Skip to main content
Log in

Bruxismus und Zahnersatz

  • CME Zahnärztliche Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Freie Zahnarzt Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Bruxismus ist in der Bevölkerung recht weit verbreitet und kann durchaus negative Auswirkungen auf den Langzeiterfolg prothetischer (implantatprothetischer) Restaurationen haben. Daher empfiehlt sich bei der umfangreichen prothetischen Versorgung von Patienten mit keramischen Verbundrestaurationen die Etablierung eines geeigneten Bruxismusscreenings. Hierbei nehmen elektronische Messverfahren zunehmenden Stellenwert ein. Anschließend können dann sowohl die geeignete Therapieform als auch das geeignete Material bzw. die geeignete Materialkombination individuell ausgewählt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7

Literatur

  1. Kato T, Velly AM, Nakane T et al (2011) Age is associated with self-reported sleep bruxism, independently of tooth loss. Sleep Breath. DOI: 10.1007/s11325-011-0625-7

  2. Mainieri VC, Saueressig AC, Pattussi MP et al (2012) Validation of the Bitestrip versus polysomnography in the diagnosis of patients with a clinical history of sleep bruxism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 113:612–617

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pierce CJ, Gale EN (1989) Methodological considerations concerning the use of Bruxcore Plates to evaluate nocturnal bruxism. J Dent Res 68:1110–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marchack BW, Sato S, Marchack CB, White SN (2011) Complete and partial contour zirconia designs for crowns and fixed dental prostheses: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 106:145–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosentritt M, Steiger D, Behr M et al (2009) Influence of substructure design and spacer settings on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns. J Dent 37:978–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rues S, Kroeger E, Mueller D, Schmitter M (2010) Effect of firing protocols on cohesive failure of all-ceramic crowns. J Dent 38:987–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmitter M, Mueller D, Rues S (2012) Chipping behaviour of all-ceramic crowns with zirconia framework and CAD/CAM manufactured veneer. J Dent 40:154–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Schmutz F et al (2012) Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists. Acta Odontol Scand. DOI 10.3109/00016357.2011.654248

  9. Preis V, Behr M, Handel G et al (2012) Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 10:13–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Zavanelli RA et al (2010) Reliability of metalloceramic and zirconia-based ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 89:1051–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Proschel P, Morneburg T, Hugger A et al (2002) Articulator-related registration – a simple concept for minimizing eccentric occlusal errors in the articulator. Int J Prosthodont 15:289–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yilmaz K, Ozkan P (2010) The methods for the generation of smoothness in dental ceramics. Compend Contin Educ Dent 31:30–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Isgro G, Pallav P, Zel JM van der, Feilzer AJ (2003) The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 90:465–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M (2010) Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 37:641–652

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Klineberg IJ, Trulsson M, Murray GM (2012) Occlusion on implants – is there a problem? J Oral Rehabil 39:522–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manfredini D, Bucci MB, Sabattini VB, Lobbezoo F (2011) Bruxism: overview of current knowledge and suggestions for dental implants planning. Cranio 29:304–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Schmitter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmitter, M. Bruxismus und Zahnersatz. DFZ 57, 47–53 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12614-012-1489-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12614-012-1489-3

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation