Data Governance

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    RACI is an acronym made up of the four authority codes Responsible, Accountable, Consulted and Informed.

  2. 2.

    A detailed description on this is given by Weber and Ofner (2008).

References

  1. AFNOR (2009) General principles for an environmental communication on mass market products. BP X30-323, AFNOR Groupe

  2. Atkinson K, McGaughey R (2006) Accounting for data: a shortcoming in accounting for intangible assets. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal 10(2):85–95

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bettschen P (2008) Master data challenges at Ciba. In: 8. CC CDQ workshop, Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen

  4. DAMA (2009) The DAMA guide to the data management body of knowledge. Technics publications, Bradley Beach, NJ

  5. Even A, Shankaranarayanan G (2007) Utility-driven assessment of data quality. ACM SIGMIS Database 38(2):75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodhue DL, Kirsch LJ, Quillard JA, Wybo MD (1992) Strategic data planning: lessons from the field. MIS Quarterly 16(1):267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Horne NW (1995) Information as an asset – the board agenda. In: Computer Audit Update 1995(9):5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. IBM (2007) The IBM data governance council maturity model: building a roadmap for effective data governance. IBM Corporation

  9. Initiate (2010) Data governance survey report http://www.initiate.com/Documents/Initiate-Data-Governance-Survey-Report.pdf. Accessed 2010-10-25

  10. ISO/IEC (2008) ISO/IEC 38500: corporate governance of information technology. ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical Commission)

  11. Khatri V, Brown CV (2010) Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM 53(1):148–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krüger W (1994) Organisation der Unternehmung. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loshin D (2008) Master data management. Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pierce E, Dismute WS, Yonke CL (2008) The state of information and data governance – understanding how organizations govern their information and data assets. IAIDQ and UALR-IQ

  15. Schulte-Zurhausen M (2005) Organisation, 4th edn. Vahlen, München

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang RY (1998) A product perspective on total data quality management. Communications of the ACM 41(2):58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber K, Ofner M (2008) Case study Ciba – organizing master data management. BE HSG/CC CDQ/11, Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen

  18. Weber K, Otto B, Österle H (2009) One size does not fit all – a contingency approach to data governance. ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality 1:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dr. Boris Otto.

Additional information

Accepted after two revisions by Prof. Dr. Sinz.

This article is also available in German in print and via http://www.wirtschaftsinformatik.de: Otto B (2011) Data Governance. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK. doi: 10.1007/s11576-011-0275-1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otto, B. Data Governance. Bus Inf Syst Eng 3, 241–244 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-011-0162-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Carbon Footprint
  • Data Owner
  • Business Requirement
  • Master Data
  • Function Diagram