Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the feasibility of CO2-enhanced oil recovery and storage in mature oil field: A case study from Cambay basin

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of the Geological Society of India

Abstract

The utilization of anthropogenic CO2 for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) can significantly extend the production life of an oil field, and help in the reduction of atmospheric emission of anthropogenic CO2 if sequestration is considered. This work summarizes the prospect of EOR and sequestration using CO2 flooding from an Indian mature oil field at Cambay basin through numerical modelling, simulation and pressure study based on limited data provided by the operator. To get an insight into CO2-EOR and safe storage process in this oil field, a conceptual sector model is developed and screening standard is proposed keeping in mind the major pay zone of the producing reservoir. To construct the geomodel, depth maps, well positions and coordinates, well data and well logs, perforation depths and distribution of petrophysical properties as well as fluid properties provided by the operator, has been considered. Based on the results from the present study, we identified that the reservoir has the potential for safe and economic geological sequestration of 15.04×106 metric ton CO2 in conjunction with a substantial increase in oil recovery of 10.4% of original oil in place. CO2-EOR and storage in this mature field has a bright application prospect since the findings of the present work could be a better input to manage the reservoir productivity, and the pressure field for significant enhancement of oil recovery followed by safe storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akervoll, I. and Bergmo, P.E. (2010) CO2-EOR from representative North Sea oil reservoirs. In: Paper SPE 139765-PP Presented at SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage and Utilization, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 10-12 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachu, S. (2000) Sequestration of CO2 in geological media: criteria and approaches for site selection in response to climate change. Energy Convers. Manage, v.41, pp.953–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachu, S. Et. Al. (2007) CO2 storage capacity estimation: methodology and gaps. Int. Jour. Greenhouse Gas Control, v.1(4), pp.430–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickle, M. (2009) Geological carbon storage. Nature Geoscience, v.2, pp.815–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimri, V.P., Srivastava, R.P. and Vedanti, N. (2012) Fractal Models in Exploration Geophysics: Applications to Hydrocarbon Reservoirs. 1st ed. Elsevier Science, v.41, ISBN: 978-0-08-045158-9.

  • Dimri, V. P. (2014) Use and Abuse of Excess CO2-An Overview. Jour. Indian Geophys. Union, v.18(2), pp.205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, B.A. (1972) Graphical method predicts geopressures worldwide. World Oil, v.182, pp.51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelder, T. and Fischer, M.P. (1994) Influence of poroelastic behavior on the magnitude of minimum horizontal stress, Sh, in overpressured parts of sedimentary basins. Geology, v.22, pp.949–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli, S. S., Vedanti, N., Akervoll, I. and Bergmo, P.E. (2014) An Estimation of CO2-EOR potential from a sector model in a Mature Oil Field, Cambay Basin, India. Proc. 50th Annual Convention by Indian Geophysical Union, Hyderabad, p293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D.G. (2004) No exit: Thinking about leakage from geologic carbon storage sites. Energy, v.29(9-10), pp.1571–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessen, K., Kovscek, A.R. and Orr, F.M.. (2005) Increasing CO2 Storage in Oil Recovery. Energy Conversion and Management, v.46, pp.293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovscek, A.R. (2002) Screening criteria for CO2 storage in oil reservoirs. Petrol. Sci. Tech., v.20(7-8), pp.841–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Rana, S., Nair, S., Chowdhury, S., Chakraborty, D. and Nath, G. (2008) Relevance of Formation Strength Estimations from Wireline Logs in Oil Exploitation from Fields of Mehsana Asset, North Cambay Basin, India, 7th Int. Conf. and Exp. on Petroleum Geophy. p.411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucier, A. and Zoback, M. (2008) Assessing the economic feasibility of regional deep saline aquifer CO2 injection and storage:A geomechanics-based workflow applied to the Rose Run sandstone in Eastern Ohio, USA. Int. Jour. Greenhouse Gas Control, v.2(2), pp.230–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamgai, D.C., Rangaraj, S., Singh, L. and Singh, D. (1997) Estimation and improving recovery under water flood: A case history from Ankleshwar field. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, SPE 38066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, G. and Harkness, R.M. (1987) Hydrocarbon migration by hydraulic fracturing. In: M.E. Jones and R.M.F. Preston (Ed.). Deformation of Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., v.29, pp.39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.K. and Kelly, J. (1967) How to predict formation pressure and fracture gradient. Oil & Gas Journal, v.65, no.8, pp.92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggeridge, A., Cockin, A., Webb, K., Frampton, H., Collins, I., Moulds, T. and Salino, P. (2014) Recovery rates, enhanced oil recovery and technological limits. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. A 372:20120320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, M.K. (1981) Evolution of Ankleshwar Anticline, Cambay Basin, India. Geologic Notes, AAPG, pp.336–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, F.M. and Taber, J.J. (1984) Use of Carbon Dioxide in Enhanced Oil Recovery. Science, v.224, no.4649, pp.563–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumb, R.A., Evans, K.F. and Engelder, T. (1991) Geophysical log responses and their correlation with bed-to-bed stress contrasts in Paleozoic rocks, Appalachian plateau, New York. Jour. Geophys. Res., v.96, No. B9, pp.14, 509-14,528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochelle, C.A., Czernichowski-Lauriol, I. and Milodowski, A. E. (2004) The impact of chemical reactions on CO2 storage in geological formations: A brief review. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ., 233(1), pp.87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilthuis, R.J. (1936) Active oil and reservoir energy. Trans. AIME, v.118, pp.33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlumberger. (2011) Technical Description of Eclipse Eclipse Reservoir Simulation Software v.2011.1, pp.819–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrag, D.P. (2007) Preparing to Capture Carbon. Science, v.315, no.5813, pp.812–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R.P., Vedanti, N., Dimri, V. P., Akervoll, I. Bergmo, P.E. and Biram, R.S. (2012) CO2-EOR:A Feasibility Study of an Indian Oil Field. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, SEG-2012-1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D. and Seright, R.S. (1997) EOR screening criteria revisited-part 1: introduction to screening criteria and enhanced recovery field projects. SPE Reservoir Eng., v.12(3), pp.189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D.F., Liao, X.W. and Yin, D.D. (2014) Evaluation of CO2 enhanced oil recovery and sequestration potential in low permeability reservoirs, Yanchang Oilfield, China. Jour. Energy Inst., v.87, pp.306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shib Sankar Ganguli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganguli, S.S., Vedanti, N., Akervoll, I. et al. Assessing the feasibility of CO2-enhanced oil recovery and storage in mature oil field: A case study from Cambay basin. J Geol Soc India 88, 273–280 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-016-0490-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-016-0490-x

Keywords

Navigation