Skip to main content
Log in

Aspects épidémiologiques des fractures ostéoporotiques

Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures

  • Article de Synthèse / Review Article
  • Published:
Les cahiers de l'année gérontologique

Résumé

Les fractures du col fémoral, des vertèbres et du poignet sont traditionnellement rapportées à l’ostéoporose, mais la plupart des fractures qui surviennent chez les femmes de plus de 60 ans sont liées à une densité minérale osseuse (DMO) abaissée et peuvent donc être considérées comme des fractures ostéoporotiques. En l’absence de mesures de prévention efficaces, des estimations américaines indiquent que 40 femmes de 50 ans sur 100 souffriront d’au moins d’une fracture ostéoporotique majeure (col fémoral, vertèbre, poignet) avant la fin de leur vie. En France, le nombre annuel de fractures du col du fémur, estimé à environ 50 000 en 1990, devrait tripler d’ici 2050. Les personnes qui ont souffert d’une première fracture ont deux fois plus de risque de souffrir d’une nouvelle fracture. Du fait de leur fréquence, de leur impact sur la santé et de leur coût pour la société, les fractures ostéoporotiques sont désormais reconnues comme un enjeu important de santé publique. Le déterminisme des fractures est multifactoriel, et des outils cliniques combinant mesure de la DMO et facteurs de risque cliniques ont été développés pour identifier les personnes à risque susceptibles de bénéficier d’un traitement de l’ostéoporose préventif des fractures. La majorité des fractures sont la conséquence d’une chute et les facteurs connus de chute et de traumatisme augmentent le risque de fracture, notamment du col fémoral, indépendamment du niveau de DMO. Les recherches sur la prévention des chutes chez les personnes âgées pourraient ouvrir de nouvelles pistes pour diminuer de façon significative le nombre de fractures à l’échelle de la population.

Abstract

Fractures of the hip, vertebral body, and distal forearm have long been regarded as the typical osteoporotic fractures. But most fractures occurring in women aged 60 and over have an increased incidence in women with low bone mineral density and can therefore be considered as a manifestation of osteoporosis. It has been estimated that the remaining lifetime risk of a major osteoporotic fracture (hip, vertebrae, forearm) is 40% for American white women. In France, the annual number of hip fracture, estimated around 50,000 in 1990, is expected to triple by 2050. The risk of fracture is two times higher in subjects who already suffered a fracture. Given their frequency, health impact and societal cost, osteoporotic fractures are largely recognized as a major public health problem. The etiology of fractures is multifactorial, and clinical tools combining bone mineral density and clinical factors have been developed to better identify subjects at high-risk who may benefit from an osteoporosis treatment preventive of fractures. The majority of fractures are a consequence of a fall, and known risk factors for falls and trauma have been shown to increase the risk of fracture, in particular of the femoral neck, independently of bone mineral density. Research on falls prevention in the elderly may open new perspectives to significantly reduce the number of fractures in the population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis WHO technical report series, no 843. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, et al (2002) A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 13:527–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dargent-Molina P, Benhamou CL, Cortet B, et al (2007) Devising global strategies for fracture-risk evaluation. Joint Bone Spine 74:240–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, et al (2009) FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui LY, et al (2003) BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18: 1947–1954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, et al (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 34:195–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seeley DG, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, et al (1991) Which fractures are associated with low appendicular bone mass in elderly women? The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Ann Intern Med 115:837–842

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dargent-Molina P, Favier F, Grandjean H, et al (1996) Fallrelated factors and risk of hip fracture: the EPIDOS Prospective Study. Lancet 348:145–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baudoin C, Fardellone P, Thelot B, et al (1996) Hip fractures in France: the magnitude and perspective of the problem. Osteoporos Int 6(Suppl 3):S1–S10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnell O, Gullberg B, Allander E, Kanis JA (1992) The apparent incidence of hip fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources. Osteoporos Int 2:298–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobsen SJ, Goldberg J, Miles TP, et al (1990) Regional variation in the incidence of hip fracture. US white women aged 65 years and older. JAMA 264:500–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Ugoni AM, et al (2002) Fracture rates lower in rural than urban communities: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:466–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gardsell P, Johnell O, Nilsson BE, Sernbo I (1991) Bone mass in an urban and a rural population: a comparative, population-based study in southern Sweden. J Bone Miner Res 6:67–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper C (1999) The epidemiology of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 10:S2–S8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, et al (1996) The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1010–1018

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. The European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) Group (2002) Incidence of vertebral fracture in Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 17:716–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, et al (1993) Populationbased study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 137:1001–1005

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 7:221–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobsen SJ, Cooper C, Gottlieb MS, et al (1992) Hospitalization with vertebral fracture among the aged: a national populationbased study, 1986–1989. Epidemiology 3:515–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Inserm (1996) Ostéoporose. Stratégies de prévention et de traitement. In: Inserm (ed) Expertise Collective Inserm, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O’Dowd KJ (1985) Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev 7:178–208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Cooper C (2001) Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29: 517–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC (1989) An hypothesis: the causes of hip fractures. J Gerontol 44:M107–M11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Melton LJ 3rd, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, et al (1992) Perspective. Howmanywomen have osteoporosis? JBoneMinerRes 7:1005–1010

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cooper C (1997) The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. Am J Med 103:12S–19S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grady D, Rubin SM, Petitti DB, et al (1992) Hormone therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 117:1016–1037

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nevitt MC, Ross PD, Palermo L, et al (1999) Association of prevalent vertebral fractures, bone density and alendronate treatment with incident vertebral fractures: effect of number and spinal location of fractures. The Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Bone 25:613–619

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1991) Preexisting fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 114:919–923

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Baudoin C, Fardellone P, Potard V, Sebert JL(1993) Fractures of the proximal femur in Picardy, France, in 1987. Osteoporos Int 3:43–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Osteoporosis I: epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Baudoin C, Fardellone P, Bean K, et al (1996) Clinical outcomes and mortality after hip fracture: a 2-year follow-up study. Bone 18:149S–157S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Magaziner J, Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, et al (1989) Survival experience of aged hip fracture patients.AmJ Public Health 79:274–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Magaziner J, Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, et al (1990) Predictors of functional recovery one-year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: a prospective study. J Gerontol 45:M101–M7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Melton LJ (2000) Excess mortality following vertebral fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:338–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Johnell O, Gullberg B, Kanis JA (1997) The hospital burden of vertebral fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources. Osteoporos Int 7:138–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ismail AA, Cooper C, Felsenberg D, et al (1999) Number and type of vertebral deformities: epidemiological characteristics and relation to back pain and height loss. Osteoporos Int 9: 206–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ettinger B, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al (1992) Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. J Bone Miner Res 7:449–456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hall SE, Criddle RA, Comito TL, Prince RL (1999) A casecontrol study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 9:508–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Pluijm SMF, Tromp AM, Smit JH, et al (2000) Consequences of vertebral deformities in older men and women. J Bone Miner Res 15:1564–1572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1994) Pain and disability associated with new vertebral fractures and other spinal conditions. J Clin Epidemiol 47:231–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bickerstaff DR, Kanis JA (1994) Algodystrophy: an underrecognized complication of minor trauma. Br J Rheumatol 33:240–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kaukonen JP, Karaharju EO, Porras M, et al (1988) Functional recovery after fractures of the distal forearm. Analysis of radiographic and other factors affecting the outcome. Ann Chir Gynaecol 77:27–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rapport sur l’ostéoporose dans la Communauté européenne (1999) Actions de prévention. In: European C (ed) Communautés européennes, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a worldwide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gehlbach SH, Avrunin JS, Puleo E (2007) Trends in hospital care for hip fractures. Osteoporos Int 18:585–591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Dargent-Molina.

About this article

Cite this article

Dargent-Molina, P. Aspects épidémiologiques des fractures ostéoporotiques. cah. année gerontol. 1, 164–171 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12612-009-0026-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12612-009-0026-8

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation