Abstract
Mice were intraperitoneally infected with 2 × 108 cfu Staphylococcus aureus Xen 36 and treated with 2,130 AU (arbitrary units) nisin (equivalent to 27.7 μg pure nisin), a class Ia lantibiotic, over 7 days. The metabolic activity of S. aureus Xen 36, concluded from changes in cell bioluminescence, declined for the first 3.5 h, but increased over the next 24 h and remained at this level for the remainder of the 7-day trial. Similar results were obtained with heat-inactivated (25 min at 121 °C) nisin, suggesting that the decline in metabolic activity of S. aureus Xen 36 cannot be attributed to the bacteriostatic activity of nisin. The decline in lymphocyte numbers in infected mice was of smaller magnitude after treatment with active nisin compared to inactive nisin, suggesting that active nisin limited the apoptosis of lymphocytes. The drastic increase in neutrophil versus lymphocyte (N:L) ratio observed in the presence of active nisin suggested that the decline in metabolic activity of S. aureus Xen 36 was due to an immune response triggered by the infection. Nisin, active or inactive, stimulated the activity of cytokines interleukin-6, interleukin-10 and tumour necrosis factor. However, the overall immune response triggered by both forms of nisin was too minute to trigger an abnormally high antigenic immune reaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Begde D, Bundale S, Mashitha P, Rudra J, Nashikkar N, Upadhyay A (2010) Immunomodulatory efficacy of nisin—a bacterial lantibiotic peptide. J Pept Sci 17:438–444
Begley M, Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP (2010) Glutamate decarboxylase-mediated nisin resistance in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6541–6546
Brand AM, De Kwaadsteniet M, Dicks LMT (2010) The ability of Nisin F to control Staphylococcus aureus infection in the peritoneal cavity, as studied in mice. Lett Appl Microbiol 51:645–649
Breukink E, de Kruijff B (2006) Lipid II as a target for antibiotics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:321–332
Cheigh C-I, Park H, Choi H-J, Pyun Y-R (2005) Enhanced nisin production by increasing genes involved in nisin Z biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis A164. Biotechnol Lett 27:155–160
De Jager CPC, Van Wijk PTL, Mathoera RB, De Jongh-Leuvenink J, Van der Poll T, Wever PC (2010) Lymphocytopenia and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio predict bacteremia better than conventional infection markers in an emergency care unit. Crit Care 14:R192
De Kwaadsteniet M, Ten Doeschate K, Dicks LMT (2008) Characterization of the structural gene encoding nisin F, a new lantibiotic produced by a Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis isolate from freshwater fish (Clarias gariepinus). Appl Environ Microbiol 74:547–549
De Kwaadsteniet M, Ten Doeschate K, Dicks LMT (2009) Nisin F in the treatment of respiratory tract infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Lett Appl Microbiol 48:65–70
De Kwaadsteniet M, Van Reenen CA, Dicks LMT (2010) Evaluation of nisin F in the treatment of subcutaneous skin infections, as monitored by using a bioluminescent strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2:61–65
De Pablo MA, Gaforio JJ, Gallego AM, Ortega E, Gálvez AM, López AC (1999) Evaluation of immunomodulatory effects of nisin-containing diets on mice. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 24:35–42
Hotchkiss RS, Swanson PE, Freeman BD, Tinsley KW, Cobb JP, Matuschak GM, Buchman TG, Karl IE (1999) Apoptotic cell death in patients with sepsis, shock, and multiple organ dysfunction. Crit Care Med 27:1230–1251
Kindrachuk J, Jenssen H, Elliott M, Nijnik A, Magrangeas-Janot L, Pasupuleti M, Thorson L, Ma S, Easton DM, Bains M, Finlay B, Breukink EJ, Sahl HG, Hancock RE (2012) Manipulation of innate immunity by a bacterial secreted peptide: lantibiotic nisin Z is selectively immunomodulatory. Innate Immun 19(3):315–327. doi:10.1177/1753425912461456
LeBlanc JG, Aubry C, Cortes-Perez NG, de Moreno de LeBlanc A, Vergnolle N, Langella P, Azevedo V, Chatel JM, Miyoshi A and Bermúdez-Humarán LG (2013) Mucosal targeting of therapeutic molecules using genetically modified lactic acid bacteria: an update. FEMS Microbiol Lett 344(1):1–9. doi:10.1111/1574-6968.12159
LeBlanc JG, del Carmen S, Zurita Turk M, Alvarenga Lima F, Santos Pontes D, Miyoshi A, Azevedo V, de Moreno de LeBlanc A (2013) Mechanisms involved in the anti-inflammatory properties of native and genetically engineered lactic acid bacteria. Anti Infect Agents 11(1):59–69
Lowy FD (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 339:520–532
Rink R, Arkema-Meter A, Baudoin I, Post E, Kuipers A, Nelemans SA, Akanbi MH, Moll GN (2010) To protect peptide pharmaceuticals against peptidases. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 61:210–218
Sambrook JE, Fritsch F, Maniatis J (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor
Sun Z, Zhong J, Liang X, Liu J, Chen X, Huan L (2009) Novel mechanism for nisin resistance via proteolytic degradation of nisin by the nisin resistance protein NSR. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:1964–1973
Van Staden AD, Brand AM, Dicks LMT (2012) Nisin F-loaded brushite bone cement prevented the growth of Staphylococcus aureus in vivo. J Appl Microbiol 112:831–840
Villamil L, Figueras A, Novoa B (2003) Immunomodulatory effects of nisin in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol 14:157–169
Villatoro-Hernandez J, Montes-de-Oca-Luna R, Kuipers OP (2011) Targeting diseases with genetically engineered Lactococcus lactis and its course towards medical translation. Expert Opin Biol Ther 11:261–267
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa. The assistance of Mr. Noël Markgraaff in surgery of the mice is appreciated.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brand, A.M., Smith, C. & Dicks, L.M.T. The Effects of Continuous In Vivo Administration of Nisin on Staphylococcus aureus Infection and Immune Response in Mice. Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. 5, 279–286 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-013-9141-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-013-9141-3