Journal of the Geological Society of India

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 322–330 | Cite as

Shale gas: A non-conventional hydrocarbon as future energy resource of India

  • Syed Zaheer Hasan
  • M. A. Rasheed
  • T. Harinarayana
Research Articles


Shale gas, despite being trapped in low permeability horizons, has gained a big boom in recent years that can be utilized to partially meet the ever increasing demands of the conventional natural gas. The major assets of hydrocarbon potential are widely distributed over India. The Brahmaputra valley of NE India, the Cambay region of Gujarat coast, the west coast offshore and the east coast offshore regions are the potential areas from where the maximum hydrocarbon is tapped. In India approximately two-third production is shared by the offshore regions while the rest is contributed by the onshore regions. The average annual production of oil and gas does not meet the demands hence, dependency lies more on imports. The projected demand may increase many fold by the end of this decade. The continuous increase in demand leaves no option except to enhance R&D activities in order to explore extensively for the unconventional resources namely Coal Bed Methane, Tight reservoirs, Shale Gas, Underground Coal Gasification, Gas Hydrates etc. Except the Coal Bed Methane and the Shale Gas, the knowledge and efforts towards other alternate resources are still in preliminary stage. The present study aims to highlight the importance of Shale Gas in filling the gap between demand and supply in the Cambay basin.


Resource potential Non-conventional hydrocarbons Shale gas Cambay basin 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM) (2011) India formulating policy for shale gas exploration. DGH press release, May 10.Google Scholar
  2. Balakrishnan, T.S., Gupta, T.C. and Bisht, H.S. (1997) Regional tectonic and sedimentation in studies of Cambay basin. Unpubld. report-ONGC.Google Scholar
  3. Bhandari, L.L. and Chowdhary, L.R. (1975) Stratigraphic analysis of Kadi and Kalol formations. AAPG Bull., v.59, pp.856–871.Google Scholar
  4. Bhardwaj, V.K. and Saini, S.S. (2010) Hydrocarbon potential of India. In: A. K. Bhattacharya and S. Guha (Eds.), Glimpses of Geoscience Research in India, INSA, New Delhi, pp.251–252.Google Scholar
  5. Bhowmick P.K. and Misra R. (2010) Phanerozoic petroliferous basins of India. In: A.K. Bhattacharya and S. Guha (Eds.), Glimpses of Geoscience Research in India, INSA, New Delhi, pp. 218–228.Google Scholar
  6. Biswas, S.K. (1977) Mesozoic stratigraphy of Kutch, Gujarat. Quart. Jour. Geol. Min. Metall. Soc. India v.49(3–4), pp.1–52.Google Scholar
  7. Biswas, S.K., Rangaraju, M.K., Thomas J. and Bhattacharya S.K. (1994) Cambay-Hazad petroleum system in the south Cambay basin, India. In: B.L. Magoon and W.G. Dow (Ed.), Petroleum system-from source to trap, AAPG Memoir, No.60, pp.615–624.Google Scholar
  8. Brahmajirao, G., Philip, P.C., Padmanabhan, N., Siddiqui, M.A. and Saxena, R.P. (1991) Source rock development in Kommugudem Mandapeta and Draksharama. Proceedings of conference on integrated exploration research achievements and perspectives, ONGC, pp.395–398.Google Scholar
  9. British Petroleum (1996) Statistical review of world energy. Technical report by British Petroleum Company P.Lc, London.Google Scholar
  10. Chandra, K. (1997) Alternative hydrocarbon resources in the next millennium. /geohorizon, pp.1–19.Google Scholar
  11. Chandra, U., Dhawan, R., Mittal, A.K., Dwivedi, P. and Uniyal. A.K. (1995) Stable isotope geochemistry of associated gases from Lakwa-Lakhmani field, Upper Assam basin, India. Proceedings first international petroleum conference and exhibition, Petrotech-95, New Delhi, v.3.Google Scholar
  12. Cronquist C. (2001) Estimation and classification of reserves of crude oil, natural gas and condensates. Soc. Petroleum Engineers, 432p.Google Scholar
  13. Curtis J.B. (2002) Fractured shale- gas systems. AAPG Bull., v.86, pp.1921–1938.Google Scholar
  14. Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (DGH), India. Petroleum exploration and production activity reports, 2005-2006 onwards, source: Scholar
  15. Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (DGH) India,, (2011) Petroleum exploration and production activity reports, 2010-11, 128p, source: Scholar
  16. Frantz J.H. and Schlumberger, V.J. (2005) White paper on shale gas. Schlumberger Marketing Committee, pp.1–10.Google Scholar
  17. Gupta, S.K., Mazumdar, S.K. and Basu, B. (2000) Genesis of petroleum systems in Krishna Godavari basin. AAPG conference proceedings.Google Scholar
  18. Hasan, S.Z. and Farooqui, M.Y. (2011) A laboratory based study for shale gas reservoir characterization, stimulation and production evaluation. Abstracts-international conference on unconventional sources of fossil fuels and carbon management (ICUSFFCM-2011), 31p.Google Scholar
  19. Hasan, S.Z., Farooqui, M.Y., Ramachandran, K., Pushpita, T., Harinarayan, T. and Rao, P.H. (2013) Petroliferous basins and shale gas-an unconventional hydrocarbon asset of India. Geosciences, 3 (4), Scientific and Academic Publishing, USA, pp.108–118.Google Scholar
  20. Holditch, S.A. (2006) The increasing role of unconventional reservoirs in the future of the oil and gas business. SPE President Publications, pp.34–38.Google Scholar
  21. India Hydrocarbon Vision (IHV) (2025) Ministry of Petroleum, Government of India, Source: Scholar
  22. India Unconventional Gas Forum (IUGF) (2011) Unlocking the value of unconventional gas. Technical presentation by Dr. V.K. Rao, Sr. V.P., Reliance Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  23. Kaufman, P., Penny, G.S. and Paktinat, J. (2008) Critical evaluation of additives-used in shale gas slickwater fractures. Soc. Petroleum Engineers, SPE-119900.Google Scholar
  24. Kundu, J. and Wani, M.R. (1992) Structural styles and tectonostratigraphic framework of Cambay rift basin, western India. Indian Jour. Petrol. Geol., v.1, pp.181–202Google Scholar
  25. Misra, M. and Patel, B.K. (2011) Gas shale potential of Cambay formation, Cambay basin, India. Proc. 2nd South Asian Geosience Conference and Exhibition, GEOIndia, pp.1–5.Google Scholar
  26. Murty, K.S.R., Subramanyam, A.S., Lakshminarayana, S., Chandrashekhar, D.V. and Rao, T.C.S. (1995) Some geodynamic aspects of the Krishna-Godavari basin, east coast of India. Continental Shelf Res., v.15, No.7, pp.779–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murthy, M.K.V., Padhy, P.K. and Prasad, D.N. (2011) Mesozoic hydrogeologic systems and hydrocarbon habitat, Mandapeta- Endamuru area, Krishna-Godavari basin, India. AAPG Bull. v.95, No.1, pp.147–167.Google Scholar
  28. National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) (2007) Drilling down: protecting western communities from the health and environmental effects of oil and gas production. An official document-USA, October-2007, 48p.Google Scholar
  29. Padhy, P.K. and Das, S.K. (2013) Shale oil and gas plays: Indian sedimentary basins. Geohorizons, pp.20–24.Google Scholar
  30. Petroleum Federation of India (2012) Concepts of petroleum Geology, ONGC presentation, Industry-academia workshop on Technology imperatives for exploration and production of oil and gas, 26–29 March, 2012, Source: Scholar
  31. Porges, R. and Hammer, M. (2001) The compendium of hydrogeology. National Groundwater Association, USA, 303p.Google Scholar
  32. Potential Gas Agency (PGA) (2011) Future US and Canadian shale gas resources. Annual Report, Colorado School of Mines, USA.Google Scholar
  33. Rangaraju, M.K., Agarwal, A. and Prabhakar, K.N. (1991) Tectonostratigraphy structural style, evolutionary models and hydrocarbon prospects of Cauvery and Palar basins, India. Proc. Second Sem. Petroliferous Basins of India.Google Scholar
  34. Rogner, H.H. (1997) An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources. Annual Reviews Energy and Environments, no.22(99), pp.217–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmoker, J.W. (1994) Volumetric calculations of hydrocarbon generated. In: L.W. Magoon and W.G. Doe (Eds.), The petroleum system from source to trap, AAPG Memoir 60, pp.323–360.Google Scholar
  36. Singh, P.K. (2011) Geological and petro logical considerations for CBM exploration: a review. Energy sources part A: recovery, utilization and environmental effects, (Taylor and Francis), 33, pp.1211–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sury, M. (2004) Review of environmental issues of underground coal gasification. Report no. COAL R272 DTI/Pub URN 04/ 1880, November, 2004.Google Scholar
  38. Thus, B., Levy, R. and Bhatt, G.M. (2011) Shale gas exploration and production research in India by the Energy and Geoscience Institute, university of Utah-a model for Indian universities. Abstracts-international conference on unconventional sources of fossil fuels and carbon management (ICUSFFCM-2011), 21p.Google Scholar
  39. United States Geological Survey (2008) Models for gas hydratebearing sediments inferred from hydraulic permeability and elastic velocities. Scientific Investigation Report 2008–5219.Google Scholar
  40. Wikipedia, India Geological Zones, source: www.en.wikepedia.orgGoogle Scholar
  41. World Coal Institute (WCI) (2005) Coal Reserves: Optima, v.1, no.1: World Energy Council, “India: Extract from the Survey of Energy Resources, 2001”.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Geological Society of India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syed Zaheer Hasan
    • 1
  • M. A. Rasheed
    • 1
  • T. Harinarayana
    • 1
  1. 1.Gujarat Energy Research and Management InstituteGandhinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations