Status of Geriatrics in 22 Countries
The aim of this article is to describe the current status of geriatrics and position of geriatricians in 22 countries of three continents, and to portray their attitudes towards and resources allocated to geriatrics.
An electronic survey was delivered to a convenience sample of 22 geriatricians in leading positions of their countries.
The time required in post graduation specialist training to become a geriatrician varied from one year (subspecialty in the USA) to six years (independent specialty in Belgium). The number in the population aged 80+ per geriatrician varied from 450 (Austria) to 25,000 (Turkey). Of respondents, 55% reported that geriatrics is not a popular specialty in their country. Acute geriatric wards, rehabilitation and outpatient clinics were the most common working places for geriatricians. Nearly half of the respondents had an opinion that older patients who were acutely ill, were receiving subacute rehabilitation or had dementia should be cared for by geriatricians whereas half of the respondents would place geriatricians also in charge of nursing home and orthogeriatric patients. The biggest problems affecting older people’s clinical care in their countries were: lack of geriatric knowledge, lack of geriatricians, and attitudes towards older people. Half of respondents thought that older people’s health promotion and comprehensive geriatric assessment were not well implemented in their countries, although a majority felt that they could promote good geriatric care in their present position as a geriatrician.
The position of geriatric, geriatricians’ training and contents of work has wide international variety.
Key wordsStatus of geriatrics training position of geriatricians specialisation
- 2.American Geriatrics Society Core Writing Group of the Task Force on the Future Geriatric Medicine. Caring for older Americans: The future of geriatric medicine. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:S245-S56.Google Scholar
- 3.Cruz-Jentoft A, Franco A, Sommer P, Baeyens JP, Jankowska E, Maggi A, et al. Silver paper: the future of health promotion and preventive actions, basic research, and clinical aspects of age-related disease-a report of the European Summit on Age-Related Disease. Aging Clin Exp Res 2009;21: 376–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Crome P. Geriatrics in Europe, in H. M. Fillitt, K. Rockwood, and K. Woodhouse (ed). Brocklehurst’s Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology (Seventh Edition). Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. pp. 997–1004.Google Scholar
- 8.Pitkala K, Gladman J, Connolly M. Models of health care for older people. In Michel JP, Beattie BL, Martin FC, Walston JD (Eds). Oxford textbook of geriatric medicine. Third edition. Oxford University Press. 2018 (in press)Google Scholar
- 14.Löppönen M, Heinonen P, Jartti L, Halminen M, Rajala T, Viitanen M, Pitkala K, Strandberg TE. Geriatricians feel growing external appreciation of their work. Survey among Finnish geriatricians in 2013. Eur Ger Med 2015;6:570–2.Google Scholar
- 16.Baztán, J.J., Suárez-García, F.M., López-Arrieta, J., Rodríguez-Mañas, L., Rodríguez-Artalejo, F. (2009) Effectiveness of acute geriatric units on functional decline, living at home, and case fatality among older patients admitted to hospital for acute medical disorders: meta-analysis. BMJ 2009;338:b50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Strandberg TE, Koistinen P, Antikainen R, Kynsilehto EA, Määttä K, NIemelä M, Seppänen ML, Viramo P, Pitkälä K, O’Neill D. Increased work-satisfaction amongst geriatricians in Finland -an encouragement for further development of the specialty? Survey among geriatricians in Finland in 2008. Eur Geriar Med 2010;1:73–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Pitkala K, Strandberg T, Hartikainen S. Geriatricians are satisfied with their work. Findings from 2001 survey (In Finnish). Suom Lääkäril 2002;45:4615–7.Google Scholar