Business & Information Systems Engineering

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 3–21 | Cite as

Towards a Conceptualization of Data and Information Quality in Social Information Systems

  • Roman Tilly
  • Oliver Posegga
  • Kai Fischbach
  • Detlef Schoder
Research Paper

Abstract

Data and information quality (DIQ) have been defined traditionally in an organizational context and with respect to traditional information systems (IS). Numerous frameworks have been developed to operationalize traditional DIQ accordingly. However, over the last decade, social information systems (SocIS) such as social media have emerged that enable social interaction and open collaboration of voluntary prosumers, rather than supporting specific tasks as do traditional IS in organizations. Based on a systematic literature review, the paper identifies and categorizes prevalent DIQ conceptualizations. The authors differentiate the various understandings of DIQ in light of the unique characteristics of SocIS and conclude that they do not capture DIQ in SocIS well, nor how it is defined, maintained, and improved through social interaction. The paper proposes a new conceptualization of DIQ in SocIS that can explain the interplay of existing conceptualizations and provides the foundation for future research on DIQ in SocIS.

Keywords

Social information systems Social media Data quality Information quality Socio-technical processes 

References

  1. Agarwal R, Gupta AK, Kraut R (2008) The interplay between digital and social networks. Inf Syst Res 19:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali-Hassan H, Nevo D (2009) Identifying social computing dimensions: a multidimensional scaling study. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information systems (ICIS) 2009Google Scholar
  3. Arazy O, Nov O, Patterson R, Yeo L (2011) Information quality in Wikipedia: the effects of group composition and task conflict. J Manag Inf Syst 27:71–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Association for Information Systems (2011) Senior scholars’ basket of journals. In: Res. – Assoc. Inf. Syst. http://aisnet.org/?SeniorScholarBasket. Accessed 28 Apr 2015
  5. Bagozzi RP, Dholakia UM (2002) Intentional social action in virtual communities. J Interact Mark 16:2–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballou D, Madnick S, Wang R (2003) Special section: assuring information quality. J Manag Inf Syst 20:9–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bansal A, Kauffman RJ, Weitz RR (1993) Comparing the modeling performance of regression and neural networks as data quality varies: a business value approach. J Manag Inf Syst 10:11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bardaki C, Kourouthanassis P, Pramatari K, Doukidis G (2013) An information quality evaluation framework of object tracking systems. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information systems (ICIS) 2013Google Scholar
  9. Barnes S, Vidgen R (2009) An evaluation of user acceptance of a corporate intranet. In: Proceedings of the european conference on information systems (ECIS) 2009Google Scholar
  10. Boell SK, Cecez-Kecmanovic D (2015) What is an information system? In: Proceedings of the annual hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) 2015Google Scholar
  11. Butler BS (2001) Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: a resource-based model of online social structures. Inf Syst Res 12:346–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chai K, Potdar V, Dillon T (2009) Content quality assessment related frameworks for social media. In: Proc Int Conf Comput Sci its Appl ICCSA 09, pp. 791–805Google Scholar
  13. Cheong LK, Chang V (2007) The need for data governance: a case study. In: Proceedings of the australasian conference on information systems (ACIS) 2007Google Scholar
  14. DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res 3:60–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19:9–30Google Scholar
  16. Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G (1988) The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Q 12:259–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. English LP (1999) Improving data warehouse and business information quality: methods for reducing costs and increasing profits. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Floridi L (2011) The philosophy of information. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fung R, Lee M (1999) EC-Trust (trust in electronic commerce): exploring the antecedent factors. In: Proceedings of the Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS) 1999Google Scholar
  20. Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438:900–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glowalla P, Sunyaev A (2014) Process-driven data quality management: a critical review on the application of process modeling languages. ACM J Data Inf Qual 5:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gu B, Konana P, Rajagopalan B, Chen H-WM (2007) Competition among virtual communities and user valuation: the case of investing-related communities. Inf Syst Res 18:68–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen P, Järvelin K (2000) The information seeking and retrieval process at the Swedish patent- and registration office. Moving from lab-based to real life work-task environment. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR 2000 workshop on patent retrieval, pp 43–53Google Scholar
  24. Hansen P, Järvelin K (2004) Collaborative information searching in an information-intensive work domain: preliminary results. J Digit Inf Manag 2:26–30Google Scholar
  25. Hirschheim R, Klein HK (2012) A glorious and not-so-short history of the information systems field. J Assoc Inf Syst 13:188–235Google Scholar
  26. Hoyle D (2006) ISO 9000 Quality systems handbook, 5th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Illari P (2014) IQ: Purpose and DIMENSIONS. In: Floridi L, Illari P (eds) The philosophy of information quality. Springer, Cham, pp 281–301Google Scholar
  28. Jayawardene V, Sadiq S, Indulska M (2013) An analysis of data quality dimensions. IEEE Tech Rep No. 2013–01Google Scholar
  29. Juran JM, Godfrey AB (eds) (1999) Juran’s quality handbook, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Juran JM, Gryna FM, Bingham RS (eds) (1974) Quality control handbook, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahn BK, Strong DM (1998) Product and service performance model for information quality: an update. In: Proceedings of the 1998 conference on information qualityGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahn BK, Strong DM, Wang RY (2002) Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance. Commun ACM 45:184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kane GC, Ransbotham S (2012) Codification and collaboration: information quality in social media. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information systems (ICIS) 2012Google Scholar
  34. Kane GC, Alavi M, Labianca GJ, Borgatti SP (2014) What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MIS Q 38:275–304Google Scholar
  35. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 53:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kitchenham B (2004) Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Department of Computer Science, Keele University and National ICT Australia Ltd, KeeleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kitchenham B, Charters S (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report, Keele and DurhamGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee AS (2010) Retrospect and prospect: information systems research in the last and next 25 years. J Inf Technol 25:336–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee YW, Strong DM, Kahn BK, Wang RY (2002) AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment. Inf Manag 40:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lili L, Rong D (2013) Roles of community commitment and community atmosphere: an empirical study of online community success. In: Proceedings of the Wuhan international conference on E-business (WHICEB) 2013Google Scholar
  41. Link S, Memari M (2013) Static analysis of partial referential integrity for better quality SQL data. In: Proceedings of the americas conference on information systems (AMCIS) 2013Google Scholar
  42. Lukyanenko R, Parsons J, Wiersma YF (2014a) The IQ of the crowd: understanding and improving information quality in structured user-generated content. Inf Syst Res 25:669–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lukyanenko R, Parsons J, Wiersma YF (2014b) The impact of conceptual modeling on dataset completeness: a field experiment. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information systems (ICIS) 2014Google Scholar
  44. Ma M, Agarwal R (2007) Through a glass darkly: information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inf Syst Res 18:42–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacInnis DJ (2011) A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. J Mark 75:136–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Madnick SE, Wang RY, Lee YW, Zhu H (2009) Overview and framework for data and information quality research. ACM J Data Inf Qual 1:1–2Google Scholar
  47. Mason RO, Mitroff II (1973) A program for research on management information systems. Manag Sci 19:475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKenzie P (2003) A model of information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking. J Doc 59:19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morris CW (1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. In: International encyclopedia of unified science. University of Chicago Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Nickerson RC, Varshney U, Muntermann J (2012) A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 22:336–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orr K (1998) Data quality and systems theory. Commun ACM 41:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ou CXJ, Davison RM, Cheng NCK (2011) Why are social networking applications successful: an empirical study of Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Asia conference on information system (PACIS) 2011Google Scholar
  53. Parameswaran M, Whinston AB (2007a) Social computing: an overview. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 19:762–780Google Scholar
  54. Parameswaran M, Whinston AB (2007b) Research issues in social computing. J Assoc Inf Syst 8:336–350Google Scholar
  55. Peirce CS (1931) Collected papers. Harv Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Prestipino M, Aschoff F-R, Schwabe G (2006) What’s the use of guidebooks in the age of collaborative media? Empirical evaluation of free and commercial travel information. In: Proceedings of the Bled eConference (BLED) 2006Google Scholar
  57. Price R, Shanks G (2005) A semiotic information quality framework: development and comparative analysis. J Inf Technol 20:88–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rai A, Lang SS, Welker RB (2002) Assessing the validity of is success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inf Syst Res 13:50–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rheingold H (1993) The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  60. Rotchanakitumnuai S (2006) Developing the electronic service acceptance model from internet securities trading system. In: Proceedings of the australian conference on information systems (ACIS) 2006Google Scholar
  61. Sadiq S, Yeganeh NK, Indulska M (2011) 20 years of data quality research: themes, trends and synergies. In: Proceedings of the Australasian database conference (ADC) 2011, pp 153–162Google Scholar
  62. Schlagwein D, Schoder D, Fischbach K (2011) Social information systems: review, framework, and research agenda. In: Research-in-progress, proceedings of the international conference on information systems (ICIS) 2011Google Scholar
  63. Scholz M, Dorner V (2013) The recipe for the perfect review? An investigation into the determinants of review helpfulness. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Seddon PB (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf Syst Res 8:240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shanks G, Corbitt B (1999) Understanding data quality: SOCIAL and cultural aspects. In: Proceedings of the Australasian conference on information systems (ACIS) 1999. pp 785–797Google Scholar
  66. Shanks G, Darke P (1998) Understanding data quality in data warehousing: a semiotic approach. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information quality (ICIQ) 1998Google Scholar
  67. Stamper R (1992) Signs, organisations, norms and information systems. In: Proceedings of the Australian conference on information systems (ACIS) 1992Google Scholar
  68. Strong DM, Lee YW, Wang RY (1997) Data quality in context. Commun ACM 40:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Talja S (2002) Information sharing in academic communities: types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. New Rev Inf Behav Res 3:143–160Google Scholar
  70. Talja S, Hansen P (2006) Information sharing. In: Cole C (ed) Spink A. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 113–134Google Scholar
  71. Valecha R, Oh O, Rao R (2013) An exploration of collaboration over time in collective crisis response during the Haiti 2010 earthquake. In: Research-in-progress, proceedings of the international conference on information system (ICIS) 2013Google Scholar
  72. van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q 28:695–704Google Scholar
  73. van der Pijl G (1994) Measuring the strategic dimensions of the quality of information. J Strateg Inf Syst 3:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wand Y, Wang RY (1996) Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Commun ACM 39:86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang RY (1998) A product perspective on total data quality management. Commun ACM 41:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang RW, Strong DM (1996) Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J Manag Inf Syst 12:5–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weber D, Leone S, Norrie M (2013) Constraint-based data quality management framework for object databases. In: Proceedings of the European conference on information systems (ECIS) 2013Google Scholar
  78. Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q 26:xiii–xxiiiGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilson TD (2000) Human information behavior. Inf Sci J 3:49–55Google Scholar
  80. Winter S, Berente N, Howison J, Butler B (2014) Beyond the organizational “container”: conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work. Inf Organ 24:250–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wixom BH, Todd PA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf Syst Res 16:85–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Xiao Y, Lu LYY, Liu JS, Zhou Z (2014) Knowledge diffusion path analysis of data quality literature: a main path analysis. J Informetr 8:594–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Xu YC, Yang Y, Cheng Z, Lim J (2014) Retaining and attracting users in social networking services: an empirical investigation of cyber migration. J Strateg Inf Syst 23:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zach O (2011) Exploring ERP system outcomes in SMEs: a multiple case study. In: Proceedings of the european conference on information systems (ECIS) 2011Google Scholar
  85. Zheng Y, Zhao K, Stylianou A (2009) Information quality and system quality in online communities: an empirical investigation. In: Proceedings of the special interest group on human computer interaction (SIGHCI) 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roman Tilly
    • 1
  • Oliver Posegga
    • 2
  • Kai Fischbach
    • 2
  • Detlef Schoder
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems and Information ManagementUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.Department of Information Systems and Social NetworksUniversity of BambergBambergGermany

Personalised recommendations