Skip to main content
Log in

Génitoplasties féminisantes

Feminizing genitoplasty

  • Mise au Point / Update
  • Published:
Revue de médecine périnatale

Résumé

La complexité et la diversité des pathologies pouvant amener à proposer une génitoplastie féminisante demandent que ces enfants soient pris en charge dès la naissance par des équipes multidisciplinaires expérimentées. Un débat existe concernant les indications, le timing et le type de génitoplastie. Nous passons en revue les principales pathologies concernées et nous décrivons les principes des interventions actuelles. Nous rapportons également les résultats postopératoires de cette chirurgie.

Abstract

The complexity and diversity of pathologies in a feminizing genitoplasty, require a multidisciplinary management by an experienced team. There is an ongoing debate about the indications, timing, and type of feminizing genitoplasty in DSD patients. This article describes the various types of DSD patients, and also the current techniques and outcomes of feminizing surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

DSD:

disorders of sex development

OGE:

organes génitaux externes

OGI:

organes génitaux internes

HCS:

hyperplasie congénitale de surrénale

AIS:

insensibilité aux androgènes (CAIS = complète, PAIS = partielle)

DGM:

dysgénésie gonadique mixte

AMH:

hormone antimüllérien

Références

  1. Hughes A, Houk C, Ahmed SF, et al (2006) Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. J Pediatr Urol 2:148–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorduza DB, Gay CL, Mouriquand P (2012) Disorders of sex development majeurs. In: Urgences chirurgicales de l’enfant. Doin Editeurs Wolters Kluwer, France, chapitre 38, pp 282–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vidal I, Gorduza DB, Haraux E, et al (2010) Surgical options in disorder of sex development (DSD) with ambiguous genitalia. Clin Endocrinol Metab 24:311–25

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prader A (1954) Genital findings in the female pseudohermaphroditism of the congenital adrenogenital syndrome; morphology, frequency, development and heredity of the different genital forms. Helvetica Pediatrica Acta 9:231–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorduza DB, Vidal I, Birraux J, et al (2010) The surgical challenges of disorders of sex development (DSD) Arch Esp Urol 63:495–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mure PY, Gelas T, Ripepi M, et al (2003) Surgical management of congenital adrenal hyperplasia in young girls. Progr Urol 13:1381–91

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fortunoff S, Lattimer JK, Edson M (1964) Vaginoplasty technique for female pseudohermaphrodites. Surg Gynecol Obstet 118:545–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pena A (1997) Total urogenital mobilization–an easier way to repair cloacas. J Pediatr Surg 32:263–7; discussion 267–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rink RC, Metcalfe PD, Kaefer MA, et al (2006) Partial urogenital mobilization; a limited proximal dissection. J Pediatr Urol 2:351–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Passerini-Glazel G (1999) Feminizing genitoplasty. J Urol 161:1592–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peña A, Filmer B, Bonilla E, et al (1992) Transanorectal approach for the treatment of urogenital sinus: preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 27:681–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mure PY, Birraux J, Dahoun S, et al (2014) Laparoscopic assisted vaginal pull-through for high urogenital sinus in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. 25th annual ESPU meeting (Innsbruck), pp 7–10

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frank RT(1938) The formation of an artificial vagina without operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 135:1053–105

  14. Nakhal RS, Hall-Craggs M, Freeman A, et al (2013) Evaluation of retained testes in adolescent girls and women with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Radiology 268:153–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu AX, Shi HY, Cai ZJ, et al (2014) Increased risk of gonadal malignancy and prophylactic gonadectomy: a study of 102 phenotypic female patients with Y chromosome or Y-derived sequences. Hum Repro 29:1413–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Creighton SM, Minto CL, Steele SJ(2001) Objective cosmetic and anatomical outcomes at adolescence of feminising surgery for ambiguous genitalia done in childhood. Lancet 358:124–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Krege S, Walz KH, Hauffa BP, et al (2000) Long-term follow-up of female patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia from 21-hydroxylase deficiency, with special emphasis on the results of vaginoplasty. BJU Int 86:253–8. discussion 258–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Merke DP, Bornstein SR(2005) Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Lancet 365:2125–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Olgive CM, Crouch NS, Rumsby G, et al (2006) Congenital adrenal hyperplasia in adults: a review of medical, surgical and psychological issues Clin Endocrinol 64:2–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. -Y. Mure.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorduza, D.B., Margain-Deslandes, L., Mouriquand, P. et al. Génitoplasties féminisantes. Rev. med. perinat. 7, 161–170 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12611-015-0330-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12611-015-0330-z

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation