Skip to main content

The Impact of Process Visibility on Process Performance

A Multiple Case Study of Operations Control Centers in ITSM

Business & Information Systems Engineering volume 58, pages 31–42 (2016)Cite this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Successful monitoring is essential for managing security-critical or business-critical processes. The paper seeks to understand and empirically evaluate benefits of the BPM use case “monitor” in the context of Operations Control Centers (OCCs). OCCs create visibility about critical events and statuses in very sensitive processes. In IT Service Management (ITSM) they support the event management process with real-time monitoring and event analysis of critical systems in complex system landscapes. This special focus of OCCs on visibility is a promising context to study fundamentals of process visibility. The paper develops a Process Monitoring Benefits Framework that draws on the Situation Awareness Theory and the Theory of Constraints. The authors conceptualize process visibility and suggest that it is positively related to process performance. A multiple case study in seven organizations is carried out to examine the framework and its propositions. The case study indicates that the impact of process visibility on process performance is mediated by the situation awareness of the process participants as well as the identification of bottlenecks in processes. Moreover, factors are identified that potentially influence process visibility outcome – namely continuous improvement culture, outsourcing quality, and maturity of the software tool used for monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Barratt M, Oke A (2007) Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: a resource-based theory perspective. J Oper Manag 25(6):1217–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner M, Graupner E, Maedche A, Mueller B (2012) Process visibility – towards a conceptualization and research themes. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2012), pp 1–13

  • Cater-Steel A, McBride N (2007) IT service management improvement – actor network perspective. In: ECIS 2007 Proceedings. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2007), pp 1202–1213

  • Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotteleer MJ, Bendoly E (2006) Order lead-time improvement following enterprise information technology implementation: an empirical study. MIS Q 30(3):643–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Havard Business School Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • de Morais RM, Kazan S, de Pádua SID, Costa AL (2014) An analysis of BPM lifecycles: from a literature review to a framework proposal. Bus Process Manag J 20(3):412–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):9–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibbern J, Winkler J, Heinzl A (2008) Explaning variations in client extra costs between software projects offshored to India. MIS Q 32(2):333–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubé L, Paré G (2003) Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Q 27(4):597–635

    Google Scholar 

  • EMC (2012) EMC Ionix ControlCenter. http://www.emc.com/collateral/TechnicalDocument/docu7670.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2015

  • Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. J Hum Factors 37(1):32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galup SD, Dattero R (2010) A five-step method to tune your ITSM processes. Inf Syst Manag 27(2):156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner (2012) Gartner says intelligent business operations is the next step for BPM programs. http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1943514. Accessed 20 Oct 2015

  • Goldratt E, Cox J (1992) The goal: a process of ongoing improvement, 2nd edn. North River, Great Barrington

    Google Scholar 

  • Graupner E, Berner M, Maedche A, Jegadeesan H (2014) Assessing the need for visibility of business processes – a process visibility fit framework. In: Proceedings of Business Process Management Conference BPM 2014. Springer LNCS 8659, pp 384–392

  • Hogg DN, Folles K, Strand-Volden F, Torralba B (1995) Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plant control rooms. Ergonomics 38(11):2394–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti OR (1969) Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Iden J, Eikebrokk TR (2013) Implementing IT service management: a systematic literature review. Int J Inf Manag 33(3):512–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassarjian HH (1977) Content analysis in consumer research. J Consum Res 4(1):8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klotz L, Horman M, Bi HH, Bechtel J (2008) The impact of process mapping on transparency. Int J Product Perform Manag 57(8):623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyika J, Chui M, Brown B et al (2011) Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez H (2009) How much does downtime really cost? InfoManagement Direct, August 6, 2009. http://www.information-management.com/infodirect/2009_133/downtime_cost-10015855-1.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2015

  • McCombs BL, Marzano RJ (1990) Putting the self in self-regulated learning: the self as agent in integrating will and skill. Educ Psychol 25(1):51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q 28(2):283–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers MD, Newman M (2007) The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf Organ 17(1):2–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Todd PA, Wixom BH (2005) Antecedents of information and system quality: an empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. J Manag Inf Syst 21(4):199–235

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien KS, O’Harea D (2007) Situational awareness ability and cognitive skills training in a complex real-world task. Ergonomics 50(7):1064–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OGC (2007a) ITIL Service strategy, Version 3. Office of Government Commerce, London

    Google Scholar 

  • OGC (2007b) Continual service improvement, Version 3. Office of Government Commerce, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidun T, Buder J, Felden C (2011) Optimizing process performance visibility through additional descriptive features in performance measurement. In: 15th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops. IEEE Computer Society, pp 204–212

  • Ray G, Muhanna WA, Barney JB (2005) Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: a resource-based analysis. MIS Q 29(4):625–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Russom P (2013) Operational intelligence: real-time business analytics from big data. TDWI Checkl Rep 1–8

  • SAP (2013) Operations control center. White Paper. https://documents.wdf.sap.corp/share/proxy/alfresco//api/node/content/workspace/SpacesStore/94863204-455e-41a1-865e-4924d4aafe8e/OCC%20White%20Paper%20v1.0.pdf?a=true. Accessed 20 Oct 2015

  • Schein EH (2004) Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Shingo S (1989) A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint. Productivity Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan MJ, Tayur SR (2003) Models for supply chains in e-business. Manag Sci 49(10):1387–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlay A, John P (2009) Determining the lines of system maturity, system readiness and capability readiness in the system development lifecycle. In: 7th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER 2009), pp 1–8

  • van der Aalst WMP (2013) Business process management: a comprehensive survey. ISRN Softw Eng 2013:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack JP, Jones DT (2003) Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli RT (2013) Integrating service quality with system and information quality: an empirical test in the e-service context. MIS Q 37(3):777–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2003) Case study research, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Enterprise Systems (InES), University of Mannheim, L15, 1-6, 68131, Mannheim, Germany

    Martin Berner, Jino Augustine & Alexander Maedche

  2. Institute of Information Systems and Marketing (IISM), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Fritz-Erler-Straße 23, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Alexander Maedche

Authors
  1. Martin Berner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jino Augustine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Maedche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Berner.

Additional information

Accepted after two revisions by the editors of the special issue.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 241 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berner, M., Augustine, J. & Maedche, A. The Impact of Process Visibility on Process Performance. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58, 31–42 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0414-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0414-0

Keywords

  • BPM use case monitor
  • Process visibility
  • Continuous improvement
  • Situation awareness
  • ITSM event management