Sharing Yet Caring

Mitigating Moral Hazard in Access-Based Consumption through IS-Enabled Value Co-Capturing with Consumers
Research Paper
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

The quest for creating smart and sustainable cities entails various substantial challenges, such as environmental degradation and a shortage of space. To negotiate these hurdles, innovative approaches must be implemented. A key aspect in this regard is the shared use of resources via forms of access-based consumption. Owing to advances in the digitalization of contemporary societies, these concepts have recently attracted both consumer and scholarly interest. However, the digitally enabled separation of ownership and use brings along the risk of moral hazard by consumers using resources in careless or wasteful ways, which is detrimental to the sustainability of the overall system. In this study, the authors conceptualize and empirically investigate how these adverse effects can be mitigated by applying the potentials of connectivity and digital data to enable users to participate economically while acting favorably from a collective perspective. The results of the quasi-experimental research design, situated in a carsharing context and comprising data records of 2,983 bookings, indicate that this form of value co-capturing with consumers can significantly motivate users to alter their behavior. From these findings, the authors derive important implications for research on the sustainability of digital business eco-systems in the specific context of smart cities.

Keywords

Access-based consumption Carsharing Smart cities Agency theory Value co-capture 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy for financing the project “e-Mobilität vorleben,” as the results of our study were generated within the context of this research project. In addition, our gratitude is due to Andreas Schmidt and Richard Schmidt for the excellent collaboration.

Supplementary material

12599_2018_532_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (224 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 225 kb)

References

  1. Adner R (2012) The wide lens: a new strategy for innovation. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. af Wåhlberg AE (2003) Stability and correlates of driver acceleration behavior. In: International Conference on Driver Behaviour and Training, pp 45–54Google Scholar
  3. af Wåhlberg AE (2006) Driver celeration behavior and the prediction of traffic accidents. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 12(3):281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. af Wåhlberg AE (2007) Long-term effects of training in economical driving: fuel consumption, accidents, driver acceleration behavior and technical feedback. Int J Ind Ergon 37(4):333–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agarwal R, Dhar V (2014) Editorial—big data, data science, and analytics: the opportunity and challenge for IS research. Inf Syst Res 25(3):443–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Almirall E, Wareham J, Ratti C, Conesa P, Bria F, Gaviria A, Edmondson A (2016) Smart cities at the crossroads: new tensions in city transformation. Calif Manag Rev 59(1):141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R (2010) On making causal claims: a review and recommendations. Leadersh Q 21(6):1086–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bardhi F, Eckhardt GM (2012) Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. J Consum Res 39(4):881–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belk R (2014) You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J Bus Res 67(8):1595–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belk RW, Costa JA (1998) The mountain man myth: a contemporary consuming fantasy. J Consum Res 25(3):218–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bharadwaj A, El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA, Venkatraman N (2013) Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Q 37(2):471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blohm I, Leimeister JM (2013) Design of IT-based enhancing services for motivational support and behavioral change. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(4):275–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bui A, Veit D (2015) The effects of gamification on driver behavior: an example from a free float carsharing service. In: ECIS 2015 Research-in-Progress Papers, pp 562–571Google Scholar
  14. Campbell DT, Stanley JC (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen B, Kietzmann J (2014) Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organ Environ 27(3):279–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corbett J, Mellouli S (2017) Winning the SDG battle in cities: how an integrated information ecosystem can contribute to the achievement of the 2030 sustainable development goals. Inf Syst J 27(4):427–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Desyllas P, Sako M (2013) Profiting from business model innovation: evidence from pay-as-you-drive auto insurance. Res Policy 42(1):101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dyal-Chand R (2015) Regulating sharing: the sharing economy as an alternative capitalist system. Tulane Law Rev 90(2):241–309Google Scholar
  19. Eisenhardt K (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14(1):57–74Google Scholar
  20. El Sawy OA, Pereira F (2013) Business modelling in the dynamic digital space. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elvik R (2014) Rewarding safe and environmentally sustainable driving: a systematic review of trials. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2465:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Firnkorn J, Müller M (2011) What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm. Ecol Econ 70(8):1519–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenwood ID, Bennett CR (1996) The effects of traffic congestion on fuel consumption. Road Transp Res 5(2):1–19Google Scholar
  24. Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J Econ Lit 42(4):1009–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hess T, Legner C, Esswein W, Maaß W, Matt C, Österle H, Schlieter H, Richter P, Zarnekow R (2014) Digital life as a topic of business and information systems engineering? Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(4):247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hildebrandt B, Hanelt A, Piccinini E, Kolbe L, Nierobisch T (2015) The value of IS in business model innovation for sustainable mobility services—the case of carsharing. In: International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp 1008–1022Google Scholar
  27. Hong Y, Wang C, Pavlou PA (2016) Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: evidence from online labor markets. Inf Syst Res 27:49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kathan W, Matzler K, Veider V (2016) The sharing economy: your business model’s friend or foe? Bus Horiz 59(6):663–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kesting A, Treiber M, Schönhof M, Helbing D (2008) Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance. Transp Res Part C 16(6):668–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leismann K, Schmitt M, Rohn H, Baedeker C (2013) Collaborative consumption: towards a resource-saving consumption culture. Resources 2:184–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lepak DP, Smith KG, Taylor MS (2007) Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective. Acad Manag Rev 32(1):180–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loock CM, Staake T, Thiesse F (2013) Motivating energy-efficient behavior with green IS: an investigation of goal setting and the role of defaults. MIS Q 37(4):1313–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lovelock C, Gummesson E (2004) Whither services marketing? In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. J Serv Res 7(1):20–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lucas HC, Agarwal R, Clemons EK, El Sawy OA, Weber B (2013) Impactful research on transformational information technology: an opportunity to inform new audiences. MIS Q 37(2):371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lusch RF, Nambisan S (2015) Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Q 39(1):155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Majchrzak A, Markus ML, Wareham J (2016) Designing for digital transformation: lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS Q 40(2):267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin CJ (2016) The sharing economy: a pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecol Econ 121:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin E, Shaheen SA, Lidicker J (2010) Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2143:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miao L, Wei W (2013) Consumers’ pro-environmental behavior and the underlying motivations: a comparison between household and hotel settings. Int J Hosp Manag 32:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: a principal-agent perspective. MIS Q 31(1):105–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Priem RL, Butler JE, Li S (2013) Toward reimagining strategy research: retrospection and prospection on the 2011 AMR decade award article. Acad Manag Rev 38(4):471–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Santos G, Maoh H, Potoglou D, von Brunn T (2013) Factors influencing modal split of commuting journeys in medium-size European cities. J Transp Geogr 30(1):127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sappington DEM (1991) Incentives in principal-agent relationships. J Econ Perspect 5(2):45–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schall DL, Mohnen A (2015) Incentives for energy-efficient behavior at the workplace: a natural field experiment on eco-driving in a company fleet. In: Energy Procedia, pp 2626–2634Google Scholar
  45. Schall DL, Wolf M, Mohnen A (2016) Do effects of theoretical training and rewards for energy-efficient behavior persist over time and interact? A natural field experiment on eco-driving in a company fleet. Energy Policy 97:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schieg M (2008) Strategies for avoiding asymmetric information in construction project management. J Bus Econ Manag 9(1):47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaheen S, Sperling D, Wagner C (1998) Carsharing in europe and north american: past, present, and future. Transp Q 52(3):35–52Google Scholar
  48. Shipman JE, Swanquist QT, Whited RL (2017) Propensity score matching in accounting research. Account Rev 92(1):213–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Siero S, Boon M, Kok G, Siero F (1989) Modification of driving behavior in a large transport organization: a field experiment. J Appl Psychol 74(3):417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snow CC, Håkonsson DD, Obel B (2016) A smart city is a collaborative community: lessons from smart aarhus. Calif Manag Rev 59(1):92–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stocker A, Kaiser C, Fellmann M (2017) Quantified vehicles. Bus Inf Syst Eng 59(2):125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Teubner T, Flath CM (2015) The economics of multi-hop ride sharing: creating new mobility networks through IS. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(5):311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tiefenbeck V, Goette L, Degen K, Tasic V, Fleisch E, Lalive R, Staake T (2016) Overcoming salience bias: how real-time feedback fosters resource conservation. Manag Sci (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  54. Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Research commentary—digital infrastructures: the missing IS research agenda. Inf Syst Res 21(4):748–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tulusan J, Steggers H, Staake T, Fleisch E (2012) Supporting eco-driving with eco-feedback technologies: Recommendations targeted at improving corporate car drivers’ intrinsic motivation to drive more sustainable. All Sprouts ContentGoogle Scholar
  56. Veit D, Clemons E, Benlian A, Buxmann P, Hess T, Spann M, Kundisch D, Leimeister JM, Loos P (2014) Business models: an information systems research agenda. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wagner S, Brandt T, Kleinknecht M, Neumann D (2014) In free-float: How decision analytics paves the way for the carsharing revolution. In: 37th International Conference on Information SystemsGoogle Scholar
  58. Willing C, Brandt T, Neumann D (2016) Sharing is caring – understanding the relationship between the sharing economy and sustainable mobility. In: 37th International Conference on Information SystemsGoogle Scholar
  59. Willing C, Brandt T, Neumann D (2017) Intermodal mobility. Bus Inf Syst Eng 59(3):173–179Google Scholar
  60. Yoo YJ (2010) Computing in everyday life: a call for research on experiential computing. MIS Q 34(2):213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yoo YJ, Bryant A, Wigand RT (2010) Designing digital communities that transform urban life: introduction to the special section on digital cities. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 27(33):637–640Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Björn Hildebrandt
    • 1
  • Andre Hanelt
    • 1
  • Sebastian Firk
    • 2
  1. 1.Chair of Information ManagementUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Management and ControlUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations