Skip to main content
Log in

Portage de repas à domicile : quel rôle et quelle efficacité ?

Home-delivered “Meals on Wheels”: role and effectiveness

  • Mise au Point / Update
  • Published:
Les cahiers de l'année gérontologique

Résumé

Les portages de repas à domicile sont de plus en plus utilisés par les personnes âgées. Ce sont surtout des personnes seules ou de vieux couples qui s’en servent, très souvent parce qu’ils ont des difficultés à faire leurs courses ou à cuisiner (50 %), plus rarement au décours d’une hospitalisation (un tiers des cas). Elles utilisent ce service parfois sur plusieurs années. Elles reçoivent presque toujours un repas par jour, souvent avec une soupe en plus pour le repas du soir. Si les clients sont globalement satisfaits du service, ils expriment de nombreuses critiques: plats pas toujours adaptés à leurs goûts, manque de choix, difficultés à changer un plat, certains produits trop durs (viande, légumes), peu de contact avec les livreurs, prix parfois trop chers…Ces repas ne sont pas toujours consommés en entier et servent souvent aussi pour le repas du soir. Si l’on connaît le vécu des bénéficiaires, on ignore l’apport de ces repas en termes d’énergie ou de nutriments. En effet, très peu d’enquêtes sur ces services ont été conduites, tant en France qu’ailleurs. Ainsi, l’utilité de ces services en termes de prévention de la dénutrition chez les patients à risque est aujourd’hui inconnue. De même, le faible temps consacré à la livraison fait que ces services ne peuvent pas être aujourd’hui utilisés comme facteur de surveillance (donc de prévention) d’une éventuelle dégradation de l’état de santé au domicile. Il devient donc important qu’une réglementation concernant ces services puisse être élaborée pour s’assurer de leur utilité sur la préservation des états nutritionnels et de santé au domicile.

Abstract

Meals on Wheels are increasingly used by home-living elderly people. Users are mostly lonely people and old couples. They are using it generally for shopping and/or cooking difficulties (50%), less frequently after an hospitalization period (1/3), sometimes for years. Usually the service offers one meal a day, often with an extra soup for dinner. Customers estimate the offer as good even though they express numerous criticisms: dishes not in relation to their own tastes, little choices and problems to obtain dish changes, too though dish (meat and vegetable), few contacts with delivering persons and too high costs. They do not always eat all served meals at lunch, using part of it for dinner. User’s opinions have been inquired, in contrast, energy and nutrient served are unknown, since few studies have been conducted in France and elsewhere. Undernutrition prevention in at-risk individuals remains to be evaluated. In addition, usefulness of such services for health status slow deterioration prevention has still to be proved since delivering persons do not have time to do it. In consequences, it may be urgent that specific rules are taken in order those services take part in prevention for home living elderly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Moreiras O, van Staveren WA, Amorin Cruz JA, et al (1991) Intake of energy and nutrients. Euronut SENECA investigators. Eur J Clin Nutr 45(suppl 3):105–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moreiras O, van Staveren WA, Amorin Cruz JA, et al (1996) Longitudinal changes in the intake of energy and macronutrients of elderly Europeans. SENECA Investigators Eur J Clin Nutr 50(Suppl 2):S67–S76

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dirren H, Decarli B, Lesourd B, et al (1991) Nutritional status: haematology and albumin. Eur J Clin Nutr 45(Suppl 3):43–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lesourd B, Decarli B, Dirren H (1996) Longitudinal changes in iron and protein status of elderly Europeans. Eur J Clin Nutr 50(Suppl 2):S16–S24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stratégie de prise en charge en cas de dénutrition protéinoénergétique chez la personne âgée. Recommandations professionnelles. Haute Autorité de santé. Avril 2007 www.has-sante.fr

  6. Woo J, Ho SC, Sam A (2001) Longitudinal changes in body mass index and body composition over 3 years and relationships to health outcomes in Hong Kong Chinese age 70 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:737–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Payette H, Coulombe C, Boutier V, Gray-Donald K (2000) Nutritional risk factors for institutionalization in a free-living functionally dependent elderly population. J Clin Epidemiol 53:579–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. White JV (1991) Risk factors for poor nutritional status in older Americans. Am Fam Physican 44:2087–2097

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shatenstein B, Kergoat MJ, Nadon S (2001) Weight change, nutritional risk and its determinants among cognitively intact and demented elderly Canadians. Can J Public Health 92:143–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Drewnowski A, Schultz JM (2001) Impact of aging on eating behaviors, food choices, nutrition and health status. J Nutr Health Aging 5:75–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferry M, Alix E, Brocker P, Constans T (2012) Causes des dénutritions. In: Ferry M, Mischlich D, Alix E, et al (eds) Nutrition de la personne âgée. Aspects fondamentaux, cliniques et psychosociaux. Elsevier Masson, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, pp 145–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharkey JR, Branch LG, Zohhori N (2002) Inadequate nutrient intakes among homebound elderly and their correlates with individual characteristics and health related factors. Am J Clin Nutr 76:1135–1145

    Google Scholar 

  13. Margretts BM, Thompson RI, Elia M, Jackson AA (2003) Prevalence of risk of undernutrition is associated with poor health status on older people in the UK. Eur J Clin Nutr 57:69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Odlund-Olin A, Koochek A, Ljungqvist O, Cederholm T (2005) Nutritional status, well-being and functional ability in frail elderly service for residents? Eur J Clin Nutr 59:263–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Soini H, Routasalo P, Lauri S (2006) Nutrition in patients receiving home care in Findland: tackling the multifactorial problem. J Gerontol Nurs 32:12–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharkey JR, Branch LG, Giulani C, et al (2004) Nutrients intakes and BMI as predictors of severity of ADL disability over 1 year in homebound elders. J Nutr Health Ageing 8:131–139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. American Academy of Family Physicians, American Dietetic Association, National Council of Aging (1991) Nutrition screening manual for professionals caring for older Americans. Washington DC: National Screening Initiative

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hybels CF, Blazer DG, Pieper CF (2001) Toward a threshold for subthreshold depression: an analysis of correlates of depression by severity of symptoms using data from an elderly community sample. Gerontologist 41:357–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Park JK, Son SM (2003) The dietary behaviors, depression rates and nutrient intakes of the elderly female living alone Korea, J Community Nutr 8:716–725

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vailas LI, Nitzke SA, Becker M, Gast J (1998) Risk indicators for malnutrition are associated inversely with quality of life for participants in meal programs for older adults. J Am Diet Assoc 98:548–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Amarantos E, Martinez A, Dwyer J (2001) Nutrition and quality of life in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(Spec no 2):54–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barr JT, Schumacher GE (2003) The need for a nutrition-related quality-of-life measure. J Am Diet Assoc 103:177–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Raynaud-Simon A (2008) Dénutrition de la personne âgée: épidémiologie et conséquences. In: Hébuterne X, Alix E, Raynaud-Simon A, Vellas B (eds) Traité de nutrition de la personne âgée. Springer-SFNEP 165–174

    Google Scholar 

  24. US Bureau of Census (2000) Annual estimates of the resident population by selected ages groups for the United States and states: July 1, 2003 and April 1. www.census.gov/popest/states/tables/ST-EST2003-01res.xls

    Google Scholar 

  25. Keller HH (2006) Meals programs improve nutritional risk: a longitudinal analysis of community-living seniors. J Am Diet Assoc 106:1042–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharkey JR (2003) Risk and presence of food insufficiency are associated with low nutrient intakes and multimorbidity among Homebound older women who receive Home-delivered meals. J Nutr 133:3485–3491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Moran MB (2004) Challenges in the Meals On Wheels program. J Am Diet Assoc 104:1219–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Almanza BA, Namkung Y, Ismail JA, Nelson DC (2007) Clients’ safe food-handling knowledge and risk behavior in a homedelivered meal program. J Am Diet Assoc 107:816–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Joung HW, Kim HS, Yuan JJ, Huffman L (2011) Service quality, satisfaction, and behavioral intention in home-delivered meals program. Nutr Res Pract 5:163–168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Maleysson F, Huc ML (2008) Portage de repas: c’est pas bombance. Que choisir 40–43

    Google Scholar 

  31. Association Consommation Logement Cadre et Vie. Enquête sur l’alimentation des personnes âgées (auprès de résidents en maisons de retraite et de clients de services de portage de repas). Dossier de presse 02/02/2012 www.clcv.org/Enquete-sur-l-alimentation-des-pa.cp02022012.0.html

  32. Lesourd B, Gravière C, Ollier ML, et al (2012) Les portages de repas à domicile: enquête sur tout un département. Rev Geriatr 37:575–585

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cabanes H (2013) Portage de repas à domicile pour les personnes âgées. Repas livrés = repas consommés ? Mémoire de DIU de nutrition de la personne âgée. Faculté de Clermont-Ferrand, 32 pages

    Google Scholar 

  34. Committee on Education and Labor of the United States House of Representatives (1963) Compilation of the Older Americans Act of 1965 and the Native American Programs Act of 1974 as amended through December 31, 1992. Title III-C, sec. 336. US government printing office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fogler-Livitt E, Lau D, Csima A, et al (1995) Utilization of home-delivered meals by recipients 75 years of age and older. J Am Diet Assoc 95:552–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parsons K, Rolls C (2004) Assessing the need for hot meals: a descriptive “Meals on Wheels” study. Can J Diet Pract Res 65:90–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Dwyer C, Corish CA, Timonen V (2009) Nutritional stats of Irish older people in receipt of meals-on-wheels and the nutritional content of meals provided. H Hum Nutr Diet 22:521–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kretser AJ, Voss T, Kerr WW, et al (2003) Effects of two models of nutritional intervention on homebound elder adults at nutritional risk. J Am Diet Assoc 103:329–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gollub EA, Weddle DO (2004) Improvements in nutritional intake and quality of life among frail homebound older adults receiving home-delivered breakfast and lunch. J Am Diet Assoc 104:1227–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Frongillo EA, Cantor MH, McMillan T, et al (2010) Who are the recipients of Meals-on-Wheels in the New York City? A profile of based on a representative sample on Meals-on-Wheels recipient. Care Manag J 11:19–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Krondl M, Lau D, Coleman P, Stocker G (2003) Tailoring of nutritional support for older adults in the community. J Nutr Elderly 23:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ferry M, Sidobre B, Lambertin A, Barberger-Gateau P (2005) The SOLINUT: analysis of the interaction between nutrition and loneliness in persons over 70 years. J Nutr Health Aging 9:261–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Choi NG (1999) Determinants of frail elder’s lengths of stay in meals on wheels. Gerontologist 39:397–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Charlton KE, Walton K, Moon L, et al (2013) “It could probably help someone bur not me”: a feasibility study of a snack programme offered to meals on wheels clients. J Nutr Health Aging 17:364–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lirette T, Podovennikoff J, Wisner W, et al (2008) Food preference and meal satisfaction of Meals On Wheels recipients. Can J Diet Pract Res 68:214–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Roy MA, Payette H (2006) Meals-On-Wheels improves energy and nutrient intakes in a frail-living elderly population. J Nutr Health Aging 10:554–560

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Silver HJ, Dietrich MS, Castellanos VH (2008) Increased energy density of the home-delivered lunch meal improve 24-hour nutrient intakes in older adults. J Am Diet Assoc 108:2084–2089

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Timonen V, O’Dwyer C (2010) “It is nice to see someone coming in”: exploring the social objectives of Meals-on-Wheels. Can J Aging 29:399–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Donini LM, Savina C, Cannella C (2003) Eating habits and appetite control in the elderly: the anorexia of aging. Int Psychogeriatr 15:73–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 64:12–37

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lee SM, Joo N (2012) A study on the model of homebound senior’s meal satisfaction related to the quality of life. Nutr Res Pract 64:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Lesourd.

About this article

Cite this article

Lesourd, B., Dadet, S. Portage de repas à domicile : quel rôle et quelle efficacité ?. cah. année gerontol. 5, 318–325 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12612-013-0364-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12612-013-0364-4

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation