Résumé
La césarienne sur demande maternelle englobe une grande variété de situations qui ne se réduisent pas toutes à une pure convenance. Une mère exprimant une envie de césarienne peut réagir dans la continuité d’un traumatisme antérieur ou peut agir suite à une information biaisée. Le dialogue mère-soignant est primordial afin de comprendre la demande maternelle sous-jacente et pour y apporter la réponse la plus adaptée, qui n’est pas nécessairement une césarienne.
Abstract
Cesarean delivery by maternal request is a loosely defined concept and includes many cases, which cannot be reduced to simple convenience. A mother stating that she wishes a cesarean may also do so because of a previous trauma, or because she received biased information. Dialog between the mother and the practitioner is then crucial to understand the mother’s true needs and define the best solution, which is not always a cesarean.
Références
Le JDD (2008) Alerte aux césariennes inutiles (7 décembre 2008)
Andrist LC (2008) Implications of objectification theory for women’s health: menstrual suppression and “maternal request” cesarean delivery. Health Care Women Int 29(5):551–65
Bergeron V (2007) The ethics of cesarean section on maternal request: a feminist critique of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ position on patient-choice surgery. Bioethics 21(9):478–87
Jacquemyn Y, Ahankour F, Martens G (2003) Flemish obstetricians’ personal preference regarding mode of delivery and attitude towards caesarean section on demand. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 111(2):164–6
Groom KM, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM (2006) Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling? Birth 33(3):221–8
Halvorsen L, Nerum H, Øian P, Sørlie T (2008) Is there an association between psychological stress and request for caesarian section? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 128(12):1388–91
McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, et al (2007) Elective cesarean section and decision-making: a critical review of the literature. Birth 34(1):65–79
Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S (2007) Listening to mothers II: report of the Second National US Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. J Perinat Educ 16(4):9–14
Gamble JA, Creedy DK (2001) Women’s preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors. Birth 28(2):101–10
Gamble J, Creedy DK, McCourt C, et al (2007) A critique of the literature on women’s request for cesarean section. Birth 34(4):331–40
Weaver JJ, Statham H, Richards M (2007) Are there “unnecessary” cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for non-clinical indications. Birth 34(1): 32–4
NIH (2006) NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on cesarean delivery on maternal-request. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 23(1):1–29
ACOG (2007) ACOG Committee Opinion no 394, December 2007. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 110(6):1501
CNGOF (2000) Césarienne: conséquences et indications
Young D (2006) “Cesarean delivery on maternal request”: was the NIH conference based on a faulty premise? Birth 33(3):171–4
Fenwick J, Gamble J, Hauck Y (2006) Reframing birth: a consequence of cesarean section. J Adv Nurs 56(2):121–30
Turner CE, Young JM, Solomon MJ, et al (2008) Vaginal delivery compared with elective caesarean section: the views of pregnant women and clinicians. BJOG 115(12):1494–502
Nerum H, Halvorsen L, Sørlie T, Oian P (2006) Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counselling? Birth 33(3):221–8
Halvorsen L, Nerum H, Sørlie T, Oian P (2008) Does counsellor’s attitude influence change in a request for a caesarean in women with fear of birth? Midwifery 26(1):45–52
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Heimann, S. La césarienne sur demande maternelle: quelle est la vraie demande de la mère ?. Rev. med. perinat. 2, 8–11 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12611-009-0050-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12611-009-0050-3