Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the ability of fuzzy and robust DEA models to apply uncertainty conditions: an application for date palm producers

  • Application Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of uncertainty in data, especially in agriculture, is inevitable due to measurement errors and providing inaccurate information by farmers. This inaccurate and vague information can affect the result of the investigations and lead to incorrect decisions. In most efficiency estimation methods, including data envelopment analysis (DEA), the certainty and accuracy of the data is assumed. While in the real world, we are faced with uncertainty. Therefore, in this study, an attempt has been made to evaluate the ability of two Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis models in applying uncertainty. This goal was carried out in the form of evaluating the efficiency of 137 in Behbahan region, Iran, with RDEA and FDEA methods. According to the results, as the protection of RDEA and FDEA models against uncertainty increases, the average of all three types of technical, pure technical, and scale efficiency decreases so that in the most pessimistic conditions there was a decrease of about 22%. Based on the calculations, all the inputs have been used more than the average optimal values and the most important inputs that caused the inefficiency of the farms are machinery, arable land, pesticides, and fertilizers which on average with a 26% reduction of these inputs in the farms it is created inefficiently to reach the efficiency frontier. Monte Carlo simulation was used to verify the results of RDEA and FDEA models and to check the compliance of unit ratings with real world conditions. The results of this simulation showed that the average rating conformity percentage in the RDEA model is higher than in the FDEA model, so that in the most optimistic case, there is a 21% difference in conformity. In other words, the RDEA model is more flexible against uncertain data. In this context, it seems appropriate to use the findings of this model to improve the efficiency of inefficient farms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdpour, A., Asadabadi, E., Fami, H.S.: Analysis factors affecting date production efficiency in Bam County: with DEA approach. Iran. J. Agric. Econ. Dev. Res. 48, 507–518 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abdulai, S., Nkegbe, P.K., Donkoh, S.A.: Assessing the technical efficiency of maize production in northern Ghana: the data envelopment analysis approach. Cogent Food Agric. 4(1), 1512390 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1512390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad, Z., Jun, M.: Agricultural production structure adjustment scheme evaluation and selection based on DEA model for Punjab (Pakistan). J. Northeast Agric. Univ. (English Edition) 22(2), 87–91 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-8104(15)30037-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ángeles Herrador, M., González, A.G.: Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in analytical assays by means of Monte-Carlo simulation. Talanta 64(2), 415–422 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anonymous: Statistical Yearbook of Khuzestan Province [Unpublished results]1) (2018)

  6. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag. Sci. 30(9), 1078–1092 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartlett, J.E., Kotrlik, J.W., Higgins, C.C.: Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf. Technol. Learn. Perform. J. 19(1), 43–50 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bazrafshan, O., Zamani, H., Ramezani Etedali, H., Gerkaninezhad Moshizi, Z., Shamili, M., Ismaelpour, Y., Gholami, H.: Improving water management in date palms using economic value of water footprint and virtual water trade concepts in Iran. Agric. Water Manag. 229, 105941 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A.: Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math. Program. 88(3), 411–424 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bertsimas, D., Sim, M.: The price of robustness. Oper. Res. 52(1), 35–53 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., Stutz, J.: Foundations of data envelopment analysis for pareto-koopmans efficient empirical productions functions. J. Econom. 30, 91–107 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6), 429–444 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, Y.-S., Chen, B.-Y.: Applying DEA, MPI, and grey model to explore the operation performance of the Taiwanese wafer fabrication industry. Technol. Forecast. Social Change 78(3), 536–546 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coelli, T., Prasada Rao, D.S., Battese, G.E.: An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer Academic, Boston. http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:000394446

  15. Egilmez, G., Gumus, S., Kucukvar, M., Tatari, O.: A fuzzy data envelopment analysis framework for dealing with uncertainty impacts of input–output life cycle assessment models on eco-efficiency assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 129, 622–636 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Emrouznejad, A., Tavana, M.: Performance Measurement with Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Farrell, M.J.: The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. A (General) 120(3), 253–290 (1957). https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Govindan, K., Cheng, T.C.E.: Advances in stochastic programming and robust optimization for supply chain planning. Comput. Oper. Res. 100, 262–269 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.07.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hesampour, R., Bastani, A., Heidarbeigi, K.: Environmental assessment of date (Phoenix doctylifera) production in Iran by life cycle assessment. Inf. Process. Agric. 5(3), 388–393 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2018.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hladík, M.: Universal efficiency scores in data envelopment analysis based on a robust approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 122, 242–252 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Memariani, A., Lotfi, F.H., Rezai, H.Z.: A note on some of DEA models and finding efficiency and complete ranking using common set of weights. Appl. Math. Comput. 166(2), 265–281 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.04.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahmudah, U., Suhartono, S., Rohayana, A.D.: A robust data envelopment analysis for evaluating technical efficiency of Indonesian High Schools [DEA; efficiency; robust; outliers]. 7(1), 8 (2018) https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.9883

  23. Mardani, M., Salarpour, M.: Measuring technical efficiency of potato production in Iran using robust data envelopment analysis. Inf. Process. Agric. 2(1), 6–14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2015.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mardani Najafabadi, M., Abdeshahi, A.: Evaluating uncertainty of palm trees efficiency in Ahvaz County: application of robust data envelopment approach and monte Carlo simulation. J. Agric. Econ. Dev. 33(2), 191–204 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mardani Najafabadi, M., Mirzaei, A., Abdeshahi, A., Azarm, H.: Determining the efficiency of broiler chicken units in Sistan region, using interval data envelopment analysis and Mont Carlo simulation approach. Iran. J. Agric. Econ. Dev. Res. 51(2), 179–194 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mardani Najafabadi, M., Sabouni, M., Azadi, H., Taki, M.: Rice production energy efficiency evaluation in north of Iran; application of robust data envelopment analysis. Clean. Eng. Technol. 6, 100356 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mardani Najafabadi, M., Taki, M.: Robust data envelopment analysis with Monte Carlo simulation model for optimization the energy consumption in agriculture. Energy Sour. Part A Recov. Utiliz. Environ. Effects. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1777221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mengui, K.C., Oh, S., Lee, S.H.: The technical efficiency of smallholder Irish potato producers in Santa subdivision, Cameroon. Agriculture 9(12), 259 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mosbah, E., Zaibet, L., Dharmapala, P.S.: A new methodology to measure efficiencies of inputs (outputs) of decision making units in data envelopment analysis with application to agriculture. Socio Econ. Plan. Sci. 72, 100857 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mu, W., Kanellopoulos, A., van Middelaar, C.E., Stilmant, D., Bloemhof, J.M.: Assessing the impact of uncertainty on benchmarking the eco-efficiency of dairy farming using fuzzy data envelopment analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 189, 709–717 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mugera, A.W.: Measuring technical efficiency of dairy farms with imprecise data: a fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 57(4), 501–520 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nastis, S.A., Bournaris, T., Karpouzos, D.: Fuzzy data envelopment analysis of organic farms. Oper. Res. Int. J. 19(2), 571–584 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0294-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Omrani, H., Valipour, M., Emrouznejad, A.: A novel best worst method robust data envelopment analysis: Incorporating decision makers’ preferences in an uncertain environment. Oper. Res. Perspect. 8, 100184 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2021.100184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Papadopoulos, C.E., Yeung, H.: Uncertainty estimation and Monte Carlo simulation method. Flow Meas. Instrum. 12(4), 291–298 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(01)00015-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Peykani, P., Mohammadi, E., Saen, R.F., Sadjadi, S.J., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M.: Data envelopment analysis and robust optimization: a review. Expert. Syst. 37(4), e12534 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Podinovski, V.V.: Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55(12), 1311–1322 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sabouhi, M., Mardani, M.: Linear robust data envelopment analysis: CCR model with uncertain data. Int. J. Prod. Qual. Manag. 22(2), 262–280 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shahnavazi, A.: Determining the efficiency of Iran’s Provinces in onion production: application of data envelopment analysis. J. Agric. Econ. Res. 9(133), 145–164 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sherzod, B., Kim, K.-R., Lee, S.H.: Agricultural transition and technical efficiency: an empirical analysis of wheat-cultivating Farms in Samarkand Region, Uzbekistan. Sustainability 10(9), 3232 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shokouhi, A.H., Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M., Saati, S.: A robust optimization approach for imprecise data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 59(3), 387–397 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Taghizadeh, S.F., Rezaee, R., Azizi, M., Hayes, A.W., Giesy, J.P., Karimi, G.: Pesticides, metals, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in date fruits: a probabilistic assessment of risk to health of Iranian consumers. J. Food Compos. Anal. 98, 103815 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Toloo, M., Mensah, E.K.: Robust optimization with nonnegative decision variables: a DEA approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 127, 313–325 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, Y.-M., Greatbanks, R., Yang, J.-B.: Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 153(3), 347–370 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2004.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the Agricultural Sciences and the Natural Resources University of Khuzestan for their financial and spiritual support of this study.

Funding

This study is a part of research (Assessing the ability of Uncertain data envelopment analysis models to determine the efficiency of date producers: Application of Monte Carlo simulation method [Grant Numbers 991.08]) with the support of the Research and Technology Deputy of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, P.O. Box: 6341773637, Mollasani, Iran

    Mostafa Mardani Najafabadi & Abas Abdeshahi

  2. Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, P.O. Box: 4818166996, Sari, Iran

    Hanieh Kazmi & Somayeh Shirzadi Laskookalayeh

Authors
  1. Mostafa Mardani Najafabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanieh Kazmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Somayeh Shirzadi Laskookalayeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abas Abdeshahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa Mardani Najafabadi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mardani Najafabadi, M., Kazmi, H., Shirzadi Laskookalayeh, S. et al. Investigating the ability of fuzzy and robust DEA models to apply uncertainty conditions: an application for date palm producers. OPSEARCH 60, 776–801 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-023-00631-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-023-00631-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation