, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 125–131 | Cite as

Interactions between the introduced fungal pathogen Entomophaga maimaiga and indigenous tachinid parasitoids of gypsy moth Lymantria dispar in Bulgaria

  • Georgi Georgiev
  • Zdravko Hubenov
  • Margarita Georgieva
  • Plamen Mirchev
  • Maria Matova
  • Leellen F. Solter
  • Daniela Pilarska
  • Plamen Pilarski


Interactions between the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Erebidae), pathogenic fungus Entomophaga maimaiga, and the tachinid parasitoid (Diptera: Tachinidae) complex in gypsy moth larvae were investigated in Bulgaria, where E. maimaiga was recently released as a biological control agent. Gypsy moth larvae were collected in oak stands where E. maimaiga was originally introduced (nine sites) and in sites where the pathogen has invaded by natural extension of the range (ten sites). In total, 4,375 host larvae were examined and 401 tachinid larvae emerged from parasitized hosts. Host mortality caused by tachinids varied from 0 to 48.5% among sites, with an overall average of 9.2%. Emerging adult tachinid parasitoids included 54 individuals belonging to six species: Compsilura concinnata, Exorista larvarum, Senometopia separata, Senometopia excisa, Drino incospiqua and Zenilia libatrix; the remaining parasitoids (86.5%) died in the pupal stage. E. maimaiga azygospores were observed on puparia surfaces, an indication that the gypsy moth host larvae were infected with the fungus. No azygospores were observed in parasitoid tissues. The high parasitoid mortality may be the result of the competition with E. maimaiga during development in the same host.


Mortality Parasitism Tachinidae 


  1. Cerretti, P., & Tschorsnig, H.-P. (2010). Annotated host catalogue for the Tachinidae (Diptera) of Italy. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, A, Neue Serie, 3, 305–340.Google Scholar
  2. Coulson, J. R. (1981). Parasites, foreign explorations, recent history: 1961–77. In: C. Doane, & M. McManus (Eds.) The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management (pp. 302–310). USDA Forest Service Technical Bulletin, 1584.Google Scholar
  3. Gantschew, G. (1975). Artenzusammenstand und Verbreitung der Parasiten auf den Schammsptner von der Familie Tachinidae (Dipt.) und ihre Hiperparasiten. Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten, Forsttechnische Hochschule. Sofia (Serie Forstwesen), 20, 97–103. (Bulgarian; German summary).Google Scholar
  4. Georgiev, G. (1996). Bioecological features of parasitoids on the adult larvae and pupae of the satin moth (Stilpnotia salicis L., Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in Bulgaria. Forest Science, 3, 57–64. (Bulgarian; English summary).Google Scholar
  5. Georgiev, G., Mirchev, P., Georgieva, M., Rossnev, B., Petkov, P., Matova, M., et al. (2012). First record of entomopathogenic fungus Entomophaga maimaiga Humber, Shimazu and Soper (Entomophthorales: Entomophthoraceae) in Lymantria dispar (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in Turkey. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 64, 123–127.Google Scholar
  6. Georgiev, G., Mirchev, P., Rossnev, B., Petkov, P., Georgieva, M., Matova, M., et al. (2011). Introduction of Entomophaga maimaiga and control of Lymantria dispar calamities in Bulgaria. In S. Kitanova (Ed.), Proceedings of Scientific Conference Sustainable Management of Oak Forests in Bulgaria (pp. 72–79). Primorsko (Bulgarian; English summary).Google Scholar
  7. Godwin, P. A., & Shields, K. S. (1984). Effects of Blepharipa pretensis [Dip.: Tachinidae] on the pathogenicity of nucleopolyhedrosis virus in stage V of Lymantria dispar [Lep.: Lymantriidae]. Entomophaga, 29, 381–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hajek, A. E. (1999). Pathology and epizootiology of Entomophaga maimaiga infections in forest Lepidoptera. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 63, 814–835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hajek, A. E., McManus, M., & Delalibera, I. Jr. (2005). Catalogue of introductions of pathogens and nematodes for classical biological control of insects and mites. FHTET-2005-05.
  10. Herting, B. (1960). Biologie der westpaläarktischen Raupenfliegen (Dipt., Tachinidae). Monographien zur Angewandte Entomologie, 16, 1–188.Google Scholar
  11. Hoch, G., Solter, L. F., & Schopf, A. (2004). Hemolymph melanization and alterations in hemocyte numbers in Lymantria dispar larvae following infections with different entomopathogenic microsporidia. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 113, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hubenov, Z. (1985). On hosts of family Tachinidae (Diptera) species in Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 27, 27–35. (Bulgarian; English and Russian summaries).Google Scholar
  13. Hubenov, Z. (1991). Addition to list of hosts of the Bulgarian Tachinidae (Diptera). Acta Entomologica Bulgarica, 7, 51–56. (Bulgarian; English summary).Google Scholar
  14. Karnožitzky, N. (1957). Die Massenvermehrungen des Schwammspinners im Gebiet um Varna und möglichkeiten der biologischen Bekämpfung. Proceedings of Institute of Zoology, BAS, 4, 103. (Bulgarian).Google Scholar
  15. Keremidtschiev, М. (1954). Schädigung unserer Wälder durch die Ocneria dispar und Vorkehrungen zur Bekämpfung der Letzteren. Proceedings of Forest Research Institute, 2, 243–296 (Bulgarian; Russian and German summaries).Google Scholar
  16. Kereselidze, M., Pilarska, D., Hajek, A., Jensen, A. B., & Linde, A. (2011). First record of Entomophaga maimaiga Humber, Shimazu & Soper (Entomophthorales: Entomophthoraceae) in Georgia. Biocontrol, Science and Technology, 21, 1375–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malakar, R., Elkinton, J. S., Hajek, A. E., & Burand, J. P. (1999). Within-host interactions of Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) nucleopolyhedrosis virus (LdNPV) and Entomophaga maimaiga Humber, Shimazu et Soper (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 73, 91–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McManus, M., & Csóka, G. (2007). History and impact of gypsy moth in North America and comparison to recent outbreaks in Europe. USDA Forest Service Technical Bulletin, 3, 47–64.Google Scholar
  19. McManus, M., & McIntyre, T. (1981). Introduction. In C. Doane, & M. McManus (Eds.) The gypsy moth: Research toward integrated pest management (pp. 1–7), USDA Forest Service Technical Bulletin, 1584.Google Scholar
  20. Mesnil, L. (1944–1975). Larvaevorinae. In E. Lindner (Ed.) Die fliegen der palaarktischen region, 64 g. Stuttgart, Germany: Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
  21. Mirchev, P., Georgiev, G., & Tsankov, G. (1999). Parasitoids of noxious lepidopteran (Lepidoptera) insect pests in oak forests in Bulgaria. III. Tachinidae (Diptera). Forestry Ideas, 1, 74–79. (Bulgarian; English summary).Google Scholar
  22. Nielsen, J. (1912). Undersögelser over entoparasitiske Muscidelarver hos Arthropoder. Videnskabelige Meddelelser Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening, 64, 215–248.Google Scholar
  23. Pilarska, D., Linde, A., Pilarski, P., Georgiev, G., McManus, M., & Solter, L. (2010). Release of entomophthoralean and microsporidian fungal pathogens for biological control of gypsy moth in Bulgaria and the United States. In: Book of abstracts ‘Population dynamics, biological control, and integrated management of forest insects’, (Eberswalde, Germany)Google Scholar
  24. Pilarska, D., Linde, A., Pilarski, P., Georgiev, G., Takov, D., & Solter, L. (2010). Release of Nosema lymantriae, Vairimorpha disparis and Entomophaga maimaiga for classical and augmentative biological control of gypsy moth in Bulgaria and the United States. In: 43rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Invertebrate Pathology (Trabzon, Turkey).Google Scholar
  25. Pilarska, D., McManus, M., Herard, F., Vega, F., Pilarski, P., et al. (2000). Introduction of the entomopathogenic fungus Entomophaga maimaiga Hum., Shim. & Sop. (Zygomycetes:Entomophtorales) to a Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) population in Bulgaria. Journal of Pest Science, 73, 125–126.Google Scholar
  26. Pilarska, D., McManus, M., Pilarski, P., Georgiev, G., Mirchev, P., & Linde, A. (2006). Monitoring the establishment and prevalence of the fungal entomopathogen Entomophaga maimaiga in two Lymantria dispar L. populations in Bulgaria. Journal of Pest Science, 79, 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pilarska, D., Todorov, M., Pilarski, P., Djorova, V., Solter, L., & Georgiev, G. (2012). Bioassays for detection of the entomopathogenic fungus Entomophaga maimaiga (Entomophtorales: Entomophtoraceae) in soil from different sites in Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica (in press).Google Scholar
  28. Reardon, R. C. (1981). Parasite/gypsy moth interactions: Summary and suggested areas of future research. In C. Doane, & M. McManus (Eds.) The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. pp. 95–96. USDA Forest Service Technical Bulletin, 1584.Google Scholar
  29. Reardon, R. C. (1981). Parasites, foreign explorations, past history: 1900–60. In C. Doane, & M. McManus (Eds.) The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. pp. 301–302. USDA Forest Service Technical Bulletin, 1584. Google Scholar
  30. Reardon, R. C. (1981). Rearing, evaluating, and attempting to establish exotic species and redistributing established species, attempts before 1960. In C. Doane, & M. McManus (Eds.) The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. pp. 348–351. USDA Forest Service Technical Bulletin, 1584.Google Scholar
  31. Richter, V. (2004). Tachinidae. In: P. Ler (Ed.) Key to the insects of Russian Far East. Diptera and Sifonaptera. 6 (3). pp. 148–398. Vladivostok, Russia: Dalnauka. (Russian)Google Scholar
  32. Shima, H. (2006). A host-parasite catalog of Tachinidae (Diptera) of Japan. Makunagi Acta Dipterologica, 2, 1–171.Google Scholar
  33. Solter, L. F., & Hajek, A. E. (2009). Control of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, in North America since 1878. In A. E. Hajek, M. O’Callaghan, & T. Glare (Eds.), Use of microbes for control and eradication of invasive arthropods (pp. 181–212). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer Publ. Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tabaković-Tošić, M., Georgiev, G., Mirchev, P., Tošić, D., & Golubović-Ćurguz, V. (2012). Entomophaga maimaiga – new entomopathogenic fungus in the Republic of Serbia. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11, 8571–8577.Google Scholar
  35. Tschorsnig, H.-P., & Herting, B. (1994). Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen und Angaben zur Verbreitung und Ökologie der einzelnen Arten. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie A, 506, 1–170.Google Scholar
  36. Tschorsnig, H.-P., & Richter, V. (1998). Family Tachinidae. In L. Papp & B. Darvas (Eds.), Contributions to a manual of Palaearctic Diptera (pp. 691–827). Budapest, Hungary: Science Herald.Google Scholar
  37. Tschorsnig, H.-P., Richter, V., Cerretti, P., Zeegers, T., Bergstrom, C., Vanchara, J., et al. (2005). Tachinidae (Diptera). In: Fauna Europaea,

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgi Georgiev
    • 1
  • Zdravko Hubenov
    • 2
  • Margarita Georgieva
    • 1
  • Plamen Mirchev
    • 1
  • Maria Matova
    • 1
  • Leellen F. Solter
    • 3
  • Daniela Pilarska
    • 4
    • 5
  • Plamen Pilarski
    • 6
  1. 1.Forest Research InstituteBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.National Museum of Natural HistoryBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  3. 3.Illinois Natural History SurveyPrairie Research Institute at the University of IllinoisChampaignUSA
  4. 4.Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem ResearchBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  5. 5.Faculty of Forestry and Wood SciencesCzech University of Life SciencesSuchdolCzech Republic
  6. 6.Institute of Plant Physiology and GeneticsBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations