Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of pyraclostrobin as a management tool of Groundnut ringspot virus in peanut crop

  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Yield losses due to Groundnut ringspot virus – GRSV (genus Orthotospovirus) infection have been observed across major peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) growing areas in Brazil. However, effective management systems capable of minimizing GRSV damage are not yet available. The aim of the present study was to verify the effectiveness of the pyraclostrobin (a strobilurin fungicide reported as a potential activator of natural, large–spectrum plant defense mechanisms) in the management of GRSV in peanuts. Two independent field experiments were carried out in commercial peanut areas with a natural occurrence of GRSV. A completely randomized block design was used with a 5 × 2 factorial scheme, including four replicates, five peanut cultivars (‘Runner IAC 886’, ‘IAC OL4’, ‘IAC 503’, ‘IAC 505’, and ‘Granoleico’) and two treatments (with and without pyraclostrobin application). At 80 and 100 days after sowing, visual disease severity scores and the number of infected plants were evaluated, followed by virus quantification in the leaf tissues and yield. The cultivars ‘Granoleico’ and ‘IAC 503’ displayed the highest levels of GRSV susceptibility. Pyraclostrobin was found to be effective in reducing the number of GRSV–infected plants, as well as in attenuating disease severity. In addition, pyraclostrobin was able to promote significant yield increase. Even though the mechanism(s) of pyraclostrobin action against GRSV remain elusive, this fungicide can be regarded as a potential component for viral disease management programs in peanuts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appiah, A. S., Offei, S. K., Tegg, R. S., & Wilson, C. R. (2016). Varietal response to groundnut rosette disease and the first report of Groundnut ringspot virus in Ghana. Plant Disease, 100(5), 946–952.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arruda, I. M., Moda-Cirino, V., Buratto, J. S., & Ferreira, J. M. (2015). Crescimento e produtividade de cultivares e linhagens de amendoim submetidas a déficit hídrico. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 45(2), 146–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, D. W., Clough, J. M., Godwin, J. R., Hall, A. A., Hamer, M., & Parr-Dobrzanski, B. (2002). The strobilurin fungicides. Pest Management Science, 58(7), 649–662.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camelo-García, V. M., Lima, E. F. B., Mansilla-Córdova, P. J., Rezende, J. A. M., Kitajima, E. W., & Barreto, M. (2014). Occurrence of Groundnut ringspot virus on Brazilian peanut crops. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 80(3), 282–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu Y, Chee P., Culbreath A., Isleib, T.G, Holbrook, C.C., Ozias-Akins, P. (2019) Major QTLs for resistance to early and late leaf spot diseases are identified on chromosomes 3 and 5 in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Frontiers in Plant Sciences, 10: 883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00883.

  • Costa, A. S. (1941). Uma moléstia de vírus de amendoim (Arachis hypogaea L.) a mancha anular. Biológico, 7(1), 249–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grichar, W. J., Jaks, A. J., & Besler, B. A. (2005). Response of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) to weather-based fungicide advisory sprays. Crop Protection, 24(4), 349–354.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culbreath, A. K., Todd, J. W., & Brown, S. L. (2003). Epidemiology and management of Tomato spotted wilt in peanut. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 41(1), 53–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Culbreath, A. K., Todd, J. W., Gorbet, D. W., Shokes, F. M., & Pappu, H. R. (1997). Field response of new peanut cultivar UF 91108 to Tomato spotted wilt virus. Plant Disease, 81(12), 1410–1415.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EPPO. European and Mediterraneam Plant Protection Organization. Distribution. Disponível em: <http://www.eppo.int>. Acesso em: 30/01/2019.

  • Fontes, M. G., Lima, M. F., Fonseca, M. E. N., & Boiteux, L. S. (2018). First Report of Groundnut ringspot orthotospovirus Infecting Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Crop in Brazil. Plant Disease, 102(2), 457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontes, M. G., Silva, G. F. A., Lima, M. F., Fonseca, M. E. N., Costa, A. F., Silva-Filho, J. G., & Boiteux, L. S. (2019). First report of groundnut ringspot orthotospovirus infecting soybeans in Brazil. Plant Disease, 103(4), 777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, I. J. D., Santos, J. F. D., Michelotto, M. D., Moraes, A. R. A. D., Bolonhezi, D., Freitas, R. S. D., Carvalho, C. R. L. ., Finoto, E. L., & Martins, A. L. M. (2017). IAC OL 5-new high oleic runner peanut cultivar. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 17(3), 295–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, I. J., Bolonhezi, D., Michelotto, M. D., Finoto, E. L., Kasai, F. S., & Freitas, R. S. (2014). Amendoim – Arachis hypogaea L. In A. T. E. Aguiar, C. Gonçalves, M. E. A. G. Z. Paterniani, M. L. S. Tucci, & C. E. F. Castro (Eds.), Instruções agrícolas para as principais culturas econômicas (7a Ed. rev. e atual ed., pp. 22–27). Campinas: Instituto Agronômico (Boletim IAC, n° 200).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghini, R., & Kimati, H. (2000). Resistência de fungos a fungicidas (1st ed., 78p). Jaguariúna: Embrapa Meio Ambiente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herms, S., Seehaus, K., Koehle, H., & Conrath, U. (2002). A strobilurin fungicide enhances the resistance of tobacco against Tobacco mosaic virus and Pseudomonas syringae pv tabaci. Plant Physiology, 130(1), 120–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, R. S., Johnson, W. G., & Wise, K. A. (2011). The impact of a fungicide and an insecticide on soybean growth, yield, and profitability. Crop Protection, 30(12), 1629–1634.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. B., Bowen, C. R., & Hartman, G. L. (2013). Effect of fungicide application and cultivar on soybean green stem disorder. Plant Disease, 97(9), 1212–1220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jadoski, C. J., Rodrigues, J. D., Soratto, R. P., Dos Santos, C. M., & Ribeiro, E. (2015). Ação fisiológica da piraclostrobina na assimilação de CO2 e enzimas antioxidantes em plantas de feijão condicionado em diferentes tensões de água no solo. Irriga, 20(2), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, M., & Joshi, J. (2014). Impact of pyraclostrobin (F-500) on crop plants. Plant Science Today, 1(3), 174–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P., Adkins, S., Alkhovsky, S. V., Avšič-Županc, T., Ballinger, M. J., Bente, D. A., ... Buchmeier, M. J. (2019). Taxonomy of the order Bunyavirales: Second update 2018. Archives of Virology, 1–15.

  • Michelotto, M. D., Lamana, L. E. P., & Godoy, I. J. (2017). Efeito do estande de plantas na expressão da virose em amendoim no Estado de São Paulo. Pesquisa & Tecnologia, 14(2), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelotto, M. D., Carrega, W. C., Lamana, L. E. P., Souza, T. M., Goday, I. J., Reis, L. N. A., Sales, A. L. M., & Pereira-Carvalho, R. C. (2019). Losses caused by Groundnut ringspot tospovirus in peanut crop in the state of São Paulo. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 6(3), 3429–3442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, M., Gallo-Meagher, M., Gorbet, D. W., & Meagher, R. L. (2006). Utilizing immunoassays to determine systemic Tomato spotted wilt virus infection for elucidating field resistance in peanut. Crop Protection, 25(3), 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. A., & Meinhardt, C. G. (2011). Foliar boron and pyraclostrobin effects on corn yield. Agronomy Journal, 103(5), 1352–1358.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, S. C., Castroagudín, V. L., Maciel, J. L. N., Pereira, D. A. S., & Ceresini, P. C. (2015). Resistência cruzada aos fungicidas IQo azoxistrobina e piraclostrobina no patógeno da brusone do trigo Pyricularia oryzae no Brasil. Summa Phytopathologica, 41(3), 298–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parreira, D. F., Neves, W. D. S., & Zambolim, L. (2009). Resistência de fungos a fungicidas inibidores de quinona. Revista Trópica, 3(2), 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. P., Erickson, J. E., Boote, K. J., Tillman, B. L., Jones, J. W., & van Bruggen, A. H. C. (2011). Late leaf spot effects on growth, photosynthesis, and yield in peanut cultivars of differing resistance. Agronomy Journal, 103, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skandalis, N., Dimopoulou, A., Beri, D., Tzima, A., Malandraki, I., Theologidis, I., & Vassilakos, N. (2016). Effect of pyraclostrobin application on viral and bacterial diseases of tomato. Plant Disease, 100(7), 1321–1330.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R., Abney, M. R., Culbreath, A. K., Kemerait, R. C., Tubbs, R. S., Monfort, W. S., & Pappu, H. R. (2017). Three decades of managing Tomato spotted wilt virus in peanut in southeastern United States. Virus Research, 241(15), 203–212.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, P., McDonald, D., Gibbons, R. W., & Reddy, L. J. (1985). Peanut rust: A major threat to peanut production in the semiarid tropics. Plant Disease, 69(9), 813–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. G., Frantz, G., Reitz, S. R., Funderburk, J. E., Mellinger, H. C., Mcavoy, E., & Daughtrey, M. L. (2015). Emergence of Groundnut ringspot virus and Tomato chlorotic spot virus in vegetables in Florida and the southeastern United States. Virology, 105(1), 388–397.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by CAPES and CNPq.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Apta, Polo Regional Centro Norte, Rodovia Washington Luis, Km 372, C. Postal 24, CEP 15830-000, Pindorama, SP, 15830-000, Brazil

    Marcos Doniseti Michelotto

  2. Universidade de Brasília, UnB, Brasília, DF, Brazil

    Rita de Cássia Pereira-Carvalho & Luciane de Nazaré Almeida dos Reis

  3. Embrapa Hortaliças, Brasília, DF, Brazil

    Leonardo Silva Boiteux

  4. Departamento de Produção Vegetal, FCAV/Unesp, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil

    Willians César Carrega

  5. Instituto Taquaritinguense de Ensino Superior–ITES, Taquaritinga, SP, Brazil

    Luis Eduardo Prado Lamana

  6. Centro de Grãos e Fibras, IAC, Campinas, SP, Brazil

    Ignácio José de Godoy

Authors
  1. Marcos Doniseti Michelotto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rita de Cássia Pereira-Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luciane de Nazaré Almeida dos Reis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leonardo Silva Boiteux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Willians César Carrega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Luis Eduardo Prado Lamana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ignácio José de Godoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita de Cássia Pereira-Carvalho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent

All authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michelotto, M.D., de Cássia Pereira-Carvalho, R., de Nazaré Almeida dos Reis, L. et al. Evaluation of pyraclostrobin as a management tool of Groundnut ringspot virus in peanut crop. Phytoparasitica 48, 719–726 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-020-00836-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-020-00836-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation