Abdominal Obesity and Mobility Disability in Older Adults: A 4-Year Follow-Up of the International Mobility in Aging Study
Abdominal obesity is related to the disability process in older adults, however, little is known about this relationship when adjusted for important confounders such as depression and physical performance measures in a diverse international aged population.
To explore the longitudinal relationship between abdominal obesity and mobility disability controlling for physical performance and depression.
Design and Setting
Longitudinal observational study using data from the International Mobility in Aging Study (IMIAS) Study.
1104 out of 2002 older adults aged 64–74 years old free of mobility disability at baseline (2012) and then reassessed in 2016.
Mobility disability was defined as reporting difficulty in walking 400 m or climbing stairs. Activities of daily living (ADL) disability was based on any self-reported difficulty in five mobility-related ADLs. Abdominal obesity was defined as waist circumference ≥ 88cm for women or ≥ 102 cm for men. Four meters gait speed, handgrip strength and depressive symptoms (CES-D) were assessed. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) and multinomial regressions were used to estimate associations between disability and abdominal obesity.
1104 free of disability participants were followed over 4 years, the mean age was 68.9 (±2.9) years among men and 68.7 (±2.6) years among women. Prevalence and incidence rates of mobility disability varied widely across research site and sex. The longitudinal associations between mobility disability and abdominal obesity remained significant even when adjusted by depressive symptoms, handgrip strength, gait speed, age, sex, education and research site. Participants with abdominal obesity had higher mobility disability (OR=1.68, 95% CI 1.23-1.76, p-value=0.01) and also increased risk for ADL disability (OR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.23-1.76, p-value=0.01). Abdominal obesity in baseline was also predictor of mobility disability in 2016 (OR: 1.93, 95% CI 1.17-3.17, p-value <0.01) but not for ADL disability (OR: 1.59, 95% CI 0.93-2.71, p-value =0.09) with accounting mortality.
Abdominal obesity is associated longitudinally and predicts mobility disability, even over a short period (4 years) in community-dwelling older adults from different epidemiological contexts.
Key wordsDisability mobility activities of Daily Living abdominal obesity aging
- 1.World Health Organization., World Bank. World Report on Disability 2011. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- 11.Harris TB, Visser M, Everhart J, et al. Waist circumference and sagittal diameter reflect total body fat better than visceral fat in older men and women. The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;904:462–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06501.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Bianchi L, Ferrucci L, Cherubini A, et al (2015) The Predictive Value of the EWGSOP Definition of Sarcopenia: Results From the InCHIANTI Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2015;71:glv129-. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv129Google Scholar
- 23.Alexandre T da S, Scholes S, Ferreira Santos JL, et al. The combination of dynapenia and abdominal obesity as a risk factor for worse trajectories of IADL disability among older adults. Clin Nutr 2017;:. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.018Google Scholar
- 24.Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, et al. Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13:881–9. doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0246-zCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Gomez F, Zunzunegui MV, Alvarado B, et al. Cohort Profile: The International Mobility In Aging Study (IMIAS). Int J Epidemiol, 2018. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy074Google Scholar
- 29.Nagi SZ. An Epidemiology of Disability among Adults in the United States. 1976;54:439–467Google Scholar
- 33.World Health Organization (2000) WHO | Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- 34.National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and T of HBC in A (Adult TPI. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106:3143–421Google Scholar
- 35.Fess E. Grip Strength, 2nd ed. American Society of Hand Therapists, Chicago 1992Google Scholar
- 52.Abellan Van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, et al. Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13:881–889. doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0246-zCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 59.Bannerman E, Miller MD, Daniels LA, et al. Anthropometric indices predict physical function and mobility in older Australians: the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing. 2017;doi: 10.1079/PHN2002336Google Scholar