Skip to main content

Digital Work Design

The Interplay of Human and Computer in Future Work Practices as an Interdisciplinary (Grand) Challenge

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Bergman M, Lyytinen K, Mark G (2007) Boundary objects in design: an ecological view of design artifacts. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(11):546–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker S, Grønbæk K (1991) Cooperative prototyping: users and designers in mutual activity. Int J Man Mach Stud 34(3):453–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bødker K, Kensing F, Simonsen J (2009) Participatory IT design: designing for business and workplace realities. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratteteig T, Wagner I (2016) Unpacking the notion of participation in participatory design. Comput Supported Coop Work 25(6):425–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio WF, Montealegre R (2016) How technology is changing work and organizations. Ann Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 3:349–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013) Multi annual roadmap for the contractual PPP under horizon 2020. http://www.effra.eu/sites/default/files/factories_of_the_future_2020_roadmap.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2018

  • Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ Sci 22(5):1240–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd C, Mehl W-M, Reisin F-M, Schmidt G, Wolf G (1989) Out of Scandinavia: alternative approaches to software design and system development. Hum Comput Interact 4:253–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol Forecast Soc Change 114(1):254–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP (2007) Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J Appl Psychol 92(5):1332–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper H-G, Feld T, Hoffmann M (2014) Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(4):239–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luczak H (2013) Arbeitswissenschaft. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika J, Chui M, Miremadi M, Bughin J, George K, Willmott P, Dewhurst M (2017) A future that works: automation, employment, and productivity. McKinsey, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford E (2003) Redesigning human systems. IGI Global, Hershey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini D (2012) Practice theory, work, and organization: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen L (2012) Personas-user focused design. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci 11(4):404–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SK, Wall TD, Cordery JL (2001) Future work design research and practice: towards an elaborated model of work design. J Occup Organ Psychol 74(4):413–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt J, Grudin J (2003) Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on designing for user experiences, ACM, San Francisco, pp 1–15

  • Rajkumar RR, Lee I, Sha L, Stankovic J (2010) Cyber-physical systems: the next computing revolution. In: Proceedings of the 47th design automation conference, ACM, Anaheim, pp 731–736

  • Randall D, Harper R, Rouncefield M (2007) Fieldwork for design: theory and practice. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richter A, Riemer K (2013) Malleable end-user software. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(3):195–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosson MB, Carroll JM (2002) Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human–computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoder D, Putzke J, Metaxas PT, Gloor PA, Fischbach K (2014) Information systems for “wicked problems”. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner I, Bratteteig T, Stuedahl D (2010) Exploring digital design. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wall TD, Corbett JM, Clegg CW, Jackson PR, Martin R (1990) Advanced manufacturing technology and work design: towards a theoretical framework. J Organ Behav 11(3):201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks L, Lacity M, Craig A (2017) Robotic process automation: strategic transformation lever for global business services? J Inf Technol Teach Cases 7(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortmann F, Flüchter K (2015) Internet of things. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(3):221–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author wants to thank Shahper Richter and Michael Koch for their feedback for this paper and their guidance in many other occasions. This study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement no. 636778.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Richter.

Additional information

Accepted after one revision by Prof. Dr. Weinhardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richter, A., Heinrich, P., Stocker, A. et al. Digital Work Design. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60, 259–264 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0534-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0534-4

Keywords

  • Digitalization
  • Industry 4.0
  • Human-centered design
  • Cyber-physical production system