Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Construction of an integral formula of biological age for a healthy Chinese population using principle component analysis

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Background

Whereas chronological age (CA) cannot distinguish functional differences among individuals of the same age, the biological age (BA) may be used to reflect the functional state of the body. The purpose of this study was to construct an integral formula of the BA, by using principle component analysis (PCA).

Methods

The vital organ function of 505 healthy individuals of Han origin (age 35–91 years) was examined. A total of 114 indicators of cardiovascular, pulmonary, and brain functions, and clinical, inflammatory, genetic, psychological, and life habit factors were assessed as candidate indicators of aging. Candidate indicators were submitted with CA to correlation and redundancy analyses. The PCA method was used to build an integral formula of the BA for the population.

Results

Seven biomarkers were selected in accordance with a certain load standard. These biomarkers included the trail making test (TMT), pulse pressure (PP), mitral valve annulus ventricular septum of the peak velocity of early filling (MVES), minimum carotid artery intimalmedial thickness (IMTmin), maximum internal diameter of the carotid artery (Dmax), maximal midexpiratory flow rate 75/25 (MMEF75/25), and Cystatin C (CysC). The formula for the BA was: BA = 0.0685 (TMT) + 0.267 (PP)–1.375 (MVES) + 22.443 (IMTmin) + 2.962 (Dmax)–2.332 (MMEF75/25) + 16.104 (CysC) + 0.137 (CA) + 0.492.

Conclusion

Several genetic and lifestyle indicators were considered as candidate markers of aging. However, ultimately, only markers reflecting the function of the vital organs were included in the BA formula. This study represents a useful attempt to employ multiple indicators to build a comprehensive BA evaluation formula of aging populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hekimi S (2006) How genetic analysis tests theories of animal aging. Nature genetics 38:985–991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirkwood TBL, Austad SN (2000) Why do we age? NATURE-LONDON 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gunn DA, Rexbye H, Griffiths CEM et al (2009) Why some women look young for their age. PloS one 4:e8021.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Invidia L, Salvioli S, Altilia S, et al (2010) The frequency of Klotho KL-VS polymorphism in a large Italian population, from young subjects to centenarians, suggests the presence of specific time windows for its effect. Biogerontology 11:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wahlin Å, MacDonald SWS, de Frias CM, et al (2006) How do health and biological age influence chronological age and sex differences in cognitive aging: moderating, mediating, or both? Psychology and Aging 21:318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Majkić-Singh N (2011) What is a Biomarker? From its Discovery to Clinical Application.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klemera P, Doubal S (2006) A new approach to the concept and computation of biological age. Mechanisms of ageing and development 127:240–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura E, Miyao K (2008) Sex differences in human biological aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 63:936–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park JH, Cho BL, Kwon HT, et al (2009) Developing a biological age assessment equation using principal component analysis and clinical biomarkers of aging in Korean men. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 49:7–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bai X, Han L, Liu Q, et al (2010) Evaluation of Biological Aging Process-A Population-Based Study of Healthy People in China. Gerontology 56:129–140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. AihieSayer A, Osmond C, Briggs R, et al (1999) Do all systems age together? Gerontology 45:83–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shibata S, Levine BD (2006) Biological aortic age derived from the arterial pressure waveform. Journal of Applied Physiology 110:981–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahammer IM, Baltes PB (1972) Objective versus perceived age differences in personality: how do adolescents, adults, and older people view themselves and each other? Journal of Gerontology.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barak B, Schiffman LG (1981) Cognitive age: A nonchronological age variable. Advances in consumer research 8:602–606.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones DM, Song X, Rockwood K (2004) Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 52:1929–1933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bae CY, Kang YG, Kim S (2008) Development of models for predicting biological age (BA) with physical, biochemical, and hormonal parameters. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 47:253–265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grubb A, Björk J, Nyman U (2011) Cystatin C, a marker for successful aging and glomerular filtration rate, is not influenced by inflammation. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation 71:145–149.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Odden MC, Tager IB, Gansevoort RT (2010) Age and cystatin C in healthy adults: a collaborative study. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 25:463–469.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Odden MC, Chertow GM, Fried LF (2006) Cystatin C and measures of physical function in elderly adults. American journal of epidemiology 164:1180–1189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tombaugh TN (2004) Trail Making Test A and B: Normative data stratified by age and education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 19:203–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sprott RL (2010) Biomarkers of aging and disease: introduction and definitions. Experimental gerontology 45:2–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Butler RN, Sprott R, Warner H, et al (2004) Biomarkers of aging: from primitive organisms to humans. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A 59:560–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kenyon CJ. The genetics of ageing. Nature 464:504–12.

  24. Csiszar A, Labinskyy N, Jimenez R, et al (2009) Anti-oxidative and antiinflammatory vasoprotective effects of caloric restriction in aging: role of circulating factors and SIRT1. Mechanisms of ageing and development 130:518–527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salminen A, Kaarniranta K (2010) Insulin/IGF-1 paradox of aging: Regulation via AKT/IKK/NF-[kappa] B signaling. Cellular signalling 22:573–577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Coppé JP, Rodier F, Patil CK, et al (2011) Tumor suppressor and aging biomarker p16INK4a induces cellular senescence without the associated inflammatory secretory phenotype. Journal of Biological Chemistry 286:36396–36403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Gonzalo-Calvo D, Neitzert K, Fernández M, et al (2010) Differential inflammatory responses in aging and disease: TNF-α and IL-6 as possible biomarkers. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 49:733–737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Christensen K, Johnson TE, Vaupel JW (2006) The quest for genetic determinants of human longevity: challenges and insights. Nature Reviews Genetics 7:436–448.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuro-o M (2009) Klotho and aging. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects 1790:1049–1058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, Kidney Institute of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA General Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Beijing, PR China

    W. -G. Zhang, X. -F. Sun, G. -Y. Cai, X. -Y. Bai, M. Zhang & Xiang-Mei Chen

  2. Departments of Gerontology and Geriatrics, The First affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, PR China

    X. -J. Bai

  3. Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical University, Nanchang, PR China

    S. -Y. Zhu

  4. Department of Nephrology, Kidney Institute of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA General Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Beijing, 100853, People’s Republic of China

    X. -F. Sun & Xiang-Mei Chen

Authors
  1. W. -G. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. X. -J. Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. X. -F. Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. -Y. Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. X. -Y. Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. -Y. Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiang-Mei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang-Mei Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, W.G., Bai, X.J., Sun, X.F. et al. Construction of an integral formula of biological age for a healthy Chinese population using principle component analysis. J Nutr Health Aging 18, 137–142 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-013-0345-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-013-0345-8

Key words

Search

Navigation