Optimal preferred MSG concentration in potatoes, spinach and beef and their effect on intake in institutionalized elderly people
Elderly people may benefit from sensory stimulation to increase food intake since anorexia of ageing is prevalent among them. An optimal MSG concentration may increase the palatability of foods but this depends on the food and chemosensory status of the taster. Currently, the results on taste enhancing to increase intake are inconsistent.
To find an optimal preferred MSG concentration in mashed potatoes, spinach and ground beef and to determine whether this concentration increases consumption of these foods among institutionalized elderly people.
Single blind within subject cross-over study performed at the laboratory and in the residents’ own apartments.
33 elderly and 29 young people in the sensory study and 53 elderly people in the intake study.
Pleasantness of the foods was rated of the foods each with 0, 0.5, 0.8, 1.3 and 2.0 g of MSG/100g. Intake was measured by weighing back leftovers of 2 meals with MSG (0.5% in mashed potatoes, 2% in spinach and ground meat) and without MSG.
0.5% MSG (p<0.05) was preferred in mashed potatoes but no optimal preferred concentration was found for spinach and ground beef, possibly because of their complex taste. Intake was not different between the foods with and without MSG or the total meal (all p>0.68).
MSG (0.5% and 2%) does not guarantee a higher intake among elderly. The chemosensory heterogeneity of the elderly population requires more individual flavor enhancement to improve the dietary intake and sensory experience.
Key wordsElderly intake mono sodium glutamate optimal preferred concentration
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 12.Murphy C (1987) Flavor preference for monosodium glutamate and casein hydrolysate in young and elderly persons. Umami: A basic taste, pp139–151. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA.Google Scholar
- 16.Yamaguchi S, Takahashi C (1984) Hedonic functions of monosodium glutamate and four basic taste substances used at various concentration levels in single and complex systems. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 48(4), 1077–1081Google Scholar
- 17.Schiffman SS, Miletic IDJ (1999a) Effect of taste and smell on secretion rate of salivary IgA in elderly and young persons. Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging, 3(3), 158–164.Google Scholar
- 19.Henderson HHF, Toors H, Ebbelink-Bosch IJ, Rijks SE (1999) Het nieuwe kookboek. Kosmos Uitgevers BV, Utrecht, Nederland.Google Scholar
- 23.Nevo (1997) Stichting Nederlands voedingsstoffenbestand. Dutch Nutrient Database 1997, The Hague, The Netherlands: Voorlichtingsbureau voor de voeding.Google Scholar
- 24.Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ (1996) Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: the Mini Nutritional Assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation. Nutrition Review, 54(1 Pt 2), S59–65.Google Scholar
- 30.De Graaf C, Polet P, van Staveren WA (1994) Sensory perception and pleasantness of food flavors in elderly subjects. Journal of Gerontology Series A: American Biological Science and Medical Science, 49(3), 93–99.Google Scholar
- 44.Mathey MAM, Siebelink E, De Graaf C, van Staveren WA (2001) Flavor enhancement of food improves dietary intake and nutritional status of elderly nursing home residents. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, Biological sciences and Medical sciences 2001, 56(4), M200–M205.Google Scholar
- 48.Gilbert AN, Wysocki CJ (1987) National Geographic smell survey: The results. National Geographic, 172, 514–525.Google Scholar
- 49.Rouby, Note1. Catherine Rouby, Neurosciences et Systemes Sensoriels, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.orgGoogle Scholar