Skip to main content


Log in

Evaluating performance of engineering departments in an Indian University using DEMATEL and compromise ranking methods

  • Application Article
  • Published:
OPSEARCH Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Performance efficiency of educational institutions should be constantly scrutinized and improved to make sure that competent manpower and researchers are produced proficiently in meeting the institutional standard of intellectuals. With a systematic performance evaluation system, resources can be directed satisfactorily and tasks may be completed effectively. Performance evaluation and ranking of engineering departments of technical institutions have received very limited attention due to complexity and difficulty in measuring the outputs. However, in today’s global education system, performance evaluation of engineering departments is required to assess whether they meet the set objectives and foster an environment of continuous improvement. So, the objective of this paper is set to develop a multi-criteria decision-making framework for performance evaluation and ranking of 16 engineering departments in an Indian university which addresses the inter-relationships between the selection criteria with the aid of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method while building a relationship structure. Entropy method is used to determine the relative criteria weights, and finally, a compromise ranking method is applied to prioritize and rank those departments. It is observed that Electrical Engineering department emerges out as the best performer and Information Technology department lags behind in its performance. Based on analytical results, faculty/student ratio, infrastructural development, student results and international research publications are identified to play major roles in evaluating the performance of those departments. This integrated model can help practitioners to improve their decision-making process, especially when criteria are numerous and interrelated. Its relevance and implementation issues in context of Indian engineering education scenario are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Agasisti, T., Catalano, G., Landoni, P., Verganti, R.: Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency. Res. Eval. 21(1), 2–14 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agha, S.R., Kuhail, I., Abdelnabi, N., Salem, M., Ghanim, A.: Assessment of academic department’s efficiency using data envelopment analysis. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 4(2), 301–325 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Shayea, A.S., Battal, A.H.: Evaluating the efficiency of faculties in Qassim University using data envelopment analysis. J. Bus. Adm. Educ. 4/2, 132–138 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Turki, U., Duffaa, S.: Performance measures for academic departments. Int J Educ Manag 17/7, 330–338 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alwadood, Z., Mohd Noor N., Kamarudin, M.F.: Performance measure of academic departments using data envelopment analysis. Proc. IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications, Malaysia, 395–399 (2011)

  6. Aziz, N.A.A., Janor, R.M., Mahadi, R.: Comparative departmental efficiency analysis within a university: a DEA approach. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 90, 540–548 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Budget Report. Jadavpur University Press (2012)

  8. Carrington, R., Coelli, T., Rao, D.S.P.: The performance of Australian universities: conceptual issue and preliminary results. Econ. Pap. 24, 145–163 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y.-C., Lien, H.-P., Tzeng, G.-H.: Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model. Expert Syst. Appl. 37/2, 926–938 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Derlacz, J.W., Parteka, A.: Efficiency of European public higher education institutions: a two-stage multicountry approach. Scientometrics 89/3, 887–917 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fontela, E., Gabus, A.: The DEMATEL Observer. DEMATEL 1976 Report. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Switzerland (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gabus, A., Fontela, E.: Perceptions of the World Problematique: Communication Procedure, Communicating with Those Bearing Collective Responsibility. DEMATEL Report No. 1. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hamidi, N., Yousefi, P., Rahimi, A., Jabari, F.: A hybrid of Borda and DEMTEL for productivity improvement. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2, 2757–2764 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Retrieved on 10/01/2014

  15. Retrieved on 12/01/2014

  16. Retrieved on 14/01/2014

  17. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer Verlag, Berlin (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Kao, C., Hung, H.T.: Efficiency analysis of university departments: an empirical study. Omega 36/4, 653–664 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Köksal, G., Nalçaci, B.: The relative efficiency of departments at a Turkish engineering college: a data envelopment analysis. High. Educ. 51/2, 173–189 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lal, A., De, R.P., Sen, A.: The Lamp in the Lotus: A History of Jadavpur University. Jadavpur University Press, Calcutta (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lopes, A.L.M., Lanzer, E.A.: Data envelopment analysis-DEA and fuzzy sets to assess the performance of an academic departments: a case study at a Federal University of Santa Catarina UFSC. Pesqui. Operacional 22/2, 217–230 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Martín, E.: Efficiency and quality in the current higher education context in Europe: an application of the data envelopment analysis methodology to performance assessment of departments within the University of Zaragoza. Qual. High. Educ. 12/1, 57–79 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mukherjee, H., Mukherjee, U.: The Origins of the National Education Movement. National Council of Education, Calcutta (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Olson, K., Vu, L.: Economic efficiency in farm households: trends, explanatory factors, and estimation methods. Agric. Econ. 40, 587–599 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156, 445–455 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178, 514–529 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prathap, G., Gupta, B.M.: Ranking of Indian engineering and technological institutes for their research performance during 1999–2008. Curr. Sci. 97, 304–306 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rayenim, M.M., Saljooghi, F.H.: Benchmarking in the academic departments using data envelopment analysis. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 7/11, 1464–1469 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sengupta, S.: Skills gap hurts technology boom in India. The New York Times. 17 October (2006)

  30. Tamura, H., Akazawa, K.: Structural modeling and systems analysis of uneasy factors for realizing safe, secure and reliable society. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol. 3, 64–72 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tauer, L.W., Fried, H.O., Fry, W.E.: Measuring of academic departments within a college. Educ. Econ. 15, 473–489 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tyagi, P., Yadav, S.P., Singh, S.P.: Relative performance of academic departments using DEA with sensitivity analysis. Eval. Program Plan. 32/2, 168–177 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shankar Chakraborty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ranjan, R., Chatterjee, P. & Chakraborty, S. Evaluating performance of engineering departments in an Indian University using DEMATEL and compromise ranking methods. OPSEARCH 52, 307–328 (2015).

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: