Skip to main content
Log in

Defect Detection Using Unanimous Vote Among Mahalanobis Classifiers for Each Color Component

  • Article
  • Published:
The Review of Socionetwork Strategies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In manufacturing industries, product inspection is automated and the use of image data is increasingly being employed for defect detection. A manufacturing company in Japan produces an item and inspects the produced products using image data. Reducing the error rate is important in product inspection because poor inspection of products might lead to the delivery of defective products to consumers (consumer’s risk) and strict inspection increases production cost (producer’s risk). To reduce the error rate, we highlighted fault points using a two-dimensional moving range filter and discriminated defect production through a unanimous vote among Mahalanobis classifiers for each color component. For results, we achieved a lower error rate than the current system. This research is an empirical study of how to use image data in defect detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arun, M., Prathipa, R., & Krishna, P. S. G. (2014). Automatic defect detection of steel products using supervised classifier. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 2(3), 3630–3635.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar, A. (2003). Neural network based detection of local textile defects. Pattern Recognition, 36(7), 1645–1659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, A. (2008). Computer-vision-based fabric defect detection: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(1), 348–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, X., Tso, S. K., Guan, X.-P., & Huang, Q. (2006). Improving automatic detection of defects in castings by applying wavelet technique. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 53(6), 1927–1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahaman, G. M., & Hossain, M. M. (2009). Automatic defect detection and classification technique from image: A special case using ceramic tiles. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 1(1), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Werman, M., & Peleg, S. (1985). Min-max operators in texture analysis. IEEE PAMI, 7(6), 730–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, J. S. J., Haralick, R. M., & Shapiro, L. G. (1987). Morphologic edge detection. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, RA-3(2), 142–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Verbeek, P. W., Vrooman, H. A., & Van Vliet, L. J. (1988). Low-level image processing by max-min filters. Signal Processing, 15(3), 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natsuki Sano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sano, N., Mori, Y. & Suzuki, T. Defect Detection Using Unanimous Vote Among Mahalanobis Classifiers for Each Color Component. Rev Socionetwork Strat 11, 173–183 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-017-0015-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-017-0015-0

Keywords

Navigation