Skip to main content
Log in

Antinutritional factors in ricebean, Vigna umbellata Thunb. (Ohwi and Ohashi) against Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)

  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To identify some effective and eco-friendly inhibitors of a serious pest of pulse crops, Callosobruchus maculatus, seeds of 10 genotypes of rice bean, Vigna umbellata and mungbean variety, PAU 911 as susceptible check were screened. The different genotypes of rice bean were found to arrest the growth and development of C. maculatus at grub stages in varying levels. To confirm these results, the seeds of different test genotypes were analysed for the presence of three antinutritional factors (tannins, phytic acid and saponins). The amount of tannins, phytic acid and saponins was recorded highest in rice bean genotype LRB 507 (11.12 mg g−1), LRB 482 (32.30 mg g−1) and LRB 535 (4.17 mg g−1), respectively whereas lowest in mungbean variety, PAU 911 (8.24, 13.51 and 1.12 mg g−1, respectively). These antinutritional factors showed a negative correlation with adult emergence, growth index and adult longevity of C. maculatus but positive correlation with development period. Based on the results of the present study, all the rice bean genotypes were identified as resistant to C. maculatus as compared to susceptible check variety, PAU 911. The role of antinutritional factors in relation to C. maculatus infestation is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. (1970). Selected statistical data storage: where the loss is caused. Pesticides, 4, 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi, C. P., Thakur, M., Dua, R. P., & Dhaliwal, Y. S. (2011). Biochemical evaluation of some promising varieties/genotypes of rice bean [Vigna umbellata Thunb. (Ohwi and Ohashi)]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Biochemistry, 24, 39–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, N. M., & Vieria, R. D. (1996). Ricebean [Vigna umbellata Thunb. (Ohwi and Ohashi)]. In E. Nkowolo & J. Smartt (Eds.), Legumes and oilseeds in nutrition (pp. 222–228). U.S.: Chapman and Hall.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chandel, K. P. S., Joshi, B. S., Arora, R. K., & Pant, K. C. (1978). Rice bean-a new pulse with high potential. Indian Farming, 28, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandel, K. P. S., Arora, R. K., & Pant, K. C. (1988). Rice bean - a potential grain legume. NBPGR scientific monograph No. 12. New Delhi: NBPGR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, H. S., & Singh, B. C. (1990). CPCS1: A computer programs package for analysis of commonly used experimental designs (p. 46). Ludhiana: Punjab Agricultural University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daglish, G. J., Hall, E. A., Zoretto, M. J., Lambkin, T. M., & Erbachier, J. M. (1993). Efficacy of protectants against Callosobruchus phaseoli (Gyll.) and C. maculatus (F.) in mungbean. Journal of Stored Products Research, 29, 345–349.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, D. E., & Oakenfull, D. (1983). Saponin content of food plants and some prepared foods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 34, 186–191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ignacimuthu, S., Janarthanan, S., & Balachandran, B. (2000). Chemical basis of resistance in pulses to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 36, 89–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kashiwaba, K., Tomooka, N., Kaga, A., Han, O. K., & Vaughan, D. A. (2003). Characterization of resistance to three bruchid species (Callosobruchus spp., Coleoptera, Bruchidae) in cultivated rice bean (Vigna umbellata). Journal of Economic Entomology, 96, 207–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khush, G. S., & Brar, D. S. (1991). Genetics of resistance to insects in crop plants. Advances in Agronomy, 45, 223–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahendran, K., & Mohan, S. (2002). Technology adoption, estimation of loss and farmers behavior in pulses storage. A study in Western Tamil Nadu. Pestology, 26, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marconi, E., Ruggerei, S., & Carnovale, E. (1997). Chemical evaluation of wild under-exploited Vigna spp. seeds. Food Chemistry, 59, 203–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Modgil, R., & Mehta, U. (1993). Antinutritional factors in pulses as influenced by different levels of Callosobruchus chinensis L. (Bruchids) infestation. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 44, 111–117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, V. R., & Janardhan, K. (1994). Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of raw seeds of six rice bean varieties. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society, 73, 259–263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mubarak, A. K. (2005). Nutritional composition and antinutritional factors of mungbean seeds (Phaseolus aureus) as affected by some home traditional processes. Food Chemistry, 89, 489–495.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sachdeva, J. S., Seth, R. K., & Sehgal, S. S. (1986). Relative susceptibility of twelve promising varieties of cowpea to Callosobruchus infestation. Bulletin of Grain Technology, 24, 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadasivam, S., & Manickam, A. (1992). Biochemical methods for agricultural sciences. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saharan, K., Khetarpaul, N., & Bishnoi, S. (2002). Variability in physico-chemical properties and nutrient composition of newly released rice bean and faba bean cultivars. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 15, 159–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saikia, P., Sarkar, C. R., & Borua, I. (1999). Chemical composition, antinutritional factors and effect of cooking on nutritional quality of rice bean, Vigna umbellata (Thumb; Ohwi and Ohashi). Food Chemistry, 67, 347–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V., & Singh, B. (1992). Tropical grain legumes as important human foods. Economic Botany, 46, 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T., & Durairaj, C. (2007). Biochemical basis of resistance in rice bean, Vigna umbellata Thunb. (Ohwi & Ohashi) against Callosobruchus maculatus F. Journal of Entomology, 4, 371–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tajoddin, M. D., Shinde, M., & Lalitha, J. (2011). In vivo reduction in phytic acid content of mungbean (Phaseolus aureus L) cultivars during germination. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 10, 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomooka, N., Kashiwaba, K., Vaughan, D. A., Ishimoto, M., & Egawa, Y. (2000). The effectiveness of evaluating wild species searching for source of resistance to bruchid beetles in the genus Vigna subgenus Certotropis. Euphytica, 115, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincenzo, L., Roberto, T., Nunzia, C., Angela, C., Donato, V., & Vito, L. (2005). Seed coat tannins and bruchid resistance in stored cowpea seeds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85, 839–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamel, M. B., & Shelef, L. A. (1982). Phytic acid hydrolysis with soluble zinc and iron in whole wheat bread as affected by calcium containing additives. Journal of Food Science, 47, 535–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Dr. (Mrs.) Ranjit Kaur Gill, Assistant Plant Breeder, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana for providing seed of different test genotypes for research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harmeet Kaur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, H., Gill, R.S. & Kaur, S. Antinutritional factors in ricebean, Vigna umbellata Thunb. (Ohwi and Ohashi) against Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Phytoparasitica 44, 609–614 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-016-0554-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-016-0554-x

Keywords

Navigation