Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preferred illumination level by the viewers for displaying paintings in exhibition space

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Optics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Light plays a crucial role for display of paintings in any exhibition. Lack of proper illumination makes the displays ineffective to the exhibition visitors. Earlier studies have argued that viewers’ preference for illumination level is usually higher than recommended level. However, these studies were based on general room illumination and viewers’ preferred illumination level for viewing paintings has not been considered. Therefore, in this study, an experiment has been designed (questionnaire on semantic differential scale, N = 30) to understand viewers’ preferred illumination level for viewing water and oil medium paintings. The findings from the experimental result are depicting that viewers prefer higher illumination level (100 lux for water-based paintings and 150 lux for oil-based paintings) than the recommended for both mediums of paintings. Also, the result is supporting that viewers’ preference for illumination level is not significantly effected by the medium of painting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Steel, New Oxford English–English–Malay Dictionary (Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd., Shah Alam, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Pettersson, Good Lighting for Museums,Galleries and Exhibitions (2014)

  3. C. Cuttle, Damage to museum objects due to light exposure. Light. Res. Technol. 28(1), 1–9 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Cuttle, Lighting works of art for exhibition and conservation. Light. Res. Technol. 20(2), 43–53 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Hoon, K. Hong-Bum, New evaluation method for the lightfastness of colored papers by radiant energy. Illum. Eng. Soc 29, 17–24 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Schaeffer, Effects of Light on Materials in Collections (Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. E. S. o. N America, The IESNA Lighting Handbook, 9th edn. (IES, New York, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Ikeda, C. Huang, S. Ashizawa, Equivalent lightness of colored objects at illuminances from the scotopic to the photopic level. Color Res. Appl. 14, 198–206 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. I Standard, IS 3646, Part I (Government of India, New Delhi, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Crawford, Just perceptible colour differences in relation to level of illumination. Stud. Conserv. 18, 159–166 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Boyce, Visual acuity, colour discrimination, and light level, in Lighting in Museums, Galleries and Historic Houses (UK Institute for Conservation and the Museums Association, London, 1987), pp. 50–57

  12. D. Loe, Preferred lighting for the display of paintings with conservation in mind, in Lighting in Museums, Galleries and Historic Houses (UK Institute for Conservation and the Museums Association, London, 1987), pp. 36–49

  13. R. Hunt, Light and dark adaptation and the perception of colour. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 42, 190–199 (1952)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M.H.A. Wahab, A.F.A. Zuhardi, Human visual quality: art gallery exhibition. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 101, 476–487 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T.S. Association, Displays (The Scout Association, Information Centre, London, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Cuttle, Light for Art’s Sake (Routledge, London, 2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Scuello, A. Israel, G. James, W. Steven, Museum lighting: optimizing the illuminant. Color Res. Appl 29, 121–127 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Kruithof, Philips Techn. Rev. (Philips, 1941)

  19. S.S. Ao-Thongthip, P.P. Suriyothin, V. Inkarojrit, The combined effect of gender and age on preferred illuminance and colour temperature in daily living activities. Lux Pac. 441–445 (2013)

  20. F. Vienot, M. Duranda, E. Mahler, Kruithof’s rule revisited using LED illumination. J. Modern Opt. 56(13), 1433–1446 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. P.R. Boyce, C. Cuttle, Effect of correlated colour temperature on the perception of interiors and colour discrimination. Light. Res. Technol. 22(1), 19–36 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Davis, D. Ginthner, Correlated color temperature, illuminance level and the Kruithof curve. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 19, 27–38 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Wei, K. Houser, B. Orland, D. Lang, N. Ra, M. Sliwinski, M. Bose, Field study of office worker responses to fluorescent lighting of different CCT and lumen output. Environ. Psychol. 39, 62–76 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Dikel, G. Burns, J.A. Veitch, S. Mancini, G.R. Newsham, Preferred chromaticity of color-tunable LED lighting. Leukos 10(2), 101–115 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Han, P. Boyce, Illuminance, CCT, décor and the Kruithof curve, in CIE (San Diego, 2003)

  26. C. Chou, H. Luo, H. Chen, M. Luo, Museum lighting environment: build up perception zone maps on led illumination, in Lighting Quality and Energy Efficiency (Kuala Lumpur, 2014)

  27. Q. Zhai, M. Luo, X. Liu, The impact of illuminance and colour temperature on viewing fine art paintings under LED lighting. Light. Res. Technol. 47(7), 795–809 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. N. Yoshizawa, T. Fujiwara, T. Miyashita, A study on the appearance of paintings in the museum under violet and blue LED, in CIE (2013), pp. 474–381

  29. D. Tiller, Qualite´ de l’e´clairage (2016). http://irc.nrccnrc.gc.ca/pubs/bsi/92-5-print_f.html. Accessed Dec 2016

  30. S. Fotios, Lamp colour properties and apparent brightness: a review. Light. Res. Technol. 33(3), 163–181 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. V. Françoise, D. Marie-Lucie, M. Elodie, The effect of LED lighting on performance, appearance and sensations, in CIE Light and Lighting Conference with Special Emphasis on LEDs and Solid State Lighting (2009)

  32. C. Cuttle, P.R. Boyce, Kruithof revisited: a study of people's responses to illuminance and color temperature of lighting, in Light 2000: Proceedings 34th IES National Convention (IES, Sydney, 1988), pp 73–85

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Veitch, Psychological processes influencing lighting. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 30(1), 124–140 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S.H.A. Begemann, M.P.J. Aarts, A. Tenner, Daylight, Artificial Light, and People (Illuminating Engineering Society of Australia and New Zealand, Melbourne, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  35. L. Halonen, J. Lehtovaara, Need of Individual Control to Improve Daylight Utilization and User’s Satisfaction in Integrated Lighting Systems (Commission Internationale de l’éclairage, New Delhi, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  36. R.P. Leslie, S.B. Hartleb, Human response and variability in the luminous environment, in CIBSE National Lighting Conference (London, 1990)

  37. P. Boyce, Age, illuminance, visual performance and preference. Light. Res. Technol. 5, 125–140 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. J. Saunders, The role of the level and diversity of horizontal illumination in an appraisal of a simple office task. Light. Res. Technol. 1, 37–46 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. S. Kaye, Variations in the Luminous and Sonic Environment: Proofreading and Visual Search Effects; Mood States and Frustration Tolerance Aftereffects (Lighting Research Institute, New York, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  40. P.C. Hughes, J.F. McNelis, Lighting, productivity, and the work environment. Light. Des. + Appl. 8(12), 32–39 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. Bhattacharjee, S. Pal, Attention of viewers while viewing paintings depends on different types of exhibition light: a quantitative approach with eye-tracking method, in AHFE (2018)

  42. A. Bhattacharjee, S. Pal, Attention of viewers while viewing paintings changes with the different CCTs of exhibition light: a quantitative approach with eye-tracking method, in International Conference on Research into Design (Bangalore, 2019)

  43. M. Scuello, I. Abramov, J. Gordon, S. Weintraub, Museum lighting: optimizing the illuminant. Color Res. Appl. 29, 121–127 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. R. Feller, Control of deteriorating effects of light upon museum objects. Museum 17, 57–98 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. S. Fotios, A revised Kruithof graph based on empirical data. LEUKOS 13, 1–17 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  46. R.B. Sova, Art appreciation as a learned competence: a museum-based qualitative study of adult art specialist and art non-specialist visitors. Center Educ. Policy Stud. J. 5(4), 141–157 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  47. J.E. Flynn, C. Hendrick, T. Spencer, O. Martyniuk, A guide to methodology procedures for measring subjective impressions in lighting. J. IES 8, 95–110 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  48. S. Michalski, The Lighting Decision (Canadian Conservation Institute, Ottawa, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  49. S. Michalski, Summary of Issue (Richmond, 2007)

  50. A. Bhattacharjee, S. Mazumdar, A study of the suitability of led light sources over conventional light sources in a museum environment. Light Eng. 24(1), 36–40 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  51. D. Vazquez-Molinì, A. Alvarez Fernandez-Balbuena, A. Garcia Botella, J.A. Herràez, M. Del Egido, R. Ontañon, Advanced LED lighting system applied to cultural heritage goods, in Colour and Light in Architecture (2010)

  52. A. Bhattacharjee, S. Pal, Review on sustainable lighting design in art galleries to balance between visibility and conservation of light sensitive art exhibits, in International Conference on Research into Design (Guwahati, 2017)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Design Discipline, Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Jabalpur, Jabalpur, India

    Amrita Bhattacharjee

  2. Industrial Design Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India

    Swati Pal

Authors
  1. Amrita Bhattacharjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Swati Pal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amrita Bhattacharjee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacharjee, A., Pal, S. Preferred illumination level by the viewers for displaying paintings in exhibition space. J Opt 50, 289–298 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-021-00690-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-021-00690-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation