Abstract
We consider existing reliable data indicate the depositional age of the uppermost sandstone (Maihar Sandstone) of the Vindhyan Supergroup to be closer to 1000 Ma. We consider the penultimate statement by Pandey et al. (2023) “… the Maihar Sandstone is deposited within the Ediacaran Period” (our italics) is erroneous. In this note, we address both the dubious geochronology and the dubious biostratigraphy called on by Pandey et al. (op. cit.), and comment on the impropriety of changing extant stratigraphy on the basis of either.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee, A. and Banerjee, D.M. (2010) Modal analysis and geochemistry of two sandstones of the Bhander Group (Late Neoproterozoic) in parts of the Central Indian Vindhyan basin and their bearing on the provenance and tectonics. Jour. Earth Syst. Sci., v.119, pp.825–839.
Basumallick, S. (1962) Certain sedimentological features of the Bhander Sandstone in Maihar, M.P. Quart. Jour. Geol. Min. Soc. India, v.34, pp.175–181.
Bickford, M.E., and Basu, A. (2021) Towards resolving the ‘jigsaw puzzle’ and age-fossil inconsistency within east Gondwana: A comment. Precambrian Res., v. 352, p. 105881.
Chakrabarti, A. (1990) Traces and dubiotraces: examples from the so-called Late Proterozoic siliciclastic rocks of the Vindhyan Supergroup around Maihar, India: Precambrian Res., v.47, pp.141–153.
Chakrabarty, S. (2002) Sedimentation sequence of the three youngest members of the Vindhyan Supergroup, central India. Unpublished Thesis, Chapter 4, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India, pp.47–63.
Choudhuri, A., Banerjee, S., and Sarkar, S. (2020) A review of biotic signatures within the Precambrian Vindhyan Supergroup: Implications on evolution of microbial and metazoan life on Earth. Jour. Mineral. Petrol. Sci., v.115, pp.162–174.
George, B.G., Ray, J.S., Pillai, S.P., Mahala, M.K., Kumar, S. and Kale, V.S. (2023) C−Sr−Pb isotope systematics of the carbonate sequences of Kaladgi Supergroup, India: Implications for basin evolution and correlation with Proterozoic global events. Precambrian Res., v. 388, 107014.
George, B. G., Ray, J. S., Shukla, A. D., Chatterjee, A., Awasthi, N., and Laskar, A. H. (2018) Stratigraphy and geochemistry of the Balwan Limestone, Vindhyan Supergroup, India: Evidence for the Bitter Springs ä13C anomaly. Precambrian Res., v. 313, pp.18–30.
Gilleaudeau, G.J., Sahoo, S.K., Kah, L.C., Henderson, M.A. and Kaufman, A.J. (2018) Proterozoic carbonates of the Vindhyan Basin, India: Chemostratigraphy and diagenesis. Gondwana Res., v.57, pp.10–25.
Gopalan, K., Kumar, A., Kumar, S. and Vijayagopal, B. (2013) Depositional history of the Upper Vindhyan succession, central India: Time constraints from Pb−Pb isochron ages of its carbonate components. Precambrian Res., v.233, pp.108–117.
Hofmann, H.J. (2005) Palaeoproterozoic dubiofossils from India revisited - Vindhyan triploblastic animal burrows or pseudofossils? Jour. Palaeontol. Soc. India, v.50, pp.113–120.
Hughes, N.C. (2017) Biostratigraphical dating conundrums in the Cambrian and earlier stratigraphy of the Indian subcontinent. Palaeobotanist, v.66, pp.1–15.
Kingsmill, J.W. (1871) The probable origin of deposits of “Loess” in North China and eastern Asia. Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc., v.27, pp.376–384.
Knoll, A.H. (1992) Vendian microfossils in metasedimentary cherts of the Scotia Group, Prins Karls Forland, Svalbard. Palaeontology, v.35, pp.751–774.
Kumar S. (2012) Stratigraphy and correlation of the Neoproterozoic deposits of central and western India: An overview. Geol. Soc. Spec. Pub., v.366(1), pp.75–90.
Kumar S. (2016) Megafossils from the Vindhyan Basin, central India: An overview. Jour. Palaeontol. Soc. India, v.61(2), pp.273–286.
Kumar, S. (2009) Controversy concerning ‘Cambrian’ fossils from the Vindhyan sediments: A reassessment. Jour. Palaeontol. Soc. India, v.54(1), pp.115–117.
Kumar, B., Das Sharma, S., Sreenivas, B., Dayal, A.M., Rao, M.N., Dubey, N. and Chawla, B.R. (2002) Carbon, oxygen and strontium isotope geochemistry of Proterozoic carbonate rocks of the Vindhyan Basin, central India. Precambrian Res., v.113(1–2), pp.43–63.
Kumar, S. and Pandey, S.K. (2008) Arumberia and associated fossils from the Neoproterozoic Maihar Sandstone, Vindhyan Supergroup, Central India. Jour. Palaeontol. Soc. India, v.53, pp.83–97.
Kumar, S. and Pandey, S.K. (2009) Note on the occurrence of Arumberia banksi and associated fossils from the Jodhpur Sandstone, Marwar Supergroup, western Rajasthan. Jour. Palaeontol. Soc. India, v.54, pp.171–178.
Kumar, S., Schidlowski, M. and Joachimski, M.M. (2005) Carbon isotope stratigraphy of the Palaeo-Neoproterozoic Vindhyan Supergroup, central India; implications for basin evolution and intrabasinal correlation. Jour. Palaeontol. Soc. India, v.50(1), pp.65–81.
Kumar, S. and Sharma, M. (2012) Vindhyan Basin, Son Valley area, Central India, Field Guide-4. The Palaeontol. Soc. India, p.145.
Kumari, V., Tandon, S.K., Tomson, J.K. and Ghatak, A. (2023) Detrital zircon U−Pb ages of Proterozoic and Cretaceous sandstones of Narmada region in Central India: Implications for provenance and the closure age of the Vindhyan Basin. EarthArXiv.org https://doi.org/10.31223/X5D94R
Lan, Z., Zhang, S., Li, X.H., Pandey, S.K., Sharma, M., Shukla, Y., Ahmad, S., Sarkar, S. and Zhai, M. (2020) Towards resolving the ‘jigsaw puzzle’ and age-fossil inconsistency within East Gondwana. Precambrian Res., v.345, 105775.
Lan, Z., Zhang, S., Li, X.H., Pandey, S.K., Sharma, M., Shukla, Y., Ahmad, S., Sarkar, S. and Zhai, M. (2021) Reply to “Towards resolving the ‘jigsaw puzzle’ and age-fossil inconsistency within east Gondwana: A comment by Bickford & Basu (2021). Precambrian Res., v.352, 105881.
Malone, S.J., Meert, J.G., Banerjee, D.M., Pandit, M.K., Tamrat, J., Kamenov, G.D., Pradhan, V.R. and Sohl, L.I. (2008) Paleomagnetism and detrital zircon geochemistry of the Upper Vindhyan sequence of Son Valley and Rajasthan: a ca.1000 Ma closure age for the Purana Basin. Precambrian Res., v.164, pp.137–159.
McKenzie, N.R., Hughes, N.C., Myrow, P.M., Xiao, S. and Sharma, M. (2011) Correlation of Precambrian-Cambrian sedimentary successions across northern India and the utility of isotopic signatures of Himalayan lithotectonic zones. Earth Planet Sc. Lett., v.312, pp.471–483.
McMahon, W.J., Davies, N.S., Liu, A.G. and Went, D.J. (2022) Enigma variations: characteristics and likely origin of the problematic surface texture Arumberia, as recognized from an exceptional bedding plane exposure and the global record. Geol. Mag., v.159, pp.1–20.
Meert, J.G. and Pandit, M.K. (2015) The Archaean and Proterozoic history of Peninsular India: tectonic framework for Precambrian sedimentary basins in India. Geol. Soc. London, Mem., v.43, pp.29–54.
Meert, J. G., Pandit, M. K., Kwafo, S., and Singha, A. (2023) Stinging News: ‘Dickinsonia’ discovered in the Upper Vindhyan of India Not Worth the Buzz. Gondwana Res., v.117, pp.1–7.
Meert, J. G., Pivarunas, A. F., Miller, S. R., Pandit, M. K., and Sinha, A. K. (2021) The Precambrian drift history and paleogeography of India. In: Ancient Supercontinents and the Paleogeography of Earth,p p.305–332. Elsevier.
Pandey, S.K, Ahmad, S. and Sharma, M. (2023) Dickinsonia tenuis reported by Retallack et al. 2021 is not a fossil, instead an impression of an extant ‘fallen beehive’. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.99, pp. 311–316.
Pandey, S.K., Singh, D., Sharma, M., Ahmad, S. and Bhan, U. (2023) A new palaeobiological assemblage from the Son Valley Bhander Group and its implications on the age of the upper Vindhyans of India. Palaeoworld, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2023.06.001.
Pradhan, V.R., Meert, J.G., Pandit, M.K., Kamenov, G., and Mondal, M. E. A. (2012) Paleomagnetic and geochronological studies of the mafic dyke swarms of Bundelkhand craton, central India: Implications for the tectonic evolution and paleogeographic reconstructions. Precambrian Res., v.198–199, pp.51–76.
Prasad, B. (2007) Obruchevella and other Terminal Proterozoic (Vendian) organic-walled microfossils from the Bhander Group (Vindhyan Supergroup), Madhya Pradesh. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.69(2), pp.295–310.
Prasad, B., Uniyal, S.N. and Asher, R. (2005) Organic-walled microfossils from the Proterozoic Vindhyan Supergroup of Son Valley, Madhya Pradesh, India. Palaeobotanist, v.54(1–3), pp.13–60.
Prasad, B., Uniyal, S.N. and Asher, R. (2007) Meso-Neoproterozoic organic-walled microfossils. In: Sinha, D.K. (Ed.), Micropalaeontology: Application in Stratigraphy and Paleoceanography, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, pp. 1–27.
Rathore, S.S., Vijan, A.R., Krishna, B.N., Prabhu, B.N. and Misra, K.N. (1999) Dating of glauconites from Sirbu Shale of Vindhyan Supergroup, India. Proceed. 3rd Internat. Petrol. Conf. Expl. Petrotech, v. 99, pp.191–196.
Ray, J.S., Martin, M.W., Veizer, J. and Bowring, S.A. (2002) U−Pb zircon dating and Sr isotope systematics of the Vindhyan Supergroup, India. Geology, v.30, pp.131–134.
Ray, J.S., Veizer, J. and Davis, W.J. (2003) C, O, Sr and Pb isotope systematics of carbonate sequences of the Vindhyan Supergroup, India; age, diagenesis, correlations and implications for global events. Precambrian Res., v.121(1–2), pp.103–140.
Retallack, G.J., Matthews, N.A., Master, S., Khangar, R.G. and Khan, M. (2021) Dickinsonia discovered in India and late Ediacaran biogeography. Gondwana Res., v.90, pp.165–170.
Retallack, G. J., Master, S., Khangar, R. G., and Khan, M. (2023) Discussion on “Stinging News: ‘Dickinsonia’discovered in the Upper Vindhyan of India not worth the buzz” by Meert, et al. (2023): Gondwana Res., v.118, pp.163–164.
Sarkar, S. and Banerjee, S. (2020) A Synthesis of Depositional Sequence of the Proterozoic Vindhyan Supergroup in Son Valley: A Field Guide. Springer Geology, p.188.
Sergeev, V.N., Sharma, M. and Shukla, Y. (2012) Proterozoic fossil cyanobacteria. Palaeobotanist, v.61, pp.189–358.
Sharma, M. (2008) Neoproterozoic Biotic Signatures in the Peninsular Indian Basins - An Overview. Mem. Geol. Soc. India, v.74, pp. 119–131.
Sharma, M., Pandey, S.K. and Kumar, S. (2020) Vindhyan Basin, Son Valley area, Central India; A Field trip guide. 36th International Geological Congress (IGC), p.176.
Sharma, M., Shukla, M. and Venkatachala, B.S. (1992) Metaphyte and Metazoan fossils from Precambrian sediments of India a critique. Palaeobotanist, v.40, pp.8–51.
Singh, I.B. (1981). A critical review of the fossil records in the Krol belt succession and its implications on the biostratigraphy and palaeogeography of the Lesser Himalaya. J. Palaeontol. Soc. India, v. 25, pp.148–169.
Tiwari, M. and Knoll, A.H. (1994) Large acanthomorphic acritarchs from the Infrakrol Formation of the Lesser Himalayas and their stratigraphic significance. Himalayan Geol., v.5, pp. 193–201.
Turner, C.C., Meert, J.G., Pandit, M.K. and Kamenov, G.D. (2014) A detrital zircon U−Pb and Hf isotopic transect across the Son Valley sector of the Vindhyan Basin, India: implications for basin evolution and paleogeography. Gondwana Res., v.26, pp.348–364.
Venkatachala, B.S., Sharma, M. and Shukla, M. (1996) Age and life of the Vindhyans—Facts and Conjectures. Mem. Geol. Soc. India, v.36, pp.137–165.
Zhang, Y., Yin, L., Xiao, S. and Knoll, A.H. (1998) Permineralised fossils from the Terminal Proterozoic Doushantuo Formation, South China. Paleontol. Soc. Mem., v.50, p.52.
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to Profs. S. K. Tandon, J. S. Ray, Ashok Sahni, D. M. Banerjee, and Zhongwu Lan who informally reviewed our draft response and offered constructive suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
12594_2023_2427_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Dickinsonia tenuis reported by Retallack et al. 2021 is not a Fossil, Instead an Impression of an Extant ‘fallen beehive’ by S.K. Pandey, Shamim Ahmad and Mukund Sharma. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.99, 2023, pp.1033–1036
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bickford, M.E., Basu, A. Dickinsonia tenuis reported by Retallack et al. 2021 is not a Fossil, Instead an Impression of an Extant ‘fallen beehive’ by S.K. Pandey, Shamim Ahmad and Mukund Sharma. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.99, 2023, pp.311–316. J Geol Soc India 99, 1033–1036 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-023-2427-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-023-2427-5