients (> 18 yr old) undergoing elective cardiac surgery requiring CPB. The exclusion criteria included procedures with anticipated deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, planned use of drugs that effect glycemia during the first two hours of surgery (e.g., insulin, steroids, epinephrine), allergy to insulin, acromegaly, Cushing’s syndrome, hyperthyroidism, pheochromocytoma, pregnancy, and a baseline blood glucose < 3.9 mMol·L−1.7

Before surgery, we recorded the patients’ age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, Euroscore-II,8 hematocrit, plasma creatinine, left ventricular ejection function, and comorbidities.

Anesthetic care

Oral hypoglycemic drugs were discontinued 12 hr before surgery, and a subcutaneous sliding scale insulin regimen was used in patients at risk of hyperglycemia (> 10 mMol·L−1) or hypoglycemia (< 4 mMol·L−1). Anesthetic care included the use of standard anesthesia monitors9 that were supplemented by central venous or pulmonary artery catheters and transesophageal echocardiography. Midazolam, propofol, sufentanil, sevoflurane, and a depolarizing or non-depolarizing muscle relaxant were given during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The inhaled oxygen concentration was adjusted to 50%–100% based on the surgical procedure and the patients’ blood oxygen saturation. Normal saline solution and/or Ringer’s lactate were used as intravenous fluids. Systolic blood pressure (BP) was maintained at 100 mmHg before and after CPB with the mean arterial pressure during CPB maintained at 50–70 mmHg using norepinephrine (1–10 μg·kg−1·hr−1) as needed. Body temperature (BT) was maintained at 32–36° during CPB. Red blood cells were administrated when the hematocrit was < 25%. Before CPB, heparin 400 IU·kg−1 was administered intravenously followed by additional doses, if necessary, to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) of > 480 sec. Protamine was administered on a 1:1 ratio after separation from CPB. Cardioplegia solution was free of glucose and mannitol and consisted of high-dose (100 mEq·L−1) potassium to induce and maintain cardiac arrest.

Blood glucose was measured every ten to 30 min during surgery to clarify whether intranasal insulin affected glucose values.7 When the blood glucose measured by BGA was < 4.0 mMol·L−1, 10ml of 20% dextrose with phosphate 30 mMol·L−1 was administered and a continuous dextrose infusion was started at 20 mL·hr−1. When the blood glucose concentration was > 10.0 mMol·L−1, an insulin infusion of 2 units·hr−1 was initiated to maintain the blood glucose between 4.0 and 10.0 mMol·L−1.

We also recorded the duration of anesthesia, surgery, CPB, and aortic cross clamping.

Glucose measurement protocol

Arterial whole blood samples were drawn from a catheter placed in either the radial, femoral, or brachial artery. Glucose concentrations were collected in a 3-mL syringe (without any additives) and analyzed by the StatStrip glucometer with additional blood collected in a 3-mL lithium heparin blood gas syringe (or a regular syringe during heparinization) for analysis in a GEM® Premier™ 3000® (Instrumentation Laboratory Company, Bedford, MA, USA) blood gas analyzer. Blood glucose analyses were performed within two minutes of blood collection.

Samples were collected at five time-points: baseline (before surgery), pre-CPB (before CPB after heparinization), during early CPB (30 min after establishing full CPB; CPB1), during late CPB (one to two hours after establishing full CPB; CPB2), and post-CPB (30 min after separation of CPB and the administration of protamine).

The following data were recorded at the five above time-points: arterial pH, pO2, pCO2, lactate, hematocrit, ACT, (BT, nasal, and bladder), BP (systolic, diastolic, and mean), heart rate (HR), and catecholamine infusion rate.

Study outcomes

The primary outcome was the accuracy of blood glucose values obtained by the StatStrip glucometer, which was defined by the criteria specified by the POCT12-A3 guideline4 of the CLSI and/or criteria established by the ISO 15197:2013.6

The two CLSI POCT12-A3 criteria, both of which needed to be met, were as follows4: criterion 1: 95% of samples should be within ± 0.66 mMol·L−1 of reference glucose values < 5.5 mMol·L−1 and ± 12.5% for reference glucose values > 5.5 mMol·L−1; and criterion 2: 98% of samples should be within ± 0.83 mMol·L−1 of reference glucose values < 4.1 mMol·L−1 or 20% of the reference glucose for values > 4.1 mMol·L−1 (Table 4) (Fig. 2). We estimated that a minimum of 100 samples would be needed to determine the accuracy. When 98 of 100 samples meet the criterion, the 95% confidential interval (CI) is 93 to 100%, and when 95 of 100 samples meet the criterion, the 95% CI is 89 to 98% consistent with the ISO 15197:2013.6 Clinical accuracy was acceptable when 99% of samples were within zones A and B on the Parkes error grid.5,10 The Parkes error grid is divided into five risk zones.5 The five risk zones were illustrated in Figure 3 and described in Table 1. In agreement with previous protocols, arterial blood glucose values measured by BGA were considered the reference.11,12

Table 1 Five risk zones on the Parkes error grid

When samples did not meet the above criteria, an additional post hoc exploratory analysis was performed to determine whether clinical variables, laboratory or hemodynamic parameters, and heparinization were associated with the discrepancy of glucose values obtained by the two methods and the accuracy of the StatStrip glucose measurements.

Statistical analysis

Preoperative, surgical, and laboratory data are summarized using descriptive statistics. Categorical variables are described as counts and percentages. All data were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Continuous variables with normal distribution are presented as mean (standard deviation) and variables with skewed distribution as median [interquartile range (IQR)].

The differences between laboratory and hemodynamic data at five time-points were compared using the Friedman test. Patients with missing data were excluded.

Accuracy was analyzed using the criteria defined by the CLSI POCT12-A3 guideline4 for hospital POCT glucometers and by ISO 15197:2013 Parkes error grid for self-monitoring blood glucose glucometers used for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

The Spearman’s rank correlation was used to determine whether BT, laboratory (arterial pH, pO2, pCO2, lactate, Hematocrit, ACT) and hemodynamic parameters (mean BP, catecholamine infusion rate) were related to the difference of glucose values obtained by the two methods. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine whether blood transfusion and heparinization had an influence on the absolute difference of glucose values obtained by the two methods.

A logistic regression model was used for all samples to assess the relationship between accuracy defined by the CLSI POCT12-A3 criteria—i.e., whether each point-of-care glucose value is within ± 0.66 mMol·L−1 of reference glucose values < 5.5 mMol·L−1 and ± 12.5% for reference glucose values > 5.5 mMol·L−1 (criterion 1 in CLSI POCT12-A3) and possible factors. Considering the Spearman’s rank correlation and the Mann–Whitney U test, possible factors were put into the logistic regression model. Because multi-colinearity among covariates can give spurious results, backward stepwise procedures were performed to identify independently associated variables, and odds ratios were calculated.

When significant continuous variables were detected, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. The area under the curve (AUC) is a measure of the parameter’s accuracy (AUC = 0.5, no better than chance and no prediction possible; AUC = 1.0, best possible prediction). The optimal hematocrit cut-off point for StatStrip glucometer usage was defined by the Youden index [maximum (sensitivity + specificity − 1)].

Sample size

According to the CLSI POCT12-A3 guidelines, a minimum of 100 samples are needed to determine accuracy in a given patient population. Assuming that approximately 20% of patients would have missing data, we intended to analyze a minimum of 120 patients. To evaluate whether the data set was suitable for accurately characterizing the relationship between two measurement procedures, we calculated the Spearman correlation after data collection.4

All tests used for statistical analysis were two-sided and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 23 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).


We assessed 167 patients and interviewed 148 patients, of which 18 refused to participate and five met the exclusion criteria. Four of the remaining 125 consenting subjects were excluded (two where surgeries were rescheduled, and two where CPB was not used). Samples from 121 patients were analyzed (Fig. 1) (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient flow diagram. CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass

Table 2 Patient characteristics

The median [IQR] blood glucose values obtained by StatStrip and BGA and the median difference in blood values obtained by the two methods are shown in Table 3. The laboratory and hemodynamic data at five time-points are also shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Arterial blood analysis and hemodynamic parameter

The relationship between StatStrip and reference glucose values in the context of POCT12-A3 criteria are shown in Fig. 2. The number and percentage of the samples that met CLSI criteria 1 and 2 are shown in Table 4.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Scatter plot of the difference of glucose values (StatStrip® glucometer minus reference glucose) and reference glucose value. A = baseline; B = before CPB; C = early CPB; D = late CPB; E = post-CPB. Dashed lines represent CLSI POCT12-A3 error criteria 1: ± 0.66 mMol·L−1 of reference glucose value (for reference glucose values < 5.5 mMol·L−1) and ± 12.5% (reference glucose > 5.5 mMol·L−1) and criteria 2: 0.83 mMol·L−1 (reference glucose < 4.1 mMol·L−1) or 20% (reference glucose > 4.1 mMol·L−1). CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass CLSI POCT12-A3 = Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Point-of-Care testing 12-A3

Table 4 Blood glucose data meeting the criteria defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Point-of-Care testing 12-A3 guideline

The accuracy of the StatStrip glucose measurements at baseline and pre-CPB satisfied CLSI POCT12-A3 criteria while its accuracy during and post-CPB did not. The plotted Parkes error grid results are shown in Fig. 3. All samples at all time-points were within zones A and B (i.e., all samples met the ISO 15197:2013 clinical criteria).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Error grid analysis for arterial glucose obtained by StatStrip® and reference glucose values as shown by the Parkes error grid for type 1 diabetes mellitus. A = baseline; B = before CPB; C = early CPB; D = late CPB; E = post-CPB. To meet ISO 15197:2013 accuracy guidelines, 99% of values must fall within zone A or zone B. CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass; POC = point-of-care

Differences between the blood glucose values measured by the two methods correlated with the PaO2, lactate, hematocrit, ACT, and the norepinephrine infusion rate (Table 5). While heparinization was associated with a higher absolute difference (P < 0.001), blood transfusion was not (P = 0.45).

Table 5 Correlation between difference of glucose values obtained by the two methods and variables

Four variables (i.e., PaO2, lactate, hematocrit, and heparinization) were put into the logistic regression model considering the above results. For each 1% increase in hematocrit values, the odds ratio (OR) of meeting the CLSI POCT12-3A2013 criterion 1 increased by approximately 10% (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.14; P < 0.001), while heparinization was associated with less accuracy (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.43; P = 0.003). In contrast, PaO2 (OR, 1.27 for a 100 mmHg increase in PaO2; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.81; P = 0.19) and lactate (OR, 1.23 for each 1.0 mMol·L−1 lactate increase; 95% CI, 0.62 to 2.46; P = 0.54) did not significantly influence accuracy.

Analysis of the hematocrit ROC revealed a cut-off point of 31.5%. Thirty-five (15%) of the 239 samples with a hematocrit below 31.5% and only 14 (5%) of 305 samples with a hematocrit > 31.5% failed to satisfy CLSI POCT12-A3 accuracy criterion 1 (Fig. 4) (Table 6).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Receiver operating characteristic curves for hematocrit. The optimal cut-off value for predicting the inaccuracy of blood glucose value obtained by StatStrip® in hematocrit was 31.5%. (AUC = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.78; P < 0.001). AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval

Table 6 Estimated sensitivity and specificity for meeting to CLSI POCT criteria regarding hematocrit between 20 and 45

The Spearman correlation between blood glucose values was r = 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96 to 0.97; P < 0.001)


The results of this study show that arterial blood glucose analysis by the StatStrip glucometer during open-heart surgery does not meet CLSI POCT12-A3 accuracy criteria. Changes in the patients’ hematocrit and heparinization significantly influenced accuracy during and after CPB. In contrast, blood glucose measurements consistently met the ISO 15197:2013 criteria established for subcutaneous insulin therapy in diabetic patients.

Blood glucose measurements in the acute critical care setting performed by older point-of-care devices have to be interpreted with caution, mainly because they do not correct for hematocrit2,13,14 or other interferences such as BT,2 pH (2), PaO22,15 tissue perfusion,16 hypoglycemia,16,17 and various medications.2,14,16

For example, blood glucose analyses by Accu-check® (Roche Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) in surgical patients proved to be inaccurate according to the criteria developed for the safe use of subcutaneous insulin (ISO 15197:2013).6,18

Although the advent of newer technologies has provided more reliable results in the critically ill,19,20 no studies have addressed the limitations and accuracy of glucometers during operations that are associated with the most profound alterations of glucose homeostasis, such as cardiac procedures and CPB. Hence, not unexpectedly, there are no clear recommendations by the FDA regarding specific glucometer safety requirements for patients warranting intravenous insulin therapy perioperatively.

Recently, the use of StatStrip glucometer in patients undergoing a variety of non-cardiac surgical procedures showed 100% accuracy of capillary and arterial glucose values based on ISO15197:2013 criteria (i.e., all values were within zones A and B on the Parkes error grid for type-1 diabetes mellitus).10 Nevertheless, neither capillary nor arterial blood glucose results met the CLSI POCT12-A3 guidelines as required for intensive insulin protocols aimed at stricter glycemic control.10

These observations are in agreement with the present findings that the use of StatStrip glucometers is safe for the titration of subcutaneous insulin administration, but not for more intensive glycemic control during cardiac surgery and CPB.

A secondary objective of the present study was to detect clinical and laboratory variables that may contribute to glucometer bias. A previous study reported weak, although statistically significant, effects of comorbidity, PaCO2, and mean diastolic BP in the 15 min before sampling, while other parameters, including time of general anesthesia, diabetes status, biometrics, BT, HR, hematocrit, PaO2, and pH did not have any significant relationship.10

In the present study, heparinization and hematocrit showed a significant influence on StatStrip glucometer accuracy, particularly at hematocrit values below the cut-off point of 31.5%.

The heparin dose given in our protocol (400 IU·kg−1) typically leads to heparin plasma concentrations > 500 IU·dL−1,21 which according to the FDA22 can interfere with the hematocrit adjusting technology of glucometers. Although such interference should not occur with a hematocrit of 2060%,3 heparinization in our study was associated with significant bias during and after CPB.

The inaccuracy observed after separation from CPB and the administration of protamine suggests that even lower plasma heparin levels may have an impact.

The fact that more restrictive transfusion methods and lower levels of hemoglobin are becoming more acceptable during cardiac surgery23 further emphasizes the importance of accurate point-of-care blood glucose measurements in anemic patients.

We acknowledge several limitations. We only studied adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery making the applicability of our findings to pediatric settings uncertain. Secondly, as no episode of hypoglycemia (< 3.5 mMol·L−1) was recorded in our study subjects, our observations may not be applied to blood glucose values in the hypoglycemic range. Thirdly, only a few ACT values between 200 and 400 sec were analyzed (CPB requires > 480 sec). Hence, the influence of lower concentrations of heparin needs further study. Fourthly, because we tested only one glucometer model, our results are not generalizable to others. Finally, it is not possible to fully predict whether a sample size of 100 is adequate to evaluate the accuracy of a glucometer under the CLSI POCT12-A3 guidelines assuming a Spearman correlation r > 0.95. Hence, a larger sample size may be required.4

In conclusion, arterial blood glucose measurement by StatStrip was accurate before CPB but was no longer accurate during and after CPB, most likely due to the impact of heparinization and anemia. Values obtained using the StatStrip must be interpreted with caution during intensive glucose control in cardiac surgery.


  1. Thiessen S, Vanhorebeek I, Van den Berghe G. Glycemic control and outcome related to cardiopulmonary bypass. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2015; 29: 177-87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rice MJ, Pitkin AD, Coursin DB. Review article: glucose measurement in the operating room: more complicated than it seems. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 1056-65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. nova biomedical. StatStrip® GLU Nova Hospital Glucose Monitoring System. Available from URL; (accessed February 2019).

  4. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Testing in Acute and Chronic Care Facilities; Approved Guideline - Third Edition; 2013.

  5. Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg BH. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 1143-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. In vitro diagnostic test systems – Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus, 2nd edition. International Organization for Standardization; 2013.

  7. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Intraoperative Nasal Insulin Effect on Plasma and CSF Insulin Concentration and Blood Glucose. Available from URL: February 2019)

  8. Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41: 734-44; discussion 744-5.

  9. Dobson G. Special announcement: Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia - revised edition 2018. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 1-6.

  10. Karon BS, Donato LJ, Larsen CM, et al. Accuracy of capillary and arterial whole blood glucose measurements using a glucose meter in patients under general anesthesia in the operating room. Anesthesiology 2017; 127: 466-74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Inoue S, Egi M, Kotani J, Morita K. Accuracy of blood-glucose measurements using glucose meters and arterial blood gas analyzers in critically ill adult patients: systematic review. Crit Care 2013; 17: R48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Steinfelder-Visscher J, Weerwind PW, Teerenstra S, Brouwer MH. Reliability of point-of-care hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 2006; 21: 33-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghys T, Goedhuys W, Spincemaille K, Gorus F, Gerlo E. Plasma-equivalent glucose at the point-of-care: evaluation of Roche Accu-Chek Inform and Abbott Precision PCx glucose meters. Clin Chim Acta 2007; 386: 63-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karon BS, Griesmann L, Scott R, et al. Evaluation of the impact of hematocrit and other interference on the accuracy of hospital-based glucose meters. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008; 10: 111-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang Z, Louie RF, Lee JH, Lee DM, Miller EE, Kost GJ. Oxygen effects on glucose meter measurements with glucose dehydrogenase- and oxidase-based test strips for point-of-care testing. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1062-70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pulzi Junior SA, Assuncao MS, Mazza BF, et al. Accuracy of different methods for blood glucose measurement in critically ill patients. Sao Paulo Med J 2009; 127: 259-65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanji S, Buffie J, Hutton B, et al. Reliability of point-of-care testing for glucose measurement in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2778-85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mraovic B, Schwenk ES, Epstein RH. Intraoperative accuracy of a point-of-care glucose meter compared with simultaneous central laboratory measurements. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012; 6: 541-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Karon BS, Blanshan CT, Deobald GR, Wockenfus AM. Retrospective evaluation of the accuracy of Roche AccuChek Inform and Nova StatStrip glucose meters when used on critically ill patients. Diabetes Technol Ther 2014; 16: 828-32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitsios JV, Ashby LA, Haverstick DM, Bruns DE, Scott MG. Analytic evaluation of a new glucose meter system in 15 different critical care settings. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013; 7: 1282-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Murray DJ, Brosnahan WJ, Pennell B, Kapalanski D, Weiler JM, Olson J. Heparin detection by the activated coagulation time: a comparison of the sensitivity of coagulation tests and heparin assays. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997; 11: 24-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Blood Glucose Monitoring Test Systems for Prescription Point-of-Care Use - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff, October 2016; Issued January 2014. Available from URL: (accessed February 2019).

  23. Mazer CD, Whitlock RP, Fergusson DA, et al. Six-month outcomes after restrictive or liberal transfusion for cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 1224-33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial interests that may be relevant to the submitted work.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Hilary P. Grocott, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.

Author contributions

Yosuke Nakadate contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, and drafting the article. Hiroaki Sato contributed to conception and design of the study, and analysis and interpretation of data. Patricia Roque contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, and drafting the article. Tamaki Sato contributed to conception and design of the study, and the acquisition and interpretation of data. Takashi Matsukawa contributed to the interpretation of the data and drafting the article. Linda Wykes contributed to conception and design of the study and the interpretation of data. Akiko Kawakami contributed the interpretation of the data and drafting the article. Thomas Schricker contributed to conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the article.

Funding sources

The study was supported by a departmental fund (account number 65788) and a salary grant from the Yamanashi Prefecture (to Y. N).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosuke Nakadate MD, PhD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakadate, Y., Sato, H., Roque, P. et al. Accuracy of blood glucose measurements using the NOVA StatStrip® glucometer during cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth 66, 943–952 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: