Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Error in digital network and basin area delineation using d8 method: A case study in a sub-basin of the Ganga

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

Digital elevation model (DEM) is one of the input data derived from different satellite sensors for hydrologic and hydraulic modelings. Two prime questions could be answered before using these DEMs. First, the acceptability of datasets for our use and second appropriate resolution of the dataset. Three widely used DEMs SRTM 30m, ASTER 30m and SRTM 90m are analyzed to evaluate their suitability to delineate river network and basin boundary area. The hydrology tool of spatial analyst extension inbuilt in ArcGIS 10.2 (which uses the D8 method for calculation of flow direction) has been used for the delineation of both river networks and basin boundary. The assessment of river network alignment and boundary delineation is carried out in the seven sub-catchments of Gandak river basin having different morphological characteristics. The automatically delineated boundary area for all the three DEMs reflects a significant difference when compared with the digitized basin area from the Ganga flood control commission (GFCC) map. The maximum boundary area delineation error is 39137.20 km2 forASTER 30m, and minimum delineation error of 13239.28 km2 for SRTM 90m. In the stream network, delineation accuracy is good for SRTM 90m while, except Gandak trunk, ASTER 30m DEM shows better delineation accuracy indicated by mean absolute error (MAE) and standard deviation (SD).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bravo, J.M., Allasia, D., Paz, A.R., Collischonn, W., Tucci, C.E.M. (2012) Coupled Hydrologic-Hydraulic Modeling of the Upper Paraguay River Basin. Jour. Hydrol. Engg., v.17(5), pp.635–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. (1986) Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Cabral, M.C. and Burges, S.J. (1994) Digital Elevation Model Networks (DEMON):A model of flow over hillslopes for computation of contributing and dispersal areas. Water Resour. Res., v.30(6), pp.1805–1815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel, M.C., Venancio, A. and Kahya, E. (2009) Flow forecast by SWAT model and ANN in Pracana basin, Portugal. Adv. Eng. Softw., v40(7), pp.467–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield, J. and Leymarie, P. (1991) Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resour. Res., v.27(5), pp.709–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, D. and Hammond, M. (2006) Issues of using digital maps for catchment delineation. Proc. ICE - Water Manag., v.159(WMI), pp.45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain Sharad, K. (2008) Impact of retreat of Gangotri glacier on the flow of Ganga River. Curr. Sci., v.95(8), pp.1012–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, S.K. and Domingue, J.O. (1988) Extracting Topographic Structure from Digital Elevation Data for Geographic Information System Analysis. Photogrammatric Engg. Remote Sens., v.54(11), pp.1593–1600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidment, D.R. (2002) Arc Hydro: GIS for water resources. ESRI press, Redlands, CA, pp.203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, I.D. and Grayson, R.B. (1991) Terrain-based catchment partitioning and runoff prediction using vector elevation data. Water Resour. Res., v.27(6), pp.1177–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan, J.F. and Mark, D.M. (1984) The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Comput. Vision, Graph. Image Process, v.28, pp.323–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlandini, S. (2003) Path-based methods for the determination of nondispersive drainage directions in grid-based digital elevation models. Water Resour. Res., v.39(6), pp.1144–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paiva, R.C.D., Collischonn, W. and Tucci, C.E.M. (2011) Large scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling using limited data and a GIS based approach. Jour. Hydrol., v.406 (3&4), pp.170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paz, A.R., Brabo, J.M., Allasia, D., W.C. and C.E.M.T. (2010) Large-Scale Hydrodynamic Modeling of a Complex River Network and Floodplains. Jour. Hydrol. Engg., v.15(2), pp.152-165.

  • Paz, A.R., Da Collischonn, W., Risso, A. and Mendes, C.A.B. (2008) Errors in river lengths derived from raster digital elevation models. Comput. Geosci., v.34(11), 1584–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira-Cardenal, S.J., Riegels, N.D., Berry, P.A.M., Smith, R.G., Yakovlev, A., Siegfried, T.U. and Bauer-Gottwein, P. (2011) Real-time remote sensing driven river basin modeling using radar altimetry. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., v.15(1), pp.241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pramanik, N., Panda, R.K. and Sen, D. (2009) One Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling of River Flow Using DEM Extracted River Cross-sections. Water Resour. Manag., v.24(4), pp.835–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, P., Beven, K., Chevallier, P., Planchon, O. (1991) The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrol. Process, v.5(1), pp.59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M.M., Arya, D.S. and Goel, N.K. (2010) Limitation of 90 m SRTM DEM in drainage network delineation using D8 method—A case study in flat terrain of Bangladesh. Appl. Geomatics, v.2(2), pp.49–58.

  • Seibert, J. and McGlynn, B.L. (2007) A new triangular multiple flow direction algorithm for computing upslope areas from gridded digital elevation models. Water Resour. Res., v.43(4), W04501, doi:10.1029/2006WR 005128

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A.N. (1952) Hypsometric (Area-Altitude) analysis of erosional topograply. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v.63(11), pp.1117–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SWAT (2012) Soil & Water Assessment Tool. Texas A&M University. Retrieved 1 March 2012.

  • Tarboton, D.G. (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour. Res., v.33(2), pp.309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalam, P., Krishna Mohan, B., Amit Kotwal, Vikash Mishra, V.M. and M.P. (2001) Automatic Delineation of Watersheds for hydrological applications. 22nd Asian Conferance Remote Sensing, Singapore.

  • Vladimir, J. Alarcon and Chuck O’Hara (2006) Using IFSAR and SRTM elevation data for watershed delineation. MAPPS/ASPRS 2006 Fall Conf. November 6-10, San Antonio, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, India

    Brijesh Kumar & Kanhu Charan Patra

  2. Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA

    Venkat Lakshmi

Authors
  1. Brijesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kanhu Charan Patra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Venkat Lakshmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brijesh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, B., Patra, K.C. & Lakshmi, V. Error in digital network and basin area delineation using d8 method: A case study in a sub-basin of the Ganga. J Geol Soc India 89, 65–70 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-017-0559-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-017-0559-1

Search

Navigation