Advertisement

Procedural sedation: a position paper of the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society

  • Gregory DobsonEmail author
  • Matthew A. Chong
  • Lorraine Chow
  • Alana Flexman
  • Heather Hurdle
  • Matthew Kurrek
  • Claude Laflamme
  • Michel-Antoine Perrault
  • Kathryn Sparrow
  • Shean Stacey
  • Petrus A. Swart
  • Michael Wong
Special Article

The Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society (CAS) promotes safe anesthesia care to the highest possible standard. Traditionally, this care was provided in operating rooms by anesthesiologists. Contemporary practice, however, includes many other care locations and providers. Nevertheless, requirements for assessing the patient and managing the medical intervention are independent of provider or location.

Procedural sedation is defined as the technique of safely administering short-acting sedative or dissociative agents, with or without analgesics, to reduce discomfort, apprehension, and potentially unpleasant memories while minimizing cardiorespiratory depression of patients during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. These effects are distinct from both general anesthesia, which provides a state of total unconsciousness, and analgesia alone, which delivers a reduction in or insensibility to pain, not necessarily with a reduction in or a loss of consciousness. Some use of analgesic...

Sédation procédurale : exposé de principe de la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes

Notes

Acknowledgements

Contributions to the earlier version of this position paper from former members of the CAS Committee on Standards to the Practice of Anesthesia are gratefully acknowledged.

Competing interests

All authors of this article are members of the Standards Committee of the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society (CAS). None of the authors have any financial or commercial interests relating to any companies or manufacturers of equipment or medications referenced in this article. Dr. Gregory Dobson is the Chair of the Committee on Standards of the CAS.

Editorial responsibility

This submission was handled by Dr. Hilary P. Grocott, Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.

Remerciements

Les auteurs sont très reconnaissants envers les anciens membres du Comité des normes de l’exercice de l’anesthésie de la SCA pour leurs contributions à la version précédente de cet exposé de principe.

Conflits d’intérêts

Tous les auteurs de cet article sont membres du Comité des normes de la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes (SCA). Aucun auteur n’a de lien financier ou commercial avec les sociétés pharmaceutiques ou fabricants d’équipements mentionnés dans cet article. Le Dr Gregory Dobson est le président du Comité des normes de la SCA.

Responsabilité édiroriale

Cet article a été traité par le Dr Hilary P. Grocott, Rédacteur en chef, Journal canadien d’anesthésie.

References

  1. 1.
    Metzner J, Domino KB. Risks of anesthesia or sedation outside the operating room: the role of the anesthesia care provider. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010; 23: 523-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Metzner J, Posner KL, Domino KB. The risk and safety of anesthesia at remote locations: the US closed claims analysis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22: 502-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Canadian Medical Protective Association. Medical-legal issues involving the use of procedural sedation. Safe Medical Care: Medical Care Analytics; 2018 .Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newton M, Blightman K. Guidance for the Provision of Anaesthesia Services (GPAS). Guidance on the Provision of Sedation Services 2016; Chapter 19. Available from URL: https://www.rcoa.ac.uk/system/files/GPAS-2016-19-SEDATION.pdf (accessed July 2018).
  5. 5.
    Antonelli MT, Seaver D, Urman RD. Procedural sedation and implications for quality and risk management. J Healthc Risk Manag 2013; 33: 3-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis CL. Does your facility have a pediatric sedation team? If not, why not? Pediatr Nurs 2008; 34: 308-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andropoulos DB. Sedation scales and discharge criteria. How do they differ? Which one to choose? Do they really apply to sedation? In: Mason KP, editor. Pediatric Sedation Outside of the Operating Room: A multispecialty international collaboration – Second Edition. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 71-2.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Nagappa M, Liao P, Wong J, et al. Validation of the STOP-Bang questionnaire as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea among different populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0143697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jirapinyo P, Thompson CC. Sedation challenges: obesity and sleep apnea. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2016; 26: 527-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dobson G, Chong M, Chow L, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia - revised edition 2018. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 76-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patel S, Vargo JJ, Khandwala F, et al. Deep sedation occurs frequently during elective endoscopy with meperidine and midazolam. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2689-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blayney MR. Procedural sedation for adult patients: an overview. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain 2012; 12: 176-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saunders R, Struys MM, Pollock RF, Mestek M, Lightdale JR. Patient safety during procedural sedation using capnography monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e013402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Propofol sedation: who should administer?. Newsletter November: Acute Care - ISMP Medication Safety Alert; 2005 .Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Society of Anesthesiologists. Statement on safe use of propofol. Committee on ambulatory surgical care, House of Delegates, amended 2014. Available from URL: http://www.asahq.org/quality-and-practice-management/standards-guidelines-and-related-resources/statement-on-safe-use-of-propofol (accessed July 2018).
  17. 17.
    Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 89-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chung F, Chan VW, Ong D. A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 500-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Dobson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthew A. Chong
    • 2
  • Lorraine Chow
    • 3
  • Alana Flexman
    • 4
  • Heather Hurdle
    • 3
  • Matthew Kurrek
    • 5
  • Claude Laflamme
    • 6
  • Michel-Antoine Perrault
    • 7
  • Kathryn Sparrow
    • 8
  • Shean Stacey
    • 3
  • Petrus A. Swart
    • 4
  • Michael Wong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  3. 3.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  4. 4.Department of AnesthesiologyVancouver General HospitalVancouverCanada
  5. 5.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Department of AnesthesiologySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoCanada
  7. 7.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada
  8. 8.Department of AnesthesiologyMemorial UniversitySt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations