Business & Information Systems Engineering

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 415–432 | Cite as

On the Ex Ante Valuation of IT Service Investments

A Decision Theoretical Perspective
  • Hans Ulrich Buhl
  • Björn Steven Häckel
  • Florian Probst
  • Josef Schosser
Research Paper

Abstract

The paradigm of service orientation and its incarnation in the form of service-oriented architecture (SOA) and information technology (IT) services play a crucial role in enabling companies to achieve considerable competitive advantages. However, to be able to leverage the opportunities of SOA and IT services, companies need to gain a thorough understanding of the business value of IT service investments. Nevertheless, research on IT services has focused mainly on technical questions so far; the economic perspective largely has been neglected. Therefore, the authors aim to contribute to the ex ante valuation of IT service investments from a decision theoretical point of view. Using decision theory as a theoretical base, the main aim is to identify and discuss specific challenges regarding the financial ex ante valuation of IT service investments, which arise from the inherent flexibility of IT services and the various interdependencies within a company’s IT service portfolio. The authors thereby emphasize that the application of common methods from financial theory for valuating IT service investments has to be treated with caution, as these methods are often tied to rather restrictive assumptions based on the specifics of capital markets. By analyzing different clusters of IT service investment decision problems using decision theory, the authors identify and discuss pitfalls that might occur when applying financial valuation methods to capture the flexibility and interdependencies of IT service investments. The decision theoretical considerations are intended to help build a solid basis for future multi-criteria valuation approaches, of which an essential component is a theoretically well-founded financial valuation.

Keywords

Decision theory Dynamic decision structure Intratemporal interdependencies Intertemporal interdependencies IT service investments 

References

  1. Abelein U, Habryn F, Becker A (2009) Towards a holistic framework for describing and evaluating business benefits of a service oriented architecture (SOA). In: Proceedings of the 13th enterprise distributed object computing conference, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  2. Alshawi S, Irani Z, Baldwin LP (2003) Benchmarking information technology investment and benefits extraction. Benchmarking 10(4):414–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angell IO, Smithson S (1991) Appraisal, monitoring and control. information systems management: opportunities and risks. MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 189–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ Sci 18(5):763–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrow KJ (1965) Aspects of the theory of risk bearing. Yrjö Jahnsson lectures, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  6. Asundi J, Kazman R (2001) A foundation for the economic analysis of software architectures. In: Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on economics-driven software engineering research, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayal M, Seidmann A (2009) An empirical investigation of the value of integrating enterprise information systems: the case of medical imaging informatics. J Manag Inf Syst 26(2):43–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balasubramanian P, Kulatilaka N, Storck J (2000) Managing information technology investments using a real-options approach. J Strateg Inf Syst 9(1):39–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bamberg G, Krapp M (2016) Is time consistency compatible with risk aversion? Rev Manag Sci 10(2):195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bamberg G, Spremann K (1981) Implications of constant risk aversion. Z Oper Res 25(7):205–224Google Scholar
  11. Bamberg G, Dorfleitner G, Krapp M (2006) Unternehmensbewertung unter Unsicherheit: Zur entscheidungstheoretischen Fundierung der Risikoanalyse. Z Betriebswirtschaft 76(3):287–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baskerville R, Cavallari M, Hjort-Madsen K, Pries-Heje J, Sorrentino M, Virili F (2005) Extensible architectures: the strategic value of service-oriented architecture in banking. In: Proceedings of the 13th European conference on information systems, RegensburgGoogle Scholar
  13. Becker A, Widjaja T, Buxmann P (2011) Value potentials and challenges of service-oriented architectures. Results of an empirical survey from user and vendor perspective. Bus Inf Syst Eng 3(4):199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beimborn D, Joachim N, Weitzel T (2008) Drivers and inhibitors of SOA business value - conceptualizing a research model. In: Proceedings of the 14th Americas conference on information systems, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  15. Benaroch M, Kauffman RJ (1999) A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments. Inf Syst Res 10(1):70–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Benaroch M, Jeffery M, Kauffman R, Shah S (2007) Option-based risk management: a field study of sequential information technology investment decisions. J Manag Inf Syst 24(2):103–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bharadwaj A, Bharadwaj SG, Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Manag Sci 45(7):1008–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Political Econ 81(3):637–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boell SK, Cecez-Kecmanovic D (2014) A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Commun AIS 34(1):257–286Google Scholar
  20. Bradley A (2008) Finding the business value in SOA: a business case framework. In: Symposium/ITxpo 2008, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  21. Brandl R, Bichler M, Ströbel M (2007) Cost accounting for shared IT infrastructures estimating resource utilization in distributed IT architectures. Wirtschaftsinformatik 49(2):83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Braunwarth KS, Friedl B (2010) Towards a financially optimal design of IT services. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on information systems, St LouisGoogle Scholar
  23. Braunwarth KS, Heinrich B (2008) IT-Service-Management - Ein Modell zur Bestimmung der Folgen von Interoperabilitätsstandards auf die Einbindung externer IT-Dienstleister. Wirtschaftsinformatik 50(2):98–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1995) Information technology as a factor of production: the role of differences among firms. Econ Innov New Technol 3(4):183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Buhl HU, Röglinger M, Stöckl S, Braunwarth KS (2011) Value orientation in process management. Bus Inf Syst Eng 3(3):163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chau PYK, Kuan KKY, Liang TP (2007) Research on IT value: what we have done in Asia and Europe. Eur J Inf Syst 16(3):196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cho W, Shaw MJ (2009) Does IT synergy matter in IT portfolio selection? In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on information systems, PhoenixGoogle Scholar
  28. Cho W, Shaw MJ (2013) Portfolio selection model for enhancing information technology synergy. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 60(4):739–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Choi J, Nazareth DL, Jain HK (2010) Implementing service-oriented architecture in organizations. J Manag Inf Syst 26(4):253–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cochrane JH (2005) Asset pricing. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Coenenberg A, Salfeld R (2003) Wertorientierte Unternehmensführung. Schäffer-Poeschel, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  32. Copeland TE, Weston JF, Shastri K (2008) Financial theory and corporate policy. Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  33. Cui X, Li D, Wang S, Zhu S (2012) Better than dynamic mean - variance: time inconsistency and free cash flow stream. Math Finance 22(2):346–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Davis GA (2002) The impact of volatility on firms holding growth options. Eng Econ 47(2):213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. DeAngelo H (1981) Competition and unanimity. Am Econ Rev 71(1):18–27Google Scholar
  36. Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer KL (2003) Information technology and economic performance: a critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput Surv 35(1):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dehning B, Richardson VJ (2002) Returns on investments in information technology: a research synthesis. J Inf Syst 16(1):7–30Google Scholar
  38. Dewan S, Min CK (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a firm level analysis. Manag Sci 43(12):1660–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Diao Y, Bhattacharya K (2008) Estimating business value of IT services through process complexity analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE/IFIP network operation and management symposium, Salvador de BahiaGoogle Scholar
  40. Diepold D, Ullrich C, Wehrmann A, Zimmermann S (2011) Bewertung intertemporaler Abhängigkeiten zwischen IT-Projekten: Anwendung eines realoptionsbasierten Ansatzes unter Berücksichtigung projektspezifischer Risiken. Z Betriebswirtschaft 81(7/8):805–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dos Santos BL, Peffers KG, Mauer DC (1993) The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Inf Syst Res 4(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dutta A (2004) Putting numbers on intangible benefits. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on information systems, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  43. Fichman RG (2004) Real options and IT platform adoption: implications for theory and practice. Inf Syst Res 15(2):132–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fridgen G, Moser F (2013) Using IT fashion investments to optimize an IT innovation portfolio’s risk and return. J Decis Syst 22(4):298–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Geman H, Ohana S (2008) Time-consistency in managing a commodity portfolio: a dynamic risk measure approach. J Bank Finance 32(10):1991–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ghosh S, Li X (2013) A real options model for generalized meta-staged projects - valuing the migration to SOA. Inf Syst Res 24(4):1011–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Grefen P, Ludwig H, Dan A, Angelov S (2006) An analysis of web services support for dynamic business process outsourcing. Inf Softw Technol 48(11):1115–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Häckel B, Hänsch F (2014) Managing an IT portfolio on a synchronized level or: the costs of partly synchronized investment valuation. J Decis Syst 23(4):388–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Häckel B, Hänsch F, Isakovic V (2011) Langfristige versus periodische IT-Investitionsbewertung im Rahmen einer wertorientierten Unternehmensführung. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on wirtschaftsinformatik, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  50. Han K, Chang YB, Hahn J (2011) Information technology spillover and productivity: the role of information technology intensity and competition. J Manag Inf Syst 28(1):115–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hares J, Royle D (1994) Measuring the value of information technology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Harmantzis FC, Tanguturi VP (2007) Investment decisions in the wireless industry applying real options. Telecommun Policy 31(2):107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Heffner R, Leganza J, Czarnecki M (2009) SOA is far from dead - but it should be buried. Forrester ResearchGoogle Scholar
  54. Hirshleifer J (1965) Investment decision under uncertainty: choice-theoretic approaches. Q J Econ 79(4):509–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Q 20(2):121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Irani Z (2010) Investment evaluation within project management: an information systems perspective. J Oper Res Soc 61(6):917–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Irani Z, Love PED (2002) Developing a frame of reference for ex-ante IT/IS investment valuation. Eur J Inf Syst 11(1):74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Joachim N (2011) A literature review of research on service-oriented architectures (SOA): characteristics, adoption determinants, governance mechanisms, and business impact. In: Proceedings of the 17th Americas conference on information systems, Detroit, paper 339Google Scholar
  59. Joachim N, Beimborn D, Weitzel T (2013) The influence of SOA governance mechanisms on IT flexibility and service reuse. J Strateg Inf Syst 22:86–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kaczmarek T, Wecel K (2008) Hype over service oriented architecture continues. Wirtschaftsinformatik 50(1):52–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kauffman RJ, Li X (2005) Technology competition and optimal investment timing: a real options perspective. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 52(1):15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. King WR, He J (2005) Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Commun AIS 16(1):665–686Google Scholar
  63. Klischewski R, Abubakr R (2010) Can e-government adopters benefit from a technology-first approach? The case of Egypt embarking on service-oriented architecture. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  64. Kohlborn T, Korthaus A, Taizan C, Rosemann M (2009) Identification and analysis of business and software services - a consolidated approach. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 2(1):50–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kohli R, Grover V (2008) Business value of IT: an essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. J Assoc Inf Syst 9(1):23–39Google Scholar
  66. Kontogiannis K, Lewis G, Smith D (2007) The landscape of service-oriented systems: a research perspective for maintenance and reengineering. In: Proceedings of the workshop on service-oriented architecture maintenance, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  67. Krammer A, Heinrich B, Henneberger M, Lautenbacher F (2011) Granularity of services. An economic analysis. Bus Inf Syst Eng 3(6):345–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kumar S, Dakshinamoorth V, Krishnan M (2007) Does SOA improve the supply chain? An empirical analysis of the impact of SOA adoption on electronic supply chain performance. In: Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  69. Kundisch D, Meier M (2011) IT/IS project portfolio selection in the presence of project interactions - review and synthesis of the literature. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on wirtschaftsinformatik, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  70. Lee S, XiangJY Kim JK (2011) Information technology and productivity: empirical evidence from the Chinese electronics industry. Inf Manag 48(2/3):79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Levy Y, Ellis TJ (2006) A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Inf Sci J 9:181–212Google Scholar
  72. Li X (2009) Preemptive learning, competency traps, and information technology: a real options analysis. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 56(4):650–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lintner J (1965) The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev Econ Stat 47(1):13–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Luthria H, Rabhi F (2009) Using service oriented computing for competitive advantage. In: Proceedings of the 15th Americas conference on information systems, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  75. Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  76. Mata FJ, Fuerst WL, Barney JB (1995) Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Q 19(4):487–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q 28(2):283–322Google Scholar
  78. Millard DE, Howard Y, Abbas N, Davis HC, Gilbert L, Wills GB, Walters RJ (2009) Pragmatic web service design: an agile approach with the service responsibility and interaction design method. Comput Sci Res Dev 24(4):173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Moitra D, Ganesh J (2005) Web services and flexible business processes: towards the adaptive enterprise. Inf Manag 42(7):921–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Müller B, Viering G, Ahlemann F, Riempp G (2007) Towards understanding the sources of the economic potential of service-oriented architecture: findings from the automotive and banking industry. In: Proceedings of the 15th European conference on information systems, St. GallenGoogle Scholar
  81. Murphy KE, Simon SJ (2001) Using cost benefit analysis for enterprise resource planning project evaluation: a case for including intangibles. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  82. Oh LB, Leong YX, Teo HH, Ravichandran T (2007) Service-oriented architecture and organizational integration: an empirical study of IT-enabled sustained competitive advantage. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on information systems, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  83. Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research. A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf Syst Res 12(2):121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Papazoglou MP (2008) Service-oriented computing: a research roadmap. Int J Coop Inf Syst 17(2):223–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Peacock E, Tanniru M (2005) Activity-based justification of IT investments. Inf Manag 42:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 30(1/2):122–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Probst F, Buhl HU (2012) Supplier portfolio management for IT services considering diversification effects. Bus Inf Syst Eng 4(2):71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rai A, Sambamurthy V (2006) Editorial notes - the growth of interest in service management: opportunities for information systems scholars. Inf Syst Res 17(4):327–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N (1997) Technology investment and business performance. Commun ACM 40(7):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Renkema TJW, Berghout EW (1997) Methodologies for information systems investment evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review. Inf Softw Technol 39(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ross JW, Beath CM (2002) Beyond the business case: new approaches to IT investment. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 43(2):51–59Google Scholar
  92. Rowe F (2014) What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. Eur J Inf Syst 23:241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Schelp J, Winter R (2007) Towards a methodology for service construction. In: Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  94. Schryen G (2013) Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there. Eur J Inf Syst 22(2):139–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Schryen G, Bodenstein C (2010) A decision-theoretic foundation of IS business value research. In: Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  96. Schwartz EJ, Zozaya-Gorostiza C (2003) Investment under uncertainty in information technology: acquisition and development projects. Manag Sci 49(1):57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Schwarz A, Mehta M, Johnson N, Chin W (2007) Understanding frameworks and reviews: a commentary to assist us in moving our field forward by analyzing our past. Data Base Adv Inf Syst 38(3):29–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Finance 19(3):425–442Google Scholar
  99. Sircar S, Turnbow JL, Bordoloi B (2000) A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. J Manag Inf Syst 16(4):69–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Smith JE, Nau RF (1995) Valuing risky projects: option pricing theory and decision analysis. Manag Sci 41(5):795–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Soh C, Markus ML (1995) How IT creates business value: a process theory synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on information systems, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  102. Strotz RH (1955) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev Econ Stud 23(3):165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sylla C, Wen HJ (2002) A conceptual framework for evaluation of information technology investments. Int J Technol Manag 24(2–3):236–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tewary K, Kosalge P, Motwani J (2009) Piloting service oriented architecture: a case study in the oil industry. In: Proceedings of the 15th Americas conference on information systems, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  105. Thomas O, vom Brocke J (2010) A value-driven approach to the design of service oriented information systems - making use of conceptual models. Inf Syst E Bus Manag 8(1):67–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Trkman P, Kovacic A, Popovic A (2011) SOA adoption phases: a case study. Bus Inf Syst Eng 3(4):211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Ullrich C (2013) Valuation of IT investments using real options theory. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(5):331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Verhoef C (2002) Quantitative IT portfolio management. Sci Comput Program 45(1):1–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Verhoef C (2005) Quantifying the value of IT-investments. Sci Comput Program 56(1):315–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Viering G, Legner C, Ahlemann F (2009) The (lacking) business perspective on SOA - critical themes in SOA research. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on wirtschaftsinformatik, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  111. vom Brocke J, Sonnenberg C (2007) Serviceorientiertes Prozesscontrolling - Unternehmensindividuelle Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnungen zur Nutzung serviceorientierter Architekturen bei der Prozessgestaltung. In: Nissen V, Petsch M, Schorcht H (eds) Service-orientierte Architekturen: Chancen und Herausforderungen bei der Flexibilisierung und Integration von Unternehmensprozessen. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 185–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. vom Brocke J, Sonnenberg C, Thomas O (2008) Towards an economic justification of service oriented architectures - measuring the financial impact. In: Proceedings of the 14th Americas conference on information systems, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  113. vom Brocke J, Sonnenberg C, Simons A (2009) Value-oriented information systems design: the concept of potentials modelling and its application to service-oriented architectures. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(3):223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  115. Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future. Writing a literature review. MIS Q 26(2):xiii–xxiiiGoogle Scholar
  116. Wehrmann A, Heinrich B, Seifert F (2006) Quantitatives IT-Portfoliomanagement: Risiken von IT-Investitionen wertorientiert steuern. Wirtschaftsinformatik 48(4):234–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wilhelm J (1989) On stakeholders’ unanimity. In: Bamberg G, Spremann K (eds) Agency theory, information, and incentives. Springer, Berlin, pp 179–204Google Scholar
  118. Zimmermann S (2008a) Governance im IT Portfoliomanagement - Ein Ansatz zur Berücksichtigung von Strategic Alignment bei der Bewertung von IT. Wirtschaftsinformatik 50(5):357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Zimmermann S (2008b) IT-Portfoliomanagement - Ein Konzept zur Bewertung und Gestaltung von IT. Inf Spektrum 31(5):460–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zimmermann S, Katzmarzik A, Kundisch D (2012) IT sourcing portfolio management for IT services providers - an approach for using modern portfolio theory to allocate software development projects to available sites. Data Base Adv Inf Syst 43(1):24–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Ulrich Buhl
    • 1
  • Björn Steven Häckel
    • 1
  • Florian Probst
    • 1
  • Josef Schosser
    • 2
  1. 1.FIM Research Center Finance & Information ManagementAugsburg UniversityAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Business Administration and EconomicsUniversity of PassauPassauGermany

Personalised recommendations