Advertisement

The Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Clinical Symptom, Weight Loss, Glycemic Control, Lipid and Hormonal Profiles, Biomarkers of Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Reza Tabrizi
  • Vahidreza Ostadmohammadi
  • Maryam Akbari
  • Kamran B. Lankarani
  • Sina Vakili
  • Payam Peymani
  • Maryam Karamali
  • Fariba Kolahdooz
  • Zatollah AsemiEmail author
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is to determine the effectiveness of probiotic supplementation on clinical symptoms, weight loss, glycemic control, lipid and hormonal profiles, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Eligible studies were systematically searched from Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases until January 2019. Cochran (Q) and I-square statistics were used to measure heterogeneity among included studies. Data were pooled by using random-effect model and expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Eleven articles were included in this meta-analysis. Probiotic supplementation significantly decreased weight (SMD − 0.30; 95% CI, − 0.53, − 0.07; P = 0.01), body mass index (BMI) (SMD − 0.29; 95% CI, − 0.54, − 0.03; P = 0.02), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (SMD − 0.26; 95% CI, − 0.45, − 0.07; P < 0.001), insulin (SMD − 0.52; 95% CI, − 0.81, − 0.24; P < 0.001), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (SMD − 0.53; 95% CI, − 0.79, − 0.26; P < 0.001), triglycerides (SMD − 0.69; 95% CI, − 0.99, − 0.39; P < 0.001), VLDL-cholesterol (SMD − 0.69; 95% CI, − 0.99, − 0.39; P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD − 1.26; 95% CI, − 2.14, − 0.37; P < 0.001), malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD − 0.90; 95% CI, − 1.16, − 0.63; P < 0.001), hirsutism (SMD − 0.58; 95% CI, − 1.01, − 0.16; P < 0.001), and total testosterone levels (SMD − 0.58; 95% CI, − 0.82, − 0.34; P < 0.001), and also increased the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) (SMD 0.41; 95% CI, 0.11, 0.70; P < 0.01), nitric oxide (NO) (SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.08, 0.59; P = 0.01), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (SMD 0.64; 95% CI, 0.38, 0.90; P < 0.001), glutathione (GSH) (SMD 0.26; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.52; P = 0.04), and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels (SMD 0.46; 95% CI, 0.08, 0.85; P = 0.01). Probiotic supplementation may result in an improvement in weight, BMI, FPG, insulin, HOMA-IR, triglycerides, VLDL-cholesterol, CRP, MDA, hirsutism, total testosterone, QUICKI, NO, TAC, GSH, and SHBG but did not affect dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels, and total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol levels in patients with PCOS.

Keywords

Probiotic Weight loss Glycemic control Lipids profiles Inflammation Oxidative markers Meta-analysis Polycystic ovary syndrome 

Notes

Funding

The current study was founded by a grant number (97-01-106-19022) from the Vice-chancellor for Research, SUMS, in Iran.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

For Studies with Human Subjects

All procedures utilized in the selected papers were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Authors of the selected papers obtained informed consent from all patients for being included in their studies.

References

  1. 1.
    Fauser BC, Tarlatzis BC, Rebar RW, Legro RS, Balen AH, Lobo R, Carmina E, Chang J, Yildiz BO, Laven JS, Boivin J, Petraglia F, Wijeyeratne CN, Norman RJ, Dunaif A, Franks S, Wild RA, Dumesic D, Barnhart K (2012) Consensus on women’s health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil Steril 97:28–38 e25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pasquali R (2018) Contemporary approaches to the management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 9:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vigouroux C (2010) What have we learned form monogenic forms of severe insulin resistance associated with PCOS/HAIRAN? Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 71:222–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dunaif A (2012) Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome revisited: an update on mechanisms and implications. Endocr Rev 33:981–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saleem F, Rizvi SW (2017) New therapeutic approaches in obesity and metabolic syndrome associated with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cureus 9:e1844.  https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1844 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keskin Kurt R, Okyay AG, Hakverdi AU, Gungoren A, Dolapcioglu KS, Karateke A, Dogan MO (2014) The effect of obesity on inflammatory markers in patients with PCOS: a BMI-matched case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290:315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boulman N, Levy Y, Leiba R, Shachar S, Linn R, Zinder O, Blumenfeld Z (2004) Increased C-reactive protein levels in the polycystic ovary syndrome: a marker of cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2160–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun J, Buys N (2015) Effects of probiotics consumption on lowering lipids and CVD risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Med 47:430–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bollero P, Di Renzo L, Franco R, Rampello T, Pujia A, Merra G, De Lorenzo A, Docimo R (2017) Effects of new probiotic mouthwash in patients with diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 21:5827–5836Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Samimi M, Dadkhah A, Haddad Kashani H, Tajabadi-Ebrahimi M, Seyed Hosseini E, Asemi Z (2018) The effects of synbiotic supplementation on metabolic status in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9405-z. Epub ahead of print
  11. 11.
    Ghanei N, Rezaei N, Amiri GA, Zayeri F, Makki G, Nasseri E (2018) The probiotic supplementation reduced inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Funct Foods 42:306–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shoaei T, Heidari-Beni M, Tehrani HG, Feizi A, Esmaillzadeh A, Askari G (2015) Effects of probiotic supplementation on pancreatic beta-cell function and C-reactive protein in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Int J Prev Med 6:27.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.153866 eCollection 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karimi E, Moini A, Yaseri M, Shirzad N, Sepidarkish M, Hossein-Boroujerdi M, Hosseinzadeh-Attar MJ (2018) Effects of synbiotic supplementation on metabolic parameters and apelin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Br J Nutr 119:398–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahmadi S, Jamilian M, Karamali M, Tajabadi-Ebrahimi M, Jafari P, Taghizadeh M, Memarzadeh MR, Asemi Z (2017) Probiotic supplementation and the effects on weight loss, glycaemia and lipid profiles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hum Fertil 20:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karamali M, Eghbalpour S, Rajabi S, Jamilian M, Bahmani F, Tajabadi-Ebrahimi M, Keneshlou F, Mirhashemi SM, Chamani M, Hashem Gelougerdi S, Asemi Z (2018) Effects of probiotic supplementation on hormonal profiles, biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Iran Med 21:1–7Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nasri K, Jamilian M, Rahmani E, Bahmani F, Tajabadi-Ebrahimi M, Asemi Z (2018) The effects of synbiotic supplementation on hormonal status, biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in subjects with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Endocr Disord 18:21.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-018-0248-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shabani A, Noshadian M, Jamilian M, Chamani M, Mohammadi S, Asemi Z (2018) The effects of a novel combination of selenium and probiotic on weight loss, glycemic control and markers of cardio-metabolic risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Funct Foods 46:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jamilian M, Mansury S, Bahmani F, Heidar Z, Amirani E, Asemi Z (2018) The effects of probiotic and selenium co-supplementation on parameters of mental health, hormonal profiles, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Ovarian Res 11:80.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0457-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Esmaeilinezhad Z, Babajafari S, Sohrabi Z, Eskandari MH, Amooee S, Barati-Boldaji R (2019) Effect of synbiotic pomegranate juice on glycemic, sex hormone profile and anthropometric indices in PCOS: a randomized, triple blind, controlled trial. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 29:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ostadmohammadi V, Jamilian M, Bahmani F, Asemi Z (2019) Vitamin D and probiotic co-supplementation affects mental health, hormonal, inflammatory and oxidative stress parameters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Ovarian Res 12:5.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0457-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kasinska MA, Drzewoski J (2015) Effectiveness of probiotics in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Pol Arch Med Wewn 125:803–813Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang Q, Wu Y, Fei X (2016) Effect of probiotics on glucose metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicina (Kaunas) 52:28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun J, Buys NJ (2016) Glucose- and glycaemic factor-lowering effects of probiotics on diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials. Br J Nutr 115:1167–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yao K, Zeng L, He Q, Wang W, Lei J, Zou X (2017) Effect of probiotics on glucose and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Med Sci Monit 23:3044–3053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hojlund K (2014) Metabolism and insulin signaling in common metabolic disorders and inherited insulin resistance. Dan Med J 61:B4890Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Moreno de Leblanc A, Perdigon G (2010) The application of probiotic fermented milks in cancer and intestinal inflammation. Proc Nutr Soc 69:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Deepak V, Ram Kumar Pandian S, Sivasubramaniam SD, Nellaiah H, Sundar K (2016) Optimization of anticancer exopolysaccharide production from probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus by response surface methodology. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 46:288–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dewulf EM, Cani PD, Neyrinck AM, Possemiers S, Van Holle A, Muccioli GG, Deldicque L, Bindels LB, Pachikian BD, Sohet FM, Mignolet E, Francaux M, Larondelle Y, Delzenne NM (2011) Inulin-type fructans with prebiotic properties counteract GPR43 overexpression and PPARgamma-related adipogenesis in the white adipose tissue of high-fat diet-fed mice. J Nutr Biochem 22:712–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bansal D, Gudala K, Esam HP, Nayakallu R, Vyamusani RV, Bhansali A (2014) Microvascular complications and their associated risk factors in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Int J Chronic Dis 2014(2014):201423.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/201423 Epub 2014 Nov 30Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu D, Jiang XY, Zhou LS, Song JH, Zhang X (2016) Effects of probiotics on intestinal mucosa barrier in patients with colorectal cancer after operation: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3342.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fink LN, Zeuthen LH, Ferlazzo G, Frokiaer H (2007) Human antigen-presenting cells respond differently to gut-derived probiotic bacteria but mediate similar strain-dependent NK and T cell activation. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 51:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yan F, Polk DB (2002) Probiotic bacterium prevents cytokine-induced apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 277:50959–50965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ouwehand AC, Tiihonen K, Saarinen M, Putaala H, Rautonen N (2009) Influence of a combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and lactitol on healthy elderly: intestinal and immune parameters. Br J Nutr 101:367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rupa P, Mine Y (2012) Recent advances in the role of probiotics in human inflammation and gut health. J Agric Food Chem 60:8249–8256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    O'Keefe SJ (2016) Diet, microorganisms and their metabolites, and colon cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:691–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mendes MCS, Paulino DS, Brambilla SR, Camargo JA, Persinoti GF, Carvalheira JBC (2018) Microbiota modification by probiotic supplementation reduces colitis associated colon cancer in mice. World J Gastroenterol 24:1995–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Didari T, Mozaffari S, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M (2015) Effectiveness of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: updated systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 21:3072–3084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim JY, Kwon JH, Ahn SH, Lee SI, Han YS, Choi YO, Lee SY, Ahn KM, Ji GE (2010) Effect of probiotic mix (Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus) in the primary prevention of eczema: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 21:e386–e393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    King S, Glanville J, Sanders ME, Fitzgerald A, Varley D (2014) Effectiveness of probiotics on the duration of illness in healthy children and adults who develop common acute respiratory infectious conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 112:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mennini M, Dahdah L, Artesani MC, Fiocchi A, Martelli A (2017) Probiotics in asthma and allergy prevention. Front Pediatr 5:165.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2017.00165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bron PA, Kleerebezem M, Brummer RJ, Cani PD, Mercenier A, MacDonald TT, Garcia-Ródenas CL, Wells JM (2017) Can probiotics modulate human disease by impacting intestinal barrier function? Br J Nutr 117:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thomas CM, Versalovic J (2010) Probiotics-host communication: modulation of signaling pathways in the intestine. Gut Microbes 1:148–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reza Tabrizi
    • 1
  • Vahidreza Ostadmohammadi
    • 2
  • Maryam Akbari
    • 1
  • Kamran B. Lankarani
    • 3
  • Sina Vakili
    • 4
  • Payam Peymani
    • 3
  • Maryam Karamali
    • 5
  • Fariba Kolahdooz
    • 6
  • Zatollah Asemi
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Student Research CommitteeShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
  2. 2.Research Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic DiseasesKashan University of Medical SciencesKashanIslamic Republic of Iran
  3. 3.Health Policy Research CenterShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
  4. 4.Department of BiochemistryShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
  5. 5.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of MedicineIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  6. 6.Indigenous and Global Health Research, Department of MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations