Skip to main content
Log in

‘Genotype by yield*trait’ (GYT) biplot approach to evaluate resistance of soybean cultivars to Helicoverpa armigera Hübner under natural infestation conditions

  • Research
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cultivating insect-resistant plants is one of the essential parts of the integrated pest management approach. The genotype by yield*trait (GYT) biplot is a unique procedure for genotype evaluation through multiple traits. In the present study, soybean cultivars were planted on two sowing dates during two growing seasons. The cultivars were evaluated under the cotton bollworm (CBW), Helicoverpa armigera Hübner natural infestation conditions. Insect-damage-related traits were subjected to the GYT biplot analysis to identify the cultivars according to their tolerance against H. armigera and high yield performance and stability. According GT biplot analysis based on the angle between the traits (acute angle as positive, obtuse angle as negative and right angle as no correlations), the trichome density of the lower and upper surface of the leaves with grain yield was positive. Grain yield reduction (due to the insect damage) (YR) and pod damage (PD) were uncorrelated, and the correlation between biological yield reduction (BR) and PD was negative on the first sowing date. In contrast, the correlations of YR with PD, and BR with PD were positive on the second sowing date. All the yield-trait combinations were positively correlated on the first sowing date. A negative correlation between YLD*UTRM (trichome density of leaf upper surface) and YLD/YR, also between YLD*UTRM and YLD/BR was observed on the second sowing date. The GYT biplot showed cultivars Caspian and Williams had the best performance in combining yield and insect-damage-related traits under H. armigera infestation conditions on the first and second sowing dates, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Bastidas, A. M., Setiyono, T. D., Dobermann, A., Cassman, K. G., Elmore, R. W., Graef, G. L., & Specht, J. E. (2008). Soybean sowing date: The vegetative, reproductive, and agronomic impacts. Crop Science, 48(2), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.05.0292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, M., Godoy, A. F., Baptista, Y. A., Bentivenha, J. P. F., Lourenção, A. L., Baldin, E. L. L., & Catchot, A. L. (2020). Assessing soybean genotypes for resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 113(1), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, K. O. D. G., Gezan, S. A., Guimarães, C. T., Parentoni, S. N., Guimarães, P. E. D. O., Carneiro, N. P., ... & Pastina, M. M. (2018). Estimating genotype× environment interaction for and genetic correlations among drought tolerance traits in maize via factor analytic multiplicative mixed models. Crop Science, 58(1), 72–83.

  • Duffield, S.J. (1998). Pest management of Helicoverpa in the Riverina–using the tools at our disposal. Pest Management: Future Challenges, pp: 49–56.

  • Ebrahimi, L., Golmohammadi, G., & Shiri, M. (2022). Trichome density and pod damage rate as the key factors affecting soybean yield under natural infestation of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-022-00587-7.

  • Egli, D. B. (1993). Cultivar maturity and potential yield of soybean. Field Crops Research, 32(1–2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90027-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emden, V. H. (2002). Mechanisms of resistance: Antibiosis, antixenosis, tolerance, nutrition. Encyclopedia of Pest management (pp. 483–600). Marcel Dekker, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haile, F., Nowatzki, T., & Storer, N. (2021). Overview of pest status, potential risk, and management considerations of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) for US soybean production. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmaa030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handley, R., Ekbom, B., & Ågren, J. (2005). Variation in trichome density and resistance against a specialist insect herbivore in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecological Entomology, 30(3), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00699.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, M. E., Lamont, B. B., Fairbanks, M. M., & Rafferty, C. M. (2007). Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 8(4), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrick, L. F., Glover, K. D., Yabwalo, D., & Byamukama, E. (2020). Use of genotype by yield* trait (GYT) analysis to select hard red spring wheat with elevated performance for agronomic and disease resistance traits. Crop Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.20900/cbgg20200009

  • Moraes, R. F. O. D., Boiça Júnior, A. L., Eduardo, W. I., & Ribeiro, Z. A. (2020). Oviposition behavior of Helicoverpa armigera in soybean. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, 87. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657001252018.

  • Ortega, M. A., All, J. N., Boerma, H. R., & Parrott, W. A. (2016). Pyramids of QTLs enhance host–plant resistance and Bt-mediated resistance to leaf-chewing insects in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 129, 703–715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortel, C. C., Roberts, T. L., Hoegenauer, K. A., Purcell, L. C., Slaton, N. A., & Gbur, E. E. (2020). Soybean maturity group and planting date influence grain yield and nitrogen dynamics. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 3(1), e20077. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, R. H. (1951). Insect resistance in crop plants. McMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pennacchio, F., Giordana, B., & Rao, R. (2012). Applications of parasitoid virus and venom research in agriculture. In Parasitoid Viruses (pp. 269–283). Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. K., Varella, A. C., & Higley, L. G. (2017). Tolerance: The forgotten child of plant resistance. PeerJ, 5, e3934.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. A. (1996). Return to resistance: Breeding crops to reduce pesticide dependence. IDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. J., & Brier, H. B. (2010). Pest-damage relationships for Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on soybean (Glycine max) and dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) during pod-fill. Crop Protection, 29(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, H. C., Sujana, G., & Manohar Rao, D. (2009). Morphological and chemical components of resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera in wild relatives of pigeonpea. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 3(3), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-009-9068-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiri, M., Ebrahimi, L., & Badali, A. (2021). Evaluation of yield and some resistance-related traits of three maize hybrids against European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner). Cereal Research Communications, 49(3), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-020-00121-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. M. (2004). Plant resistance against pests issues and strategies. Potential, Constraints and Challenges.

  • Smith, C. M. (Ed.). (2005). Plant resistance to arthropods: Molecular and conventional approaches. Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. M. (2021). Conventional breeding of insect-resistant crop plants: Still the best way to feed the world population. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 45, 7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suits, R., Reisig, D., & Burrack, H. (2017). Feeding preference and performance of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae on various soybean tissue types. Florida Entomologist, 100(1), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umburanas, R. C., Yokoyama, A. H., Balena, L., Dourado-Neto, D., Teixeira, W. F., Zito, R. K., ... & Kawakami, J. (2019). Soybean yield in different sowing dates and seeding rates in a subtropical environment. International Journal of Plant Production, 13(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-019-00040-0.

  • Van Bueren, E. L., Jones, S. S., Tamm, L., Murphy, K. M., Myers, J. R., Leifert, C., & Messmer, M. M. (2011). The need to breed crop varieties suitable for organic farming, using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: A review. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 58(3–4), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2010.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • War, A. R., Paulraj, M. G., War, M. Y., & Ignacimuthu, S. (2011). Jasmonic acid-mediated-induced resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 30(4), 512–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-011-9213-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xing, Z., Liu, Y., Cai, W., Huang, X., Wu, S., & Lei, Z. (2017). Efficiency of trichome-based plant defense in Phaseolus vulgaris depends on insect behavior, plant ontogeny, and structure. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 2006. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, W., & Frégeau-Reid, J. (2018). Genotype by yield* trait (GYT) biplot: A novel approach for genotype selection based on multiple traits. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26688-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran which is greatly appreciated. The author really appreciates Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Moghan, Iran, for supports in the field experiments. Also, the author is immensely grateful to Dr. Mohammadreza Shiri for his valuable help and advises in statistical analysis.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran which is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Laleh Ebrahimi carried out the experiments and wrote the manuscript. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Laleh Ebrahimi.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laleh Ebrahimi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

The author declares that she has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebrahimi, L. ‘Genotype by yield*trait’ (GYT) biplot approach to evaluate resistance of soybean cultivars to Helicoverpa armigera Hübner under natural infestation conditions. Phytoparasitica 51, 909–918 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-023-01078-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-023-01078-7

Keywords

Navigation