Abstract
In this work, using Snyder, SCS, and the geographically distributed approaches, synthetic unit hydrographs are developed for the recurring flood-impacted ungauged sub-watershed in the Ambika river basin of Gujarat. Due to the scarcity of observed rainfall-runoff data, enforcement of effective flood control measures have not been implemented in this area. Hence the districts in the Ambika river basin regularly experience unexpected floods during the monsoon season, resulting in loss of life and property. The unit hydrograph of a watershed is essential for developing a flood hydrograph, which is useful for flood forecasting. The majority of Indian watersheds are not gauged, and there is not enough rainfallrunoff data to develop a unit hydrograph. However, there are several approaches available that may be used to develop synthetic unit hydrographs using different regionally based empirical equations, and some of them are mentioned above. Using geospatial tools is one of the GIS-based methods for obtaining synthetic unit hydrographs that solely take into account the digital elevation model (DEM) which eliminates the use of regional empirical constants. The geographically distributed synthetic unit hydrograph (GDSUH) approach is employed here on the idea of distributed time-area unit hydrograph and spatial distribution of overland and channel flow velocity. The cumulative travel time map has been divided into isochrones to develop a time-area curve and the resulting unit hydrograph. In this technique, a pure translation flow process is assumed. This approach is most appropriate for watersheds of smaller size. Hence, in this present study, a smaller, unmeasured sub-watershed with an area of 46 km2 is chosen, and the synthetic unit hydrographs are derived using each of the three approaches. The findings from this study were analyzed to determine the most appropriate method for this region. It was observed that the GDSUH is more suitable in comparison to the other two conventional synthetic unit hydrograph approaches. In smaller and un-gauged watersheds, this method gives a conceptual model for forecasting stream flow hydrographs that will capture the geographically distributed nature of the rainfall-runoff process. Additionally, it has the advantages of being simple, quick, inexpensive, and time-saving, especially for smaller regions that lack rainfall-runoff data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajward, M.H., Muzik, I. (2000) A spatially varied unit hydrograph model. Jour. Environ. Hydrol., v.8, pp.1–8.
Arora, K.R. (2004) Irrigation, water power and water resources engineering standard publishers, Delhi 1705-B, pp.79–106.
Bernard, M.M. (1935) An approach to determinate stream flow. Trans.Amer. Soc. Civil Eng., v.100(1), pp.347–362.
Bhunya, P.K., Panda, S.N., Goel, M.K. (2011) Synthetic unit hydrograph methods: a critical review. Open Hydrol. Jour., v.5(1), pp.1–8.
Brainard, J.S., Lovett, A.A., Bateman, I.J. (1997) Using isochrone surfaces in travel-cost models. Jour. Transport Geography, v.5(2), pp.117–126
Cronshey, R. (1986) Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division
Diakakis, M. (2011) A method for flood hazard mapping based on basin morphometry: application in two catchments in Greece. Natural Hazards, v.56(3), pp.803–814
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2022) Predict Floods with Unit Hydrographs. Estimate Stream Runoff during a Predicted Rainstorm in Vermont, a lesson was developed by ESRI’s Learn ArcGIS team, https://learn.arcgis.com/
Gatrell, A.C. (1983) Distance and space: a geographical perspective. Clarendon Press.
Gu, Y., Lin, J., Wang, X.L., Zhang, X.J. (2012) Trend of Annual Runoff for Major Rivers in China under Climate Change. Procedia Eng., v.28, pp.564–568
Hawkins, R.H., Hjelmfelt, Jr. A.T., Zevenbergen, A.W. (1985) Runoff probability, storm depth, and curve numbers. Jour. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE, v.111, pp.330–340
Hoffmeister, G., Weisman, R.N. (1977) Accuracy of Synthetic Hydrographs Derived from Representative Basins/La précision des hydrogrammes synthétiques dérivés des bassins représentatifs. Hydrol. Sci. Jour., v.22(2), pp.297–312
Katara, P., Machiwal, D., Mittal, H.K., Dashora, Y., Bhagwat, A.D. (2013) Estimation of Runoff for Ahar River Catchment in Udaipur District Integrated Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System. The Institute of Engineers (India), Udaipur local Centre, pp.169–175
Kilgore, J.L. (1997) Development and evaluation of a GIS-based spatially distributed unit hydrograph model (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech)
Maidment, D.R., Olivera, F., Calver, A., Eatherall, A., Fraczek, W. (1996) Unit hydrograph derived from a spatially distributed velocity field. Hydrol. Process., v.10(6), pp.831–844
Mansoor, C.N. (2014) Flood hazard zonation mapping using geoinformatics technology; Bennihalla Basin, Gadag and Dharwad District, Karnataka, India. Int. Jour. Eng. Res. Tech., ESRSA Publ., v.3(9), pp.750–755.
Mockus, V. (1957) Use of storm and watershed characteristics in synthetic hydrograph analysis and application. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
Monajemi, P., Khaleghi, S., Maleki, S. (2021) Derivation of instantaneous unit hydrographs using linear reservoir models. Hydrol. Res., v.52(2), pp.339–355
Muzik, I. (1996) Flood modelling with GIS derived distributed unit hydrographs. Hydrol. Process., v.10(10), pp.1401–1409
Narayan, K., Dikshit, P.K.S., Dwivedi, S.B. (2013) Spatially distributed unit hydrograph for Varuna River basin of India. Int. Jour. Civ. Struct. Environ. Infrastruct. Eng. Res. Dev., v.3, pp.27–34
Noto, L.V., La Loggia, G. (2007) Derivation of a distributed unit hydrograph integrating GIS and remote sensing. Jour. Hydrol. Eng., v.12(6), pp.639–650
O’Sullivan, D., Morrison, A., Shearer, J. (2000) Using desktop GIS for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach. Int. Jour. Geograph. Inform. Sci., v.14(1), pp.85–104
Ponce, V.M. (1989) Engineering hydrology: Principles and practice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp.175–182
Roy, A., Thomas, R. (2017) Development of spatially distributed unit hydrograph for Bharathapuzha River basin. Int. Jour. Innovative Res. Sci. Eng. Tech., v.6, pp.1–6
Sadeghi, S.H.R., Mostafazadeh, R., Sadoddin, A. (2015) Changeability of simulated hydrograph from a steep watershed resulted from applying Clark’s IUH and different time-area histograms. Environ. Earth Sci., v.74(4), pp.3629–3643
Sarangi, A., Madramootoo, C.A., Enright, P, Prasher, S.O. (2007) Evaluation of three unit hydrograph models to predict the surface runoff from a Canadian watershed. Water Resour. Managmt., v.21(7), pp.1127–1143
SCS (Soil Conservation Service) (1972) National Engineering Handbook: Hydrology Section 4: Hydrology, Supplement A. Washington DC: US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division
Shaikh, M.M.P.. Yadav, S.M., Manekar, V.L. (2021) Assessment of the empirical methods for the development of the synthetic unit hydrograph: a case study of a semi-arid river basin. Water Practice & Technology, Epub ahead of print 1 December 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2021.117
Shatnawi, A., Ibrahim, M. (2022) Derivation of flood hydrographs using SCS synthetic unit hydrograph technique for Housha catchment area. Water Supply, v.22(5), pp.4888–4901. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.169
Sherman, L.K. (1932) Streamflow from rainfall by the unit-graph method. Eng. News Record, v. 108, pp.501–505
Singh, P., Mishra, S., Jain, M. (2014) A review of the synthetic unit hydrograph: from the empirical UH to advanced geomorphological methods. Hydrol. Sci. Jour., v.59(2), pp.239–261
Singh, V. (1988) Hydrologic Systems, Rainfall-Runoff Modeling, Vol. 1. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Singh, V.P., Frevert, D.K. (2003) Watershed modeling. World Water & Environmental Resources Congress 2003, 23–26 June 2003, Philadelphia, PA. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/40685(2003)167
Snyder, F.F. (1938) Synthetic unit graphs. Eos, Trans., Amer. Geophys. Union, v.19(1), pp.447–454
Taylor, A.B., Schwarz, H.E. (1952) Unit hydrograph lag and peak flow related to basin characteristics. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, v.33(2), pp.235–246
U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1940) Engineering construction-flood control. Fort Belvoir, VA: Engineering School, USACE
Wayal, A.S., Parmeswaran, P.V., Ameta, N.K. (2008) Derivation of Unit Hydrographs for Ungauged Catchments. In: 2008 First International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology (pp. 1029–1034). IEEE
Xiaofang, R., Mei, Y., Fanggui, L., Xinglong, G. (2008) Calculation of watershed flow concentration based on the grid drop concept. Water Sci. Eng., v.1(1), pp.1–9.
Yen, B.C. and Lee, K.T. (1997) Unit hydrograph derivation for ungauged watershed by stream order laws. Jour. Hydrol. Eng., v.2(1), pp.1–9.
Younggu, H., Kwangsoo, Y., Jung-Hun, S. (2021).Parallelization of a two-dimensional time-area watershed routing, Environ. Model. & Software, v.146.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harini, S., Barik, D.K., Pratyusha, N. et al. A Case Study on GIS Based Method to Develop Geographically Distributed Synthetic Unit Hydrograph using Geo-Spatial Tools in Ungauged Sub-watershed of Ambika River Basin, Gujarat. J Geol Soc India 99, 1165–1172 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-023-2442-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-023-2442-6